Mark Goldfeder Profile picture
Sep 18 24 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Dear @aoc and other useful idiots who only discover IHL if they think it hurts Israel:

No, Israel's attack did not violate international law, including your newfound darling 'AP II Article 7' rules against booby traps (which I bet you never heard of until today).

Here is why:
@AOC 1) Communication devices issued by terrorists to terrorists for terrorist purposes do not count as civilian objects. Period.
@AOC 2) The devices do not fall under any of the categories prohibited in Article 7, paragraph 1.
It's ok, I know you have not actually read it, so here you go:
ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treatie…
@AOC 3) Paragraph 2 prohibits using booby traps that are specifically designed and constructed to contain explosive material- not modifying a device, especially (see 1 above) if it is a military device.
@AOC 4) Paragraph 3 reminds us that even when permissible any such weapon must be placed "in the close vicinity of a military objective."
I think we can agree, no comment necessary.
@AOC Stay with me here, @RepAOC. I can type slower if necessary.
@AOC @RepAOC 5) The next rule we have to deal with is the principle of distinction. Did the attack specifically target combatants? Was there a military objective?
Check, and double-check.
ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treatie…
@AOC @RepAOC 6) How about proportionality? I am well aware that you demonstratively have no idea what that means () so why don't we keep it simple:
@AOC @RepAOC Would such an attacked be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects or a combination thereof which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage that is anticipated? Not a chance.
@AOC @RepAOC Israel (allegedly) literally blew the pants off hundreds of terrorists, and immobilized a large segment of a terrorist organization hellbent on the genocidal elimination of their country.
@AOC @RepAOC Reports say that a few civilians were tragically hurt as well. Absolutely tragic, but not in any way unlawful. Terrorists should not stand close to innocent civilians while carrying their terrorist comms.
@AOC @RepAOC Based on your own histrionics, and the frantic rants of other terrorist shills, the attack also had the desired effect on the psyche of Hezbollah and its supporters.
@AOC @RepAOC Ok, now are you ready for the big reveal? If this was not a case of illegal booby trapping, then what was it?
@AOC @RepAOC IF Israel did this, then it was perhaps the finest and cleanest act of sabotage in military history:
casebook.icrc.org/a_to_z/glossar…
"Sabotage is generally the work of individuals or small formations operating in enemy-controlled territory and taking advantage of clandestinity, surprise, and ruses of war. It is generally carried out with great precision and therefore does not usually harm the civilian population. The targets of sabotage must form part of the enemy’s material infrastructure, that is, they must be military objectives. To sum up, sabotage against the enemy is a lawful operation provided the legal rules for the choice of targets and the methods and means employed are respected."
@AOC @RepAOC To quote one actual IHL expert:
Now you might be asking yourself, @aoc: If Israel's actions were in fact lawful, targeted, and precise, and took out hundreds of terrorists who had been indiscriminately bombing them for months, why are you so upset? Simple.
@AOC @RepAOC The same reason you regularly ignore actual experts on warfare like @SpencerGuard and accuse Israel of anything you can google.

@AOC @RepAOC @SpencerGuard It is because you are an unrepentant antisemite who does not value Jewish life.
@AOC @RepAOC @SpencerGuard I do admire your tenacity- willing to constantly make a fool of yourself on the off chance it might hurt the Jews. (This clip, for example, never gets old)
@AOC @RepAOC @SpencerGuard But for now, take a step back and just look at the optics. You were silent for almost a year while Hezbollah indiscriminately bombed civilians. (FYI- if you care so much about international issues, they should have been disarmed in 2006 under UN Security Council Resolution 1701)
@AOC @RepAOC @SpencerGuard As soon as Israel strikes back, in a targeted fashion, you feel the need to respond.
@AOC @RepAOC @SpencerGuard You are usually a much better actress than this!
@AOC @RepAOC @SpencerGuard I feel your hatred might be blinding you. Try and do a little better.

And in the meantime, if you don't have anything smart to say, just say nothing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Goldfeder

Mark Goldfeder Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarkGoldfeder

Jul 19
No surprises in today's non-binding ICJ opinion about Israeli settlements:
The question (What are the legal consequences arising from the ongoing violation by Israel ...) presupposed the answer, and the answer was a restatement of its 2004 Wall opinion. And yet... 🧵
I am always surprised when the Court takes the time to give ahistorical lessons, especially when it does so as a way of avoiding important legal issues. For example:
Para. 53: On 14 May 1948, Israel proclaimed its independence with reference to the General Assembly resolution 181 (II); an armed conflict then broke out between Israel and a number of Arab States, and the Plan of Partition was not implemented.

False.
Read 28 tweets
May 22
Dear @Femi_Sorry,
I don't know you, and won't automatically call you an antisemite. But what you keep saying is actually a dangerously antisemitic form of victim blaming. Let me explain:
@Femi_Sorry Do you blame black people for racism?
@Femi_Sorry Do you tell rape victims they maybe should have covered up a little more?
Read 24 tweets
May 17
Dear @RepRashida,
The Nakba never ended because the Nakba never started. Enough with your falsified Middle East narrative. The modern history of Israel is not lost in the shrouds of time, and there are clear contemporaneous records that give lie to your words. Let me explain:
@RepRashida In 1922, the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine officially established an area in the Middle East to be a national home for the Jewish People and entrusted it to Great Britain.
Jewish people came from around the world to buy and cultivate land to further expand the existing Jewish communities that had remained in Israel as a continuous presence since Biblical times.
Read 24 tweets
Apr 22
Dear President Shafik,

Last week in the @WSJ you made the assertion/excuse that drawing First Amendment lines is "difficult" and no one should expect Universities to know how to do this properly.

That is absurd and a complete abdication of your responsibility. Let me explain:
@WSJ There is nothing incredibly complicated about enforcing the First Amendment on campus or anywhere else, and we should absolutely expect Universities, like Columbia, to understand its limits.
@WSJ The head of your antisemitism task force is a former law school dean for crying out loud!
Read 26 tweets
Apr 16
Tomorrow Congress votes on H. Res. 883, which
expresses the sense of the House that the slogan "from the river to the sea" is antisemitic and should be condemned. The bipartisan effort, led by @RepDesposito and joined by @RepJoshG and @JaredEMoskowitz is important. Here's why: Image
Ever since October 7, debates have been raging about whether the phrase “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” should or should not always be considered a call for the extermination of Israel and the murder of all the Jews who live there—
@RepDesposito @RepJoshG @JaredEMoskowitz @HouseGOP @HouseDemocrats @themishpacha @JewishPress @5TJT @JewishJournal @JewishStarNY @StandWithUs @ShaiDavidai @Ostrov_A You know, the way Hamas uses it, and has always used it, and has even used it to describe October 7:

memri.org/reports/hamas-…
Read 13 tweets
Apr 11
Representative Anthony D'Esposito has introduced the Define to Defeat Act, which clarifies civil rights protections for the Jewish community. It is a crucial tool for fighting back against the rise of anti-Jewish hate, and we cannot thank @RepDesposito enough for his leadership.
@RepDesposito The bill builds on the wonderful momentum that has been generated by the Antisemitism Awareness Act introduced by the great @RepMikeLawler, which does this in Title VI and has wide bipartisan support.
@RepDesposito @RepMikeLawler Unfortunately, since October 7th, it has only become clearer that Jewish people need this clarification to fix an existing equal protection deficit in other anti-discrimination contexts as well.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(