Adam Klasfeld Profile picture
Sep 5 31 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Good morning from Washington, D.C.

After a long hiatus, Trump’s election subversion case is slated for another status conference.

The scene outside the courthouse this morning.

I’ll cover the proceedings live at 10 a.m. ET. Image
"All rise."

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan takes the bench.

Proceedings are about to begin.
For the gov't: Prosecutor Thomas Windom
For the defense: John Lauro

Judge Chutkan: "It's been almost a year. You look rested, Mr. Lauro."

Lauro cracks that life seemed "meaningless" without seeing the judge.

Chutkan: (laughter) "Enjoy it while it lasts!"
Judge Chutkan describes the SCOTUS immunity decision and describes her intentions for today's hearing.

"I don't intend to finalize the schedule at the hearing," she says.

She adds, however, that she hopes to do so today.
Chutkan reviews Trump's waiver of his presence at arraignment with Mr. Lauro.

Chutkan: "Mr. Trump is entering a plea of not guilty with respect to all four counts?"
Lauro: "That's right."
Chutkan describes what the prior schedule was before she put the proceedings on hold pending Trump's immunity appeal.
Chutkan: "As I see it, there are two main issues."

The first, she says, is how to resolve the remanded immunity issue.
Prosecutor Windom: "I don't think we're in a typical situation."

"We are in a place where the Supreme Court has created new law."
Windom argues for resolving the immunity issues first — and all at once: "We know that there is going to be an interlocutory appeal."

Prosecutors only "want to limit it to one," he says.
Windom proposes prosecutors filing a brief on the immunity issue within three weeks, late in the month.
Lauro calls the prosecution's proposal "enormously prejudicial" to Trump.

After Lauro claims that SCOTUS found Trump's conversations with Pence were official, Chutkan cuts him off: "No, I would have to disagree with you. They have sent it back to me to figure that out."
The defense argues that Chutkan should find Trump's conversations with Pence official as a matter of law, but Chutkan says that she risks "reversal" if she does so in light of the SCOTUS ruling.

Chutkan (wryly): "I mean, I'm risking reversal no matter what I do."
Chutkan notes that SCOTUS ordered her to resolve the remaining immunity issues "forthwith."

She presses Lauro on why the defense is asking her to review their other motions first.
Lauro warns about prosecutors being "able to put into the public record at a very sensitive time in our nation's history, which we can't ignore."

Chutkan let out a sigh and leaned back in her seat at that remark.
Chutkan addresses Lauro's remark: "I understand that there's an election impending."

The judge adds the election "is not relevant here," reiterating remarks she made at a hearing one year ago.

"This court is not concerned about the election schedule," she continues.
Lauro: "There's something unseemly about a rush to judgment."

Chutkan: "This case has been pending for more than a year. We're hardly sprinting to the finish line here."
After Lauro complain about the government's proposal to file a brief within three weeks, Chutkan replies: "Well, Mr. Lauro, three weeks is not certainly breakneck speed."
Lauro: "It's a quagmire. It's completely prejudicial because they decide what to unseal."

He says it shows "fundamental unfairness, never before seen in a district court."
Lauro argues that allegations concerning Pence is one of the "gateway issues" for dismissing the case.

Chutkan notes that the Supreme Court should have dismissed all allegations concerning Pence, if they wanted to.

"They didn't," she adds. "They sent it back to me."
Chutkan says she's heard enough on that topic, and she asks him about the govt's proposals to brief certain matters concurrently.

Lauro complains about "technical issues," a remark that seems to frustrate the judge.

Before, the defense had delays getting clearance, she notes.
Lauro: "We're talking about the Presidency of the United States.
Chutkan: "I'm not talking about the Presidency of the United States. I'm talking about a four-count criminal indictment."
The government's back up:

Windom notes that the Supreme Court's opinion was al about making factual determination.
Judge Chutkan asks how much of that information the government expects to be under seal.

Windom defers to the court to decide what should remain under seal pursuant to the protective order.
As Lauro gets back up, Chutkan chides: "I don't need any rhetoric about how serious and grave this is."

Lauro responds: "It's not rhetoric. It's called legal argument."
Trump's lawyer Lauro:

"We have an illegitimate prosecutor. We have an illegitimate indictment."
Judge Chutkan splashes cold water on Lauro's attempt to raise a challenge on Jack Smith's legitimacy.

