Thomas Zimmer Profile picture
Sep 10 16 tweets 3 min read Read on X
One reason to be skeptical about anti-Trump Republicans is that they tend to propagate a diagnosis of Trumpism as a mere aberration from an otherwise noble conservative tradition. Such self-serving mythology misleads the political discussion.
 
My new piece (link in bio):
 
🧵1/ Screenshot of my latest “Democracy Americana” newsletter: “Liz Cheney and the Problem of the Anti-Trump Republican: Republicans who hold the line against Trump deserve respect. But champions of egalitarian, pluralistic democracy they are not - and that also matters”
If America is to claw its way out of this crisis to something better, it must do so on the basis of an honest assessment of what Trumpism is, what fueled its rise, and where it came from. The anti-Trumpers, however, are offering something very different. 2/
In their standard tale, Trump executed a hostile takeover of the GOP and turned it into something that has nothing to do with the party’s former real self, that supposedly venerable “Reagan Republicanism” anti-Trumpers almost invariably invoke as their ideal. 3/
Two diametrically opposed narratives emerged in response to Trump’s rise before the 2016 election. The one the anti-Trumpers are propagating is the aberrationist tale, according to which the venerable tradition of principled American conservatism has been hijacked. 4/
Trumpism, in this interpretation, is fundamentally not conservatism, entirely separate from what came before, an accident, an insurgency, something hostile to the “soul” of the GOP – a narrative that allows “moderate” conservatives and Never Trumpers to self-exonerate. 5/
On the other end of the spectrum, there is an interpretation claiming that Trump’s rise was really no big surprise: This is what conservatism, at its core, had always been – a reactionary movement, fueled by racial and cultural grievance, animated by anti-liberal sentiment. 6/
Everything else was just a front, a veneer of intellectual depth and respectability. There had been no venerable tradition to begin with, rather a fairly straight line from Buckley to Ronald Reagan to Pat Buchanan and Newt Gingrich to Sarah Palin to, finally, Donald Trump. 7/
Neither the continuity nor the aberration narratives stand up to serious scrutiny in their most simplistic forms. The challenge is to grapple with both the recent radicalization, but also the long-standing anti-democratic tendencies and impulses on the Right. 8/
We need to acknowledge both the extent to which far-right factions and ideas have recently managed to take over the power centers of conservatism, but also the fact that extremism has always been an influential feature of the rightwing coalition. 9/
Modern conservatism as a political project arose in the middle decades of the 20th century as an alliance between different factions who agreed that a fully realized democracy was the enemy of the “natural” order defined by hierarchies of race, gender, wealth, and religion. 10/
The central conflict on the Right has always revolved around the question of how far conservatives had to go to preserve this “natural” order – with far-right forces pushing for a more radical politics and more drastic action – for a reactionary “counter-revolution.” 11/
GOP elites and “moderate” conservatives have often tried – and always failed – to harness far-right popular energies that ultimately fueled Trump’s rise. They have never been able to control the accelerating radicalization that is now threatening constitutional government. 12/
This interpretation stands in stark contrast to the self-serving aberrationist tale of Trumpism as an accidental departure. And it has profound implications for a society that will have to find a way to contain and overcome Trumpism. 13/
Things would be so much easier if Trump really were the cause, rather than himself a symptom – if all we had to do was to get rid of Trump and let the country, and the Republican Party, revert to “normal.” 14/
But since the rise of Trumpism is more in line with long-standing extremist tendencies, a manifestation of a deeply entrenched anti-democratic political culture, then merely turning the clock back to a pre-2016 “normal” can’t be the answer. 15/
That pre-2016 “normal” allowed Trump to swiftly take over the Republican Party and the Right more broadly. If the goal is for a stable democracy that truly deserves the label to emerge out of the current mess, America – and conservatives – will have to do better.

More here: Screenshot of my latest “Democracy Americana” newsletter: “Liz Cheney and the Problem of the Anti-Trump Republican: Republicans who hold the line against Trump deserve respect. But champions of egalitarian, pluralistic democracy they are not - and that also matters”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Zimmer

Thomas Zimmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tzimmer_history

Aug 13
What is “weird” and what is “normal” in America?

Democrats are, finally, asserting their right to define the boundaries of normalcy – and their claim to be defending the nation’s true ideals against the reactionary assault.

Some thoughts from my new piece (link in bio):

🧵1/ Screenshot of my latest “Democracy Americana” newsletter: What is “weird” and what is “normal” in America? Democrats are, finally, asserting their right to define the boundaries of normalcy – and their claim to be defending the nation’s true ideals against the reactionary assault”
I wrote about why the “These guys are weird” messaging matters: It crystallizes a central fault line – who gets to define “normal” America? – and catalyzes a significant shift in how Democrats handle (and finally reject!) Republican assertions of representing “real America.” 2/
Since the late 1960s, Republicans have successfully weaponized the idea that they represent the norm that should define the nation. This assertion (in)famously crystallized in the “silent majority” notion Richard Nixon popularized early in his presidency. 3/
Read 15 tweets
Aug 5
ICYMI on the weekend: I wrote about an encounter with enraged Trumpers - and the difficult road ahead for a society in which conspiracies, extremist iconography, and political violence have become ubiquitous.

