Couple things 1. Body armor is > than “fitness” in a gunfight 2. Fitness is > than body armor for long term survival. 3. Buying good body armor is the single most important thing you can do today to increase survivability by tomorrow 4. Don’t listen to C/Is. Especially idiots
Body armor can save your life. Once a gunfight starts, it is chaos and random. Anyone telling you “body armor only covers 9% of your body”, “I can be a harder target to hit if I’m fast” or “I can only stop one round” have no idea what they are saying.
You absolutely can not dodge bullets, and you will absolutely never be “too quick” often enough. That is insane. Listen to yourself
“It doesn’t cover my head”…. You don’t have a brain anyway you’ll be fine
Don’t believe me? I wonder if we would have any takers if we went back to Omaha Beach and asked if they’d trade a minute slower mile time for some ESAPI plates
If you are talking about some sort of long term “Rogers Rangers Guerilla Band of Extraordinary Forest Fighters” then yes, cardio and fitness are more important.
But cardio and fitness take time. Body armor is immediate. Also, it is hard to run with a gaping hole in your chest
Cardio and fitness help you take the fight to the enemy. It helps you close with, or break contact with, the enemy. But that last 50m to the objective you will pray for a plate.
Buy one. Do cardio in it. If your plate carrier doesn’t have sweat stains you NGMI
Lastly… there is absolutely no one of literally any value saying you ONLY need a plate carrier. If you are arguing with someone who says that, or more likely than not, making it up, then you are the idiot same as them.
There are people here who invent fake problems
They want to sell you their “training” or be a “thought leader” when really they are just idiots. They have absolutely no idea what they are talking about, and try to convince you by posting some malapropos poverty induced counter-think straw man.
Don’t be dumb. Be smart
The hell did I say?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is by far the best scene in Last of the Mohicans.
Major Heyward leads a company of Highlanders (in reality the 35th Foot [Royal Sussex]) out of the trenches around Fort William Henry to act as a diversion for a messenger to run to Fort Edward and reinforcements.
It is a great moment of redemption for Major Heyward and the British Army.
On the trip north, Heyward had his command destroyed in the woods by the Huron. Unaccustomed to fighting in the close confines of the North American woodlands, Heyward and his men are made fools of
But here he is in his element. A company in line of battle, banging it out in open terrain.
Heyward stands there with no musket, just a useless pistol, moving his company around like they are an extension of himself.
He is no coward, not is he incompetent. Here he is a rock.
The world is full of information: some bad, some good, some deceitful. Making up one's own mind is the only true freedom we have. Sometimes it is wise to go along with the group, sometimes it is best to blaze your own path to glory.
Like at the Battle of Tannhäuser Gate
1. Like many ancient battles, the truth of Tannhäuser Gate has been lost to time. The story has been changed by both 13th Century bards and Wagner alike.
But the legend remains and the story, despite the wear of intervening centuries, refuses to be lost like tears in the rain
2. The name Tannhäuser is an old one, and dates to the pre-bronze age of Germany. The old Germany of witchcraft and pagans that would come to terrify the mighty Romans.
This is where our story begins, the dark forests of southern Germany in 1260 BC
What wins wars? Certainly sometimes superior logistics, weapons, or generals, but when no side has those advantages? What leads one side to crush their enemy mercilessly? Discipline, faith, and leadership. Like how white mercenaries ruled the 1960's battlefields of the Congo.
1/It is no surprise that trained, equipped, and well-led European armies slaughtered African tribal armies wherever they went. A tiny nation, Belgium was able to conquer a giant one like the Congo with nothing more than a professional army. Even Italy managed a colony: barely
2/ This isn't limited to Europeans. Shaka, the founder of the great Zulu empire, forged his tribal warriors, more used to ceremonial dance offs than the brutality of battle behind a spear into professionals. He organized his men trained them, developed new weapons, and conquered
Alright youse. Grab a chair and make sure you don’t mix up your guns while we clean, and wash your hands before you eat that powder is filthy.
Let’s talk German politics.
German had an election. Nobody won. But this always happens in Germany. So you have to form a coalition
It helps not to think of German parties as opposites of one another like in a 2 party US system: for example, the new CDU (led by Friedrich Merz, no relation) is no leaning more anti immigrant like AfD, but they differ on Germany’s place in the EU and foreign policy.
Likewise AfD and BSW are polar opposites in many ways; except they are both anti immigration. So what happens now.
A coalition must be formed to reach 50%. There are two options 1. Form what’s known as a Kenya Coalition (red, black, green… learn something) in the establishment