Exposing the myth of Ahirs being Yaduvanshi Kshatriyas in this thread.
A THREAD 🧵
+
In 1910,a meeting of Shudra Ahirs was held & it was decided that now Ahirs will write Yadav as their surname. Meanwhile, Ghosi Ahirs of Shikohabad, District- Firozabad (UP) formed All India Yadav Mahasabha in 1914 & a movement took place in UP and Bihar and Ahirs started
+
writing Yadav and started calling themselves Yaduvanshi Kshatriyas.
+
Ahirs started keeping 'Yadav' surname under the influence of Arya Samaj for purpose of Sanskritisation.
They held Mahasabha in Allahabad in 1910 from whence cow herders across North India and some in central India took Yadav name.
+Apsoa
Also,there was Janeu Andolan as well, headed by Arya Samaj missionary Krishnanand Saraswati who was himself Ahir before name change.
+
In the caste literature on the basis of which the Ahirs Yadavised themselves with the help of the Arya Samaj, it is mentioned that they are borrowing the Yadav identity while claiming their origin from the "Rajputs."
+
Also in 1931 census, the Ahirs/Ahars claimed a new caste name for themselves, started calling themselves "Yadav, Yaduvanshi, Jaduvanshi, Nandvanshi".
+
The real Yaduvanshis are Rajputs only. Jadon, Bhati, Jadeja, Chudasamas are Yaduvanshi Rajputs.
Due to this, Ahirs borrowed the name Yadav while claiming their origin from Yaduvanshi Rajputs.(3rd img.)
+
Now let us know the proof of their being Shudra......
+
According to the Sanskrit text "Hemshabdanushasan" written by Acharya Hemchandra in the 12th century,Abhir is a Mahashudra and here the meaning of the word Mahashudra is also explained (Mahti Chasau Shudra Cha Mahashudreti = Lower Than Shudra in Varna system = Malechha)
+
According to Matsya Purana (Part-1, Chapter 50, Verse 76), the origin of Abhiras is from the Mlechchha caste who ruled with deceit. This verse proves that the Abhiras described in the Mahabharata are Mlechchha (ßhudra tribe).
+
According to Smriti Chandrika written by Devan Bhatt in 1200 AD, Ahir Padas (family of Ahir caste) were always kept out of Varna and Ashram, that is, this description proves them to be Mlechchha and Mahashudra.
Abhira dynasty ruled in West Deccan from 203-315 AD where a total of 7 inscriptions and copper plates were found but they are not mentioned as Kshatriya, Yaduvanshi or Chandravanshi anywhere. In Daulatpur inscription their gotra is written as Sudauskrasa which is not from
+
Yaduvanshi gotra (Atri) but is of Iranian origin.
+
Acharya Dandi stated in the 7th century book Kavyadarsh that the Abhirs did not speak Sanskrit and their behavior was like that of the non-Aryans and Mlechhas (plundering, robbery) and their language was Apabhramsha and Abhiri… which proves them to be Mlechhas and Mahashudras.
It is clear from Vedic and Mahabharata era, ancient and medieval sources that Ahir caste was Mahashudra and Mlechchha who had no relation with Yaduvanshis. After 1910, they formed a group of Ahir, Gwala, Ghoshi, Gola, Sadgop castes and started writing collectively as Yadav...
We have come to know that Ahirs claim their origin from Yaduvanshi Rajputs to make themselves Kshatriyas and adopt the name Yadav, but let us also tell you that the Mathura case is going on, in which history of Yaduvnshi Kshatriya is explained in terms of Karauli Jadon Rajputs
+
Now let us know about the ßhudra Ahir women who were in the harem of Rajputs and from whom many Ahir clans also sprung.
"The Bundela Rajput King kept an Ahir lady as his concubine whose husband was still alive at that time. He even had a son from that Ahir concubine."
>Dauwa or wet-nurse Ahirs are the descendants of the illegitimate offsprings of Bundela Rajput fathers and Ahir m*others.
>Bundela Rajputs often preferred to keep ahir women as concubines, who were called Pardwarni, fosterage or from another home.
"Ahir clans were the personal servants of all Rajput families, not only this, the Daua sub-clan of Ahirs used to supply nurses i.e. concubines to the Rajput families, and they were also proud of it."
After Rajasthani Rajputs in height index by Britishers, there were Purbiah Rajputs and Brahmans of Eastern India (Up/Bihar) are the tallest ones at that time.
These census were done by the Britishers on the basis of martial recruitment in the military.
In 1901 census there is not mentioned about pubiahz bcz at that time new recruitment of soldiers from Purbiah communities were stopped due to the mass revolt.
But those were oldest recruited soldiers who were always sent to foreign war,are also not included in it but in 19 ce.
Sir Herbert Stewart's column crossing the Bayuda Desert with his army, 1885
Mostly purbiah soldiers from 7th rajputt were transferred to China after Anglo Egyptian war but Bengal lancers were not,most probably (bcz there is not any returned data is given) they were sent to compaign with Sir Herbert Stewart's Sussex regim., which was the main core of 1885
Let us know about the Karnat Dynasty of Mithila, the traditions related to them in Nepal and historical evidences, and finally, we will know about their true legit descendants:
"The Gandharavariya Rajputs"
A Thread 🧵
+
Before karnats, Palas were the rulers of Mithila or it can be said that Mithila was under palas,then they replaced by the Karnatas in Mithiila. Nanyadeva was the founder of this dynasty. This dynasty ruled Mithila from 1097 to 1325 AD. He had extended his dominion up to Nepal
+
Now,first thing we should know about Karnats is that none of the kings of Karnat Dynasty of Mithila has made any mention about their own Gotra or Kuldevi. It has not been mentioned anywhere.
+
"जब जब टिप्पणी करोगे तब तब थ्रेड आयेगा"
I had said this earlier too, but now let me tell these bhus thier aukaat.
A thread on Banaras raj.....fakery-bravery🧵
+
Balwant Singh was a coward king who was so cowardly that he hid himself in his fort out of fear of the Nawab and was afraid of even having a peaceful conversation.
+
>Balwant Singh was so cowardly that only 16 Rajputs had defeated his army 4 times, in end when those Rajputs came out of the fort with only a sword, yet no one could compete with them there. Then Balwant had to use his armed men/muskeeters out of fear.
+
Real Origin & identity of Ahvansh Rajputs is in darkness.
A detail thread...🧵
+
Ahivanshi/Ahbansh Rajput is the smallest clan of Uttar Pradesh and is found in Panchal region, currently found only in Lakhimpur. These are found in the same area which was earlier named Ahikshetra/Ahichchhatra which was the capital of Panchal region.
+
Ahichchhatra(Sanskrit: अहिच्छत्र, IAST: Ahicchatra) or Ahikshetra (Sanskrit: अहिक्षेत्र, IAST: Ahikṣetra) derived from Ahi means Nagas and chattra means nagas-chatra or nagas-kshetra.
+
This is a very small clan or rather a subclan whose history is completely underrated among us, on which I am posting today but today I will only clear the points of their origin and migration.
+
>First of all we will take the migration point. the migration of Singhel Rajputs which happened first from Sironj (MP) to Gorakhpur and then to other places including Muhammadabad(mainly) and azamgarh.
+
>Well, let us come to Sironj which is in MP and Sironj was ruled by Sengar Rajputs who had established their rule in the 1103AD. Sironj was also named as "Sengar Raj", so from here a point emerges that most probably. Singhel Rajputs are connected to Sengars or rather "branch".