"There's binding D.C. [Circuit] precedent on this issue," Chutkan says, adding she "does not find" Judge Cannon's opinion "particularly persuasive."
Context:

The D.C. Circuit upheld the legitimacy of special counsel appointments, and its jurisdiction binds Chutkan.

Cannon's, in a district court from another circuit, does not.
Chutkan asks Lauro if his position is whether the indictment falls if the evidence concerning Pence is out, and Lauro responds in the affirmative.
After Lauro raises concerns about the disclosure of exculpatory material, Chutkan responds: "Brady's an ongoing obligation. I take it very seriously, and the government knows that."

Windom, later: "We have met our discovery obligations. [...] We do not anticipate any additional disclosures."
Chutkan: "I will take all of these into considering as I [draft] the scheduling order."
Judge Chutkan: "That's all I have. I thank everyone for their preparation today."

She promises to issue the scheduling order "as soon as possible."

Hearing concludes.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

Aug 27
NEWS:

Jack Smith just filed a superseding indictment against Trump.

Prosecutors say the new indictment "reflects the Government’s efforts to respect and implement the Supreme Court’s holdings and remand instructions in Trump v. United States."

Doc storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Note for those unfamiliar:

A superseding indictment replaces an existing indictment.

There are no new charges in today's indictment against Trump here, only the same four leveled against him in connection with the 2020 election, tailored to pass the Supreme Court's new test.
Today's news does, however, mean that another grand jury that did not see the evidence earlier put their stamp on the same charges.

On a quick glance, the latest indictment is shorter, and nixes DOJ-related claims that wouldn't have survived the immunity ruling.
Read 5 tweets
Jul 11
Just in:

Trump's lawyers filed a motion to vacate his 34 felony convictions and dismiss his New York indictment.

In the wake of SCOTUS's immunity ruling, they argue that certain testimony and evidence shouldn't have been introduced at trial, like the categories shown here. Image
DA Bragg's deadline to respond to Trump's arguments is July 24.
A few thoughts on this:

Trump's lawyers are not just challenging his convictions, based on the alleged use of "official-acts evidence."

Since prosecutors brought some of this evidence to the grand jury, they want his indictment thrown out too.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 2
Trump's sentencing in New York has been postponed in the wake of the SCOTUS immunity decision.

Justice Merchan has rescheduled it for Sept. 18.

Doc nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/pre…
Image
Explainer

Trump's lawyers agree that he isn't immune from prosecution in his N.Y. case, but they argued before trial that prosecutors shouldn't be allowed to use evidence tied to his official acts.

In April, Merchan rejected that motion as "untimely." nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/pre…
Image
On appeal, Trump's lawyers must argue:

* Merchan had it wrong that Trump brought his motion too late.

* That Trump's tweets and other records from the time of his presidency shown to the jury were "official acts."

* Prosecutors wrongly used that evidence to convict him. Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 23
Just in

On Friday, Trump's lawyer argued that ex-AG Bill Barr only appointed Senate-confirmed US Attorneys as special counsel.

Jack Smith just contradicted that in a supplemental briefing showing three of Barr's special counsel picks from 1991 and 1992. Image
In the same briefing, Smith provided a list of statutes that appear to use "officials" to include inferior officers who don't require the advice and consent of the Senate.

It's quite long, and it rebuts Team Trump's claim that "officials" means something else.
Image
Image
Judge Cannon invited prosecutors to file this brief backing up their arguments defending the special counsel's constitutional authority at the end of Friday's proceedings.

You can read it in full here.

documentcloud.org/documents/2477…
Read 4 tweets
May 30
Justice Merchan:

"We, the jury, have a verdict."
The judge announced he was going to excuse the jury before he received and read that jury note.
Alina Habba enters the courtroom and sits in the front row.
Read 4 tweets
May 29
Good morning from New York.

After a Manhattan judge delivers his instructions, a jury of Trump's peers will begin a historic process: deliberations to determine whether to convict a former U.S. president of felonies.

As always, I will be reporting live from the courtroom. 🧵
Trump has entered the courtroom, followed by his entourage.

The daily photography session has begun.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who has appeared only occasionally, is not in the courtroom this morning.
"All rise."

The jury is entering, and some appear more dressed up than usual — ready to work.

Justice Merchan tells them that he will now instruct them on the law.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(