After law school, Vance went to California. When he moved back to Ohio, he announced it in a NY Times op-ed. (Who does that?!?)
But even worse, in that op-ed, he tried to make it look like he was making…
1/
…a big sacrifice to come to Ohio.
He acted as if he was taking one for the team by gracing us with his return. (“It wasn’t an easy choice. I scaled back my commitments to a job I love because of the relocation.”….“not every motivation is rational”).
2/
He and his wife apparently worried about the “unpredictable weather” here.
But, he suggests , coming home despite those worries was his way of making a choice that was best “for the country.”
My response: if you think this is taking one for the team, stay where you are
3/
But Vance also said something else in that op-ed: “I’m founding an organization to combat Ohio’s opioid epidemic.”
Phew.
JD to the rescue on THE issue ravaging Ohio families and communities.
How did this critical work go?
4/
Well, this non-profit turned out to be as scammy as Trump University.
As the NYT summarized: “Mr. Vance’s nonprofit group raised only about $220,000, hired only a handful of staff members, shrank drastically in 2018 and died for good in 2021.”
5/
“It left only the faintest mark on the state it had been meant to change, leaving behind a pair of op-eds and two tweets. (Mr. Vance also started a sister charity, which paid for a psychiatrist to spend a year in a small-town Ohio clinic. Then it shuttered, too.)”
6/
Wouldn’t you know it?
Instead of dealing with the opioid crisis, the nonprofit seemed awfully focused on political matters: “some of the nonprofit group’s own workers said they had drawn a different conclusion:
7/
They had been lured by the promise of helping Ohio, but instead had been used to help Mr. Vance start his career in politics….During its brief life, Mr. Vance’s organization paid a political consultant who also advised Mr. Vance about entering the 2018 Senate race….
8/
…It paid an assistant who helped schedule Mr. Vance’s political speeches. And it paid for a survey of “Ohio citizens” that several of the staff members said they had never seen.”
9/
And yes. Vance was considering running for Senate as early as 2018, so that “nonprofit” survey seemed well-timed.
10/
Overall, according to Business Insider, the non-profit “spent more on ‘management services’ provided by its executive director Jai Chabria — who also serves as Vance's top political advisor — than it did on programs to fight opioid abuse.”
11/
One other thing: when it wasn’t spending money for what looked to be political maneuvering and staffing, the nonprofit’s actual opioid work was hugely problematic.
12/
At one point, according to the AP, its “addiction specialist” was a doctor “tainted by ties [to] the institute that employed her and Purdue Pharma, the manufacturer of OxyContin.”
13/
She had previously published articles “questioning the role of prescription painkillers in the national opioid crisis.”
14/
Sounds really helpful….for Big Pharma.
And not Ohioans, who were in the epicenter of the prescription drug and pill mill crisis, which most certainly fueled the broader opioid and heroin crisis that’s devastated communities ever since.
15/
Think about that…when he claimed to be heroically moving home to improve the country, Vance picked THE issue he knew was most roiling Ohio lives and families, and used THAT as his cover story when he was actually focusing his time on getting politically positioned.
16/
Using the opioid crisis as your cover story IN Ohio is about as sick as it gets.
So it shouldn’t surprise us that a guy that cynical and calculating is now doing what he’s doing re Springfield.
Or engage in all the other disturbing things he does.
17/
Let’s defeat this guy in November, folks. He has no business anywhere near the White House.
Then let’s be sure he never gets elected from Ohio again.
The Sick GOP Strategy Re. Springfield—and fighting back effectively
A 🧵
What JD Vance, Donald Trump, Elon Musk are doing—spreading vile, racist and debunked conspiracy theories regarding migrants in Springfield, Ohio—is so deeply disturbing.
So sick. So dangerous.
1/
But….it’s important to see that what they are doing follows a strategy.
It’s the exact same pattern we’ve witnessed in recent cycles.
And it ties directly into Donald Trump’s killing of the immigration bill in the Senate earlier this year.
2/
Fully aware that most of what they stand for is deeply unpopular (think abortion bans, Project 2025, and most everything Trump and Vance talk about), what’s happening around Springfield and Haitian migrants is now their playbook come election time.
3/
The reason the far right is hell-bent on undermining independent courts in states is because in many cases, those courts remain the final check on power against highly gerrymandered legislatures.
1/
Three decisions in recent days underscore their importance. True wins for justice and democracy.
In Missouri, the Supreme Court reversed a cynical effort to deprive voters of their opportunity to protect reproductive freedom—
2/
reversing a lower court decision that had temporarily halted a measure for which citizens had far surpassed the required number of signatures.
For all sorts of reasons, it’s hard to actually win a political debate.
Despite the hype and anticipation, they usually end up pretty even. Voters of each side see what they want to see. Each candidate has good moments. Bad moments.
1/
Highlights play back showing both in even amounts.
And the press, hesitant to declare a winner, usually casts them that way.
Last night was not even. It wasn’t covered as even.
Last night was a rout. And also a clinic.
For several reasons:
2/
Domination
For years now, Trump has won debates not by intellect or strategy or by making sense—but by being the dominant figure.
The one who took center stage and soaked up most of the attention.
3/
When I first called gerrymandered red states “Laboratories of Autocracy,” I wasn’t trying to be cute. And I wasn’t exagerrating.
It’s exactly how these corrupted statehouses and states operate.
1/
Just ask citizens of Ohio. Or Missouri. Or North Carolina. Or Florida. Or Indiana.
The same pattern plays out in all of them: 1) extreme gerrymandering empowers extremists to hijack the power of that state’s government, 2) they ram through policies
2/
that do not reflect the will of the people of that state (often, the opposite); but 3) they are so locked in, it’s nearly impossible for the people to throw them out.
A second pattern is that they are always learning and borrowing from one another’s worst tactics.
3/
MY FIRST WHITEBOARD: The Painful Lesson of American Democracy
A 🧵
It never fails.
I teach my election law course in the Fall.
Just as major elections are hitting the homestretch at the same time.
WATCH, RT, &
Which also means that stunts and shenanigans to suppress voters often begin happen in real-time, in the precise weeks that I am teaching about the worst of the suppression tactics of the past.
2/
The parallels and echoes—from purging and last-minute restrictions now, to similar tactics way back when—are always so blatantly obvious.
And with me hardly having to say the words, the lesson is so clear:
3/