MythNix Profile picture
Sep 3 15 tweets 9 min read Read on X
MICHAEL JORDAN: WHEN DID HE BECOME THE GOAT? 🧵

MJ fans love to say you have to win 6 titles to be the GOAT.

It’s a bad argument, for obvious reasons, and it’s NEVER been the criteria before.

What’s funny is MJ started getting referred to as the “GOAT” in…1989.

Want proof?
Image
Image
Prior to the 89 playoffs, most of the commentary on Jordan was that he may have had the best talent ever, but he wasn’t the best player yet.

Notice how, here in January, 1989, Roy Johnson actually calls out Jordan for being a bad teammate.

“Certainly not the best teammate.”
Image
Image
In the 89 playoffs, it all changed.

Bruce Jenkins, a well-known Bay Area columnist, mentioned in a June 1, 1989 article that the discussion of whether Jordan was the GOAT was happening in press rooms.

It makes sense, as there had been a flurry of articles in the prior 2 weeks. Image
Let’s look at some.

Here’s an article in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Tribune, comparing Jordan to Babe Ruth, on May 16, 1989.

MJ had ONE playoff series win as of this date

He hadn’t been to a CONFERENCE FINALS yet.

By the way, Kareem was a month from retiring. 🤔
Image
Image
The first syndicated articles were on May 21, 1989, the date of gm 1 of the CF with Detroit.

At this point, MJ:
Was 26
Had won 2 playoff series
Was 7-13 in PO games
Had several 4th quarter collapses
Had ZERO titles, 1 CF

Quite a low bar for GOAT, no?

Different standards, no?
Image
Image
In this article, the writer lists out serious challengers.

Note that he eliminates CHAMPIONSHIPS in the criteria right away. Why? Because they’re team accomplishments.

He then concludes it’s MJ.

Prior to 6 titles
Prior to ONE title
Prior to ever playing a CF game

🤔
Image
Image
On the same day, Knight-Ridder had an “MJ is GOAT” article.

This is fun— in it, MJ blames his teammates for his not being the GOAT yet. 🤦‍♂️

Jordan also gets excused for not getting elite help at the start like Magic and Bird.

MJ gets that excuse, not Lebron.

Different.

Image
Image
Image
Here are 2 articles on May 28, 1989.

In one, both Bill Raftery and Rick Barry, 2 national lead basketball analysts/commentators, picked Jordan.

Where’s the discussion about needing 6 titles?

Kareem had 6 then. Magic 5.

But MJ needs NONE to be in the conversation?


Image
Image
Image
Image
Here’s an article on May 30th with quotes from experts.

Not one says “he needs 5 titles, then talk to me.”

Note, by the way, that Red Auerbach says MJ played a “loose defense” where “backcourt guys score a zillion points.”

But MJ STILL gets Red’s vote.

Different standards.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Here’s a fun one on June 4th where the writer argues Jordan ISN’T the GOAT yet, because he needs a title.

Of course, he doesn’t say he needs 6 to tie Kareem. Or 5 to tie Magic.

The fun part is the letters to the editor the next week from MJ fans argued he DIDN’T need a title!


Image
Image
Image
Image
It’s clear from these articles that:

MJ is absolutely IN the discussion for GOAT in May, 1989
Many have already concluded he’s the GOAT, with 0 titles
Those holding back are doing so because needs ONE title
Nobody says shit about “5 or 6” titles

These are LOWER standards.
The closest anyone gets to mentioning multiple titles is this breakout of the “top 10” all time, in the Detroit Press on May 18, 1989.

This criticizes West and Robertson for 1 title, and Wilt for having 2. It DOESN’T criticize Bird for only having 3.

So 2 is the cut-off. Not 6.

Image
Image
Image
Finally, here’s a reference to Kareem being the GOAT in 1972…with ONE title, vs a 42 win team in the Finals.

So Kareem’s ONE clears Russell and Wilt
And MJ needed NONE to clear Kareem

But Lebron at FOUR, while being favored in only 3 Finals, doesn’t qualify.

Different. Image
MJ fans will argue that it was clearly after 1993, after the first 3Peat.

So, OK. that’s only 3.

Isn’t 6 > 3? Did I miss something?

But somehow “6 > 4” is now valid?

A goalpost got moved.

Lebron constantly has to clear what MJ himself didn’t have to clear.
Finally, MJ fans will argue that MJ “raised the bar.”

To what?

Kareem HAD 6 titles (+6 MVPs)
Magic had 5
Russell had 11

But MJ only needed 0-2.

The bar is always lower for MJ. It’s how you know Lebron is the GOAT.

Congrats on 6…but it was NEVER part of the GOAT debate.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with MythNix

MythNix Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MythNix

Aug 19
MICHAEL JORDAN: STAT PADDING KING 🧵

MJ fans love to argue that Jordan didn’t care about stats, and that he didn’t stat pad.

It’s a BIG lie.

Nobody ever cared more about their stats. MJ was the Greatest Ever at Stat Padding. GOAT!

Take a look. It’s a long one!

Image
Image
Image
MJ cared about his stats RIGHT AWAY.

Per his Chicago scorekeeper, MJ checked his stats “every time” he reported in, starting in his “first week.”

MJ wanted to be sure he was the focus in the newspaper the next day.

