Far-UVC: Technology Update with an Untapped Potential to Mitigate Airborne Infectionshttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10704226/
A single, upper-room GUV fixture delivered the equivalent of 18–110 eACH, depending on the susceptibility of the test microbe and relative humidity ,whereas a single far-UVC fixture delivered 33–66 eACH
Far-UVC can be applied across a broader range of indoor settings and closer to breathing zones, making them potentially useful in public transportation and other settings while offering better protection from infectious transmission from nearby room occupants
Effective, energy-efficient air disinfection is a critical public health need. The three available technologies—ventilation, filtration, and GUV—vary greatly in their practical capacity to interrupt the airborne transmission of pathogens.
entilation and filtration improve air quality and offer some protection against infection but, in many scenarios, may not produce sufficient levels of equivalent ventilation to reduce transmission
GUV (whether upper room 254 nm or far-UVC 222 nm) provides the high eACH range needed to address airborne pathogens that are shed at high quanta emission rates (e.g., 5,000 quanta per hour for measles or 1,000 quanta per hour for SARS-CoV-2) (9).
Although well-functioning heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems are essential, GUV provides enhanced protection at a sustainable cost
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ventilation is a case-by-case situation and it could be very challenging, you give an example. The background noise is in the calculator i propose. You can use it to try a solution or a compromise for a specific situation.
For some challenging situation, UV will be a most 🧵
I encourage people to use calculation tools to find personalized solutions for their workplace, school, or child’s daycare, etc. I helped my friend find solutions, and it was very challenging.
Traffic noise was an issue, and we had to run tests to figure out what level of window opening was acceptable. Of course, reducing the window opening decreases the airflow (CFM). It’s not that easy, but not too complicated either.
I recently received a DM about the 45 dB figure I mentioned regarding noise levels in schools. This is a serious topic because noise pollution can significantly impact health and learning. Let me clarify where this figure comes from
🧵
The 45 dB figure is often discussed in the context of minimizing classroom noise to avoid disruptions and support effective learning. It’s a general reference rather than a strict standard.
For authoritative guidelines, the World Health Organization (WHO) and ANSI S12.60-2010 provide recommendations on noise levels. WHO suggests keeping noise below 35-40 dB to ensure a healthy and conducive learning environment.
Updated Air Purifier Analysis
Refined analysis for classrooms (38 dB background noise, 200 CFM, 28 students).
Focus on dust CADR for ASHRAE 241 and ensure total noise max 45 dB. Compare quieter vs. louder models with new data. Check it ou #ASHRAE241 #45dB
👇
Thanks to @joeyfox85 and other person, I’ve adjusted the analysis to reflect that #ASHRAE241 considers infectious aerosols as 0.3x smoke + 0.4x dust + 0.3x pollen. Intertek tests show 5% of the dust CADR. This adjustment ensures more accurate evaluation and easier to meet goals
I’ve also added some devices, including a few that are installed in schools across North America and selected by government agencies : Dyson HPO4, Trio plus, IQAir HealthPro Plus, Medify MA-112 and Honeywell HPA300