MAGA on the Beach Redux (link in bio):
 
🧵1/ Screenshot of my latest “Democracy Americana” newsletter: “MAGA on the Beach Redux: On an encounter with enraged Trumpers - and the difficult road ahead for a society in which conspiracies, extremist iconography, and political violence have become ubiquitous.”
I wrote about a run-in with an elderly lady who quickly went from pleasant small talk to launching a conspiratorial tirade about Joe Biden’s war on upstanding patriots and how Trump alone could save the Republic. It tells us something about political culture in America today. 2/
She was an elderly white person, with an academic background, widely traveled, had lived overseas, and, it can be assumed, reasonably wealthy. I’ve spent a fair bit of time reflecting on what, if anything, I should take away from this encounter. 3/
Read 14 tweets
Jul 27
Weekend reading: I wrote about the meaning of Kamala Harris in this particular moment in history.

Her story as VP reflects the post-George Floyd racial reckoning that never came as well as the racial and social retrenchment since 2020:

🧵1/

thomaszimmer.substack.com/p/kamala-harri…
Screenshot of my latest “Democracy Americana” newsletter: “Kamala Harris May Force a Reckoning: Harris emerged as VP in the summer of 2020 when it seemed the country might finally deal with its defining demons. But as the reactionary counter-mobilization triumphed, she was sidelined. Until now.”
Harris’ arc since 2020 points to how much of a reactionary retrenchment we have experienced, and how much social, racial, and gender progress have come to be viewed as “woke” radicalism that has supposedly gone too far - a position shared by elites across party lines. 2/
Harris was seen as the perfect VP in the summer of 2020: A woman of color, highly qualified and accomplished, who rose to elite status through her abilities and determination, in a party that wanted to tell the world: Yes, we are indeed the champions of multiracial pluralism. 3/
Read 12 tweets
Jul 24
Kamala Harris May Force a Reckoning

Harris emerged as VP in the summer of 2020 when it seemed the country might finally deal with its defining demons. But as the reactionary counter-mobilization triumphed, she was sidelined. Until now.

My new piece (link in bio):

🧵1/ Screenshot of my latest “Democracy Americana” newsletter: “Kamala Harris May Force a Reckoning: Harris emerged as VP in the summer of 2020 when it seemed the country might finally deal with its defining demons. But as the reactionary counter-mobilization triumphed, she was sidelined. Until now.”
I wrote about the meaning of Kamala Harris in this particular moment in American history: Her story as VP reflects the post-George Floyd racial reckoning that never came as well as the racial and social retrenchment since 2020. 2/
The Right will go all in on racist and sexist attacks against the Black woman that now stands between them and a return to power. Already in 2020, the Right tried a little birtherism against Harris - unsurprising from a movement that wants to abolish birthright citizenship. 3/
Read 9 tweets
Jul 16
I got to talk to @MollyJongFast about “Project 2025.”
 
The radical Right wasn’t ready for Trump’s first presidency. In 2025, they will be.

What should people know about these plans for an authoritarian takeover of government? Some thoughts:
 
🧵1/

thomaszimmer.substack.com/p/what-makes-p…

Screenshot of the third part of a series about “Project 2025” for my “Democracy Americana” newsletter: “What Makes ‘Project 2025’ So Dangerous: Will the Right be able to implement these radical plans? Is Trump on board? What happened to traditional conservatism? Let’s tackle some of the key questions surrounding ‘Project 2025’”
There has been a ton of attention lately for Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation-led planning operation for a more efficient, more ruthless rightwing regime - peaking in reaction to Trump pretending he doesn’t know anything about it, which is an obvious, brazen lie. 2/
Public attention is necessary: In a very real sense, these plans are on the ballot in November. However, it’s also turned “Project 2025” into a bit of a catchall term - when we should be precise about what it tells us about Trump’s role and about the Right more broadly. 3/
Read 17 tweets
Jul 10
Allies Against Democracy: Trump and Project 2025
 
Trump is not the mastermind behind Project 2025. It’s worse: The rightwing establishment has radicalized to the point where their plans are entirely in line with his vengeful desires.

My new piece (link in bio):

🧵1/ Screenshot of my latest “Democracy Americana” newsletter: “Allies Against Democracy: Trump and Project 2025 - Trump is not the mastermind behind Project 2025. It’s worse: The rightwing establishment has radicalized to the point where their plans are entirely in line with his vengeful desires”
I wrote about the relationship between Trump and Project 2025, between the inner circle of MAGA world on the one hand and the institutional and intellectual elites of American conservatism on the other: A radicalizing alliance against democratic pluralism. 2/
Donald Trump lied when he declared he had nothing to do with Project 2025 and knew no one involved in the operation. Not exactly shocking, I know. But there is something more interesting and revealing going on here than just habitual lying. 3/
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(