This seems awfully early to be worried about stats, no?

🤔 Image
Jordan stat padded ALL his stats, not just points.

When he was playing point guard in 89, he stat padded triple doubles.

Again, he’d check in with scorekeepers to find out what he needed.

All in the hope of getting league MVP.

People caught on to it, and he didn’t win. 😔


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 19 tweets
Aug 5
FAKE 90’S NARRATIVES EXPOSED 🧵

Sports Illustrated had an article in March 1997 about the Bulls Superteam and the rest of the NBA.

This article was littered with commentary about how GREAT the league was, right?

Nope.

Did MJ fans not read this in 97?

Some comments…

Image
Image
Image
Here’s a reference to how there were no teams that could compete with the Superteam Bulls.

The commentary?

The Bulls were the same year over year, but the rest of the competition got WORSE.

Wait, wait…wasn’t this the greatest era EVER? Image
Today, old heads CONSTANTLY complain about:

The youth in the league
Free agency breaking up teams
Boneheaded shots

Bad, bad league today.

Yet…in 1997…they’re complaining about the SAME thing!

So the era that ACTUALLY sucked was back then, post-expansion?

🤔 Image
Read 7 tweets
Aug 1
1990 GENERAL MANAGER SURVEY 🧵
They surveyed NBA General Managers in the NBA in late 1990, Michael Jordan’s 6th season.

I’m sure the great MJ did really well on this, right? These are the main talent evaluators!

Let’s look. 22 GMs voted.
Image
Image
1) IF YOU COULD ADD ANY PLAYER TO YOUR ROSTER, WHO WOULD YOU ADD?

I mean, everyone knew MJ was the greatest. He’d be #1 here in a landslide. No question. GOAT!!!

Except…
He wasn’t first.
And he wasn’t second.

He finished THIRD.

13%. 3 out of 22.

WTF?!?

Are GMs casuals? Image
2) WHO’S THE BEST CLUTCH PLAYER?

OK, here we go. Jordan had 1989 vs CLE. 1986 vs BOS. 1982 title game. Easy. He’s the “most clutch player” EVER. Clutch, clutch, clutch.

Except…

He was behind Magic.

He lost out to a…NON-scorer?

WTF?!?

These GMs don’t know the game. Image
Read 8 tweets
Jul 15
MJ FINALS OPPONENTS CHOKING IN THE 4TH 🧵

People argue MJ “found a way to win.” Actually, his opponents found ways to LOSE.

These teams all choked when it mattered most. Stopped scoring. Always.

Here are the 4th QTRs for opponents in the last games of MJ’s Finals (+ 2 more). Image
1991 LAKERS
Game 5

With 4 minutes to go, the Lakers led 93-90.

While Paxson was downing 5 straight shots (not MJ), the Lakers had FOUR straight possessions with 0 points.

The Lakers had only 21 points in the 4th quarter (106 PPG during the season).

Here’s the first choke. 🤷‍♂️
Image
Image
1992 BLAZERS
Game 6

The Blazers led 79-64 entering the 4th.

Then Pippen and the bench outscored them 16-2, with Jordan out of the game.

The Blazers scored a whopping 14 POINTS in the 4th, after averaging 111 PPG that year.

No FGs in last 2:22.

“Gave it away.”

A choke.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 17 tweets
Jul 10
LEBRON’S 2004 BRONZE🧵

The criticism of “LeBronze” for the 2004 Olympics is DUMB.

D-U-M-B.

1) Lebron didn’t play. He played 3 MINUTES in the semifinal loss.
2) Overall, he shot 19-32, 65% TS%
3) Brown was criticized for NOT playing him. Stern even called Brown over it

1/4


Image
Image
Image
Image
The commentary at the time was all positive about his play, and positive about his WANTING to play.

His enthusiasm and energy wasn’t rewarded by Brown, who always hated young players.

Keep in mind that 7 of the original 9 players selected in July 2003 didn’t bother to show up.


Image
Image
Image
Image
To give everyone an idea of how much unfair criticism Lebron takes, the phrase “LeBronze” was coined by a writers THAT DAY.

It wasn’t coined by haters. It was coined by the MEDIA.

For a game he played 3 minutes in, at age 19.

Literally, Bronny is older right now.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Apr 21
LEBRON EXPECTATIONS: 39 YEAR OLDS IN PLAYOFFS 🧵

Lebron is going to be called a failure at some point in the playoffs for not playing at a “GOAT level.”

When, you know, he’s 39.

So how did other greats do at age 39 in the playoffs?

Here are some of the top players, ever.
Kareem, 1986
Kareem averaged 31 MPG, and had an 18 GameScore.
26/6/3.

This was the BEST of everyone at age 39.

But…the 86 Lakers MISSED the Finals.

Why? Because Hakeem/Sampson WORE DOWN Kareem, on the boards, and on defense.

Playing a 39 year old center was an issue.

Image
Image
Image
Kareem was 9-26 in game 2.

The Laker offenses stalled in the 4th in games 3 and 4, scoring 16 and 18.

Kareem’s defense was described as a “revolving door.”

Sampson hit the buzzer beater over Kareem in the final game.

The Lakers lost 4 in a row for the 1st time in 3 yrs.

😳
Image
Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(