A couple of yrs ago our lead pastor disqualified himself from ministry. A very difficult time for our church. I wasn't one of our elders then, but as a devoted and concerned member -- and even as a close friend of our sr. pastor -- I appreciated how the elders led us...
1. He was fired immediately upon discovery.
You might want to ensure your church bylaws allow for such swift action.
2. The membership was informed at a special called members' meeting immediately after the next Sunday service.
Many discovered through the grapevine before that but this was the quickest way to personally deliver the news and explain in a way that was open to response/questions
3. The elders were clear about the nature of the sin.
There were no vague insinuations or fuzzy euphemisms. We didn't get all the nitty-gritty details, of course, but they were specific about the sin, who it was with, how long it had gone on, etc.
4. The elders were available and transparent with members (and those in membership process) who had questions/concerns.
They took some hits about "how could this happen on your watch?" but they were open, honest, and available. They didn't try to cover anything or avoid.
5. At the next regular members' meeting, the elders recommended the church formally discipline the (now) former pastor.
6. Throughout the process, the pastors sought to care for his wife (who continued to attend the church).
The goal was for her to know we supported her (no matter what) and were interested in her well-being and in his repentance/accountability.
7. We continued to grow even during this painful process and during the 2 years we went without a lead preacher. When I became an elder I asked folks if it gave them any caution before joining and nobody said yes. Multiple said the transparency of the elders encouraged them.
(Several of those folks mentioned coming from churches where pastors would "disappear," usually for suspected disqualifying reasons, but nobody would ever communicate that to the church and everything was secretive.)
I'm in awe of the guys who shepherded us through that season. None of them had pastored a church before. But they kept their noses in their Bibles and their arms around the flock and tended to us really well. It was an honor to join their team in the next season.
Not an enjoyable experience, to be sure, and it's not one I enjoy bringing up. I love that brother, and I'm happy to share he's walking in repentance, his marriage restored, theyre engaged in another gospel-loving local church. But perhaps some of these lessons can help you. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. There's no need to anathematize Alistair Begg or any other good brother/sister who affirms the biblical's sexual ethic but disagrees on this application of Christian compassion.
2. While orthodoxy does not leave evangelicals to be "free to disagree" on something the Bible directly addresses, given explicit objection to homosexuality, we may be free to disagree on the kind of counsel Begg gave the grandmother at his church.
Through teaching, coaching, and traveling I take in a lot of preaching. Here are a few consistent things I keep seeing . . .
1. No clear homiletical structure. Just b/c you're going "verse by verse" doesn't mean you should give us a running commentary with no clear through-line or thematic center.
I urge students/residents to employ a homiletical outline to give themselves and their audience clarity about the text and to make their exposition more proclamational/declarative.
I am really, really, really trying to finish a book ms. on "gospel drift" right now. One reflection from the work: drift from gospel-centrality happens often subtly but usually runs along rivulets begun in three subtle ways:
1. A conflation of the gospel with its entailments/implications. (In this way the social gospel of the "left" is not dissimilar from the legalism of the "right")
2. A distrust of the power of the gospel, traded in for an inordinate trusting in the law to "rise to the occasion" of contemporary challenges/threats. (In this way we see the pragmatism of the attractional church still hold sway among those who've abandoned "attractionalism")
So we saw both *Oppenheimer* and *Barbie* today, and I have some thoughts. 1/
First, on Oppenheimer. If you're interested in seeing it, you should know there is a graphic s*x scene. Based on the subject matter of the movie, the promotional material, and the director's track record, I did not expect that at all. Felt totally out of left field.
The movie itself is interesting, but not something I'd ever rewatch. A loaded cast doing some of their best work. Some nifty writing. But it's not a masterpiece (as hyped) and not even, IMO, top 5 Nolan.
Heard this morning that Steven has gone on into glory. Prayers for his wife and the church at Middletown Springs, VT are appreciated, I'm sure. Can I tell you about Steven's remarkable journey to Jesus? . . .
I remember his 1st Sunday in 2011. He stood out b/c he was by himself. 62 yrs old, I think. Long gray beard, flannel shirt, "work jeans." He was dressed liked a lot of 20-something hipsters except he came by it honestly. He looked like he'd just come in out of the woods
I went to meet him after service and he said, "You know, this is my first time in a church building in 44 years." I said, "No weddings, no funerals?" He said, "No. I grew up Catholic. Left home and religion when I was 18. Didn't want to have anything more to do with it."
3 keys to endurance in pastoral ministry: 1) Trust that the God who is sovereign loves you.
It's a good thing to believe God is in control, but it's empowering to believe he is also in fact love.
2) Friendships that are nourishing and a marriage (if applicable) that is strong.
Loneliness is wearying and withering. We are more tempted to quit when we feel all alone.
3) Ability to envision the green pasture beyond the woods.
Call it belief in "future grace," call it what you want. When you're in the weeds, so to speak, it's difficult to picture *not* being in them. Hopelessness seeps in . . .