It is a giant lie that there is a meaningful opposition to the war in Russia.
800,000 Germans were imprisoned by the Gestapo for resistance during WW2 and thousands were executed.
In Russia, as of March this year, there were 892 court cases. Out of 140 million. 🧵
Since the faux Russian oppositionists love to bring up “those who rot in prison”: yes, over the years I have known people who were clearly murdered by the regime; I’ve known political prisoners. I’ve known people who killed themselves due to harassment and out of despair.
Yes, I also know of people who sabotaged military infrastructure and who are now paying a severe price for that. I know of random cases of bravery and refusal to sell one’s soul for a few roubles.
However, they were and are very few, and they have nothing to do with the thousands of morally ugly individuals abroad today who style themselves “opposition.”
I have periodically over the last 2.5 years immersed myself in their social media chatter, in their writings and podcasts, sometimes interacting but more often just observing. And it is an alternative reality of giant self-pity, entitlement, callousness and imperialism.
They need Putin because his presence provides them with the ability to virtue-signal, which is key to their winning acceptance from gullible Western audiences. Beneath the anti-Putin veneer, there is nothing at all. Nothing you can’t find in every Putinist.
But there is more. These people are atrociously intolerable and intolerant, contemptuous and often hateful of Ukrainians. Their speech is peppered with the bitter sarcasm of bad faith and careful evasions of reality.
They curse Putin not because he unleashed a genocide in Ukraine or because he committed a genocide in Chechnya (which they carefully made sure not to “see” 20 years ago). They curse him because he inconvenienced them. That’s really it.
They are entirely unreachable as potential partners in a common struggle. They are unapologetic and even militant about their disastrous infighting or their hare-brained schemes like “mass voting abroad to show Putin what we can do.”
Or like their “smart voting” scheme in Russia which resulted in a Duma candidate they had endorsed winning over the United Russia candidate, only to reveal himself as a neo-Nazi extremist who has called for the physical annihilation of all Ukrainians.
Alexey Didenko was an “opposition” candidate endorsed by the Navalny squad, ACF/FBK, and he won due to votes from Russians in Paris and London. Of course he’s a neo-Nazi. He’s from LDPR, which only deluded minds can consider “opposition.”
As a rule, the Russian “opposition” considers itself to be brilliant and all its actions to be remarkably successful. When they “fall short,” it is only because of “NAFO bots,” the Russophobia of unintelligent Westerners and, of course, Putin.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I received “fan mail” from people who were triggered by these facts about the then-Marxist functionary Olaf Scholz who whitewashed Soviet aggression and spoke against the U.S. and NATO. Facts are pesky things, aren’t they? It’s actually even worse than that. See posts below.
In January 1984, Scholz and the Juso delegation went on a high-profile visit to GDR. There, Scholz shamefully said, “We agree with Comrade Krenz that no one in GDR is imprisoned for their beliefs” while he knew Bärbel Bohney, Ulrike Poppe and many others languished in prison.
There was a subsequent reception for the delegation attended by the visiting Jusos and the hosting East German officials. Following speeches, “small group discussions” were held: clearly, Stasi (and Moscow) used these to probe Juso’s attitudes for consistency.
Beware this false argument: “TENET media? Unimportant bloggers. This is what you claim is Russia interfering?”
Let me introduce you to the African People’s Socialist Party (APSP),
black-power separatists, and Yes California. Don’t know about them? Russia does. It owns them. 🧵
Most people are ignorant of how Russia subverts societies. This is to our peril. Russia is exceptionally patient, systematic and granular. Think about this: Russia worked to interfere in St. Petersburg’s politics. No, not that one. St. Petersburg, Florida.
For 9 years, from 2013 to 2022, Aleksandr Ionov, head of the FSB front organisation “Anti-Globalization Movement of Russia” (AGMR) funded, supervised, welcomed to Russia, and provided talking points and action items to ASPS and parties in the UK, Spain and Ireland.
“We must penetrate every milieu, get hold of artists and professors, make use of cinemas and theatres, and spread abroad the notion that Russia is prepared to sacrifice everything to keep the world at peace.”
Willi Munzenberg, top Comintern official, 1924, Moscow. 🧵part 1
“[Moscow] has repeatedly violated its pledges of international cooperation. It has destroyed the independence of its neighbors and sought to disrupt those countries it could not dominate. Communist imperialism preaches peace but practices aggression.”
H. Truman, Sept 1, 1950.
“Moscow is, before venturing an open war, trying to make the world believe that it stands for peace and we stand for war. They know everybody wants peace, and if they can pose as the lovers of peace, then, perhaps they can risk war.”
John Foster Dulles, 1950
It’s 1982. Moscow has just invaded Afghanistan and deployed nuclear missiles threatening Europe. What was the biggest threat for a large group of Germans? “No Subordination to American Imperialism!”
Look who’s in attendance. The deputy chairman of Juso, the Young Socialists.
That same year, Scholz wrote: “For the progressive forces in this country, there can only be a decisive NO to rearmament. A turn to the right means complete subordination to the offensive global strategy of US imperialism. A turn to the left means revoking the NATO decision.”
While Scholz was deputy chairman, the chairman of Juso was one Gerhard Schröder. Gerhard and Olaf had a special fondness for Party functionaries from the GDR and the Soviet Komsomol. One was Egon Krenz, head of the GDR’s version of Komsomol, the FDJ.
In the early 2000s, two things happened that should have been a loud and clear sign to all that the Putinist state was going to end up unleashing massive aggression beyond its borders. One was Beslan. The other was the rehabilitation and re-glorification of Stalin.
The Putin regime came to power having invented enemies that allegedly posed an existential threat to Russia. Enemies were absolutely needed but the regime knew it had to be smart about their identity.
One set of enemies were the Chechen “militants” that went on a curious countryside hike into Dagestan in the summer of 1999 under the watchful (read: protective) eyes of Russian army commanders, who were under strict orders not to fire at them.
This summer the U.S. approved the permanent residency application of one “Jack” Moshkovich, who just so happens to be the son of Vadim Moshkovich, one of Putin’s most loyal oligarchs and someone who silently endorsed the war by attending the infamous February 24, 2022, meeting.
Vadim is sanctioned but clearly that was no obstacle to “Jack” becoming a permanent U.S. resident. Jack and most other offspring of the criminal oligarchs have degrees from top U.S. universities, which have never been known to decline the money of kleptocrats.
One such offspring is Denis Aven, who also just so happens to be the son of sanctioned oligarch Petr Aven, one of Putin’s closest friends since, oh, just about 40 years ago. Petr is, who would believe it, incredibly wealthy (think Alfa Group, Aven and Fridman).