The deliberate destruction of evidence is not a mistake; it is an act of evasion. The Vistomail and AnonymousSpeech websites were intentionally shut down after solicitors accessed the Satoshi account, proving that COPA will stop at nothing to hide the truth.
Truth is a value that cannot be compromised. The shutdown of these sites, which referenced Craig Wright (spelt incorrectly of course) by name, is evidence of a deliberate attempt to conceal facts crucial to the case. COPA’s actions reflect not a defence but an admission of guilt.
Worse still, the impartiality of this court has been compromised. David Pearce, a party linked to COPA, met with Justice Mellor before the judgment. This is not justice; it is an abandonment of principle.
The integrity of the process has been shattered.
The integrity of the process has been shattered.
Justice must be rational. Mr. Madden’s forensic report has now been exposed as a product of incompetence or, worse, wilful deception.
His failure to account for the preserved evidence of the websites demonstrates that he is nothing more than a mouthpiece for COPA.
His failure to account for the preserved evidence of the websites demonstrates that he is nothing more than a mouthpiece for COPA.
The courts must uphold reality as their standard. COPA’s destruction of evidence and Mr. Madden’s flawed analysis are not just errors; they are deliberate violations of the objective truth. These facts must be addressed, and the judgment revisited.
We seek not favours but justice.
The court must admit this new evidence, for to ignore it would be to sanction the destruction of truth. It is time to hold those accountable who thought they could evade the facts.
The court must admit this new evidence, for to ignore it would be to sanction the destruction of truth. It is time to hold those accountable who thought they could evade the facts.
David Pearce, a COPA representative, met privately with Justice Mellor before the judgment. This is not merely unethical; it is a betrayal of the very concept of justice. Porter v Magill [2001] UKHL 67 teaches us that even the appearance of bias undermines the entire judicial process.
A fair-minded observer, informed of these meetings, could reasonably conclude that there was a real possibility of bias. This case law is a pillar of impartiality, a standard that has been clearly breached.
A fair-minded observer, informed of these meetings, could reasonably conclude that there was a real possibility of bias. This case law is a pillar of impartiality, a standard that has been clearly breached.
In R v Sussex Justices, Ex parte McCarthy [1924] 1 KB 256, the principle was established that justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done. The secrecy surrounding these meetings between Pearce and the judge reeks of impropriety. It gives rise to the legitimate perception that the court has acted unfairly.
This is not a question of a single misstep; this is the systemic corrosion of justice, where influence is wielded behind closed doors. Pearce’s association with COPA and his private discussions with the judge render the process itself suspect. No ruling based on such compromised proceedings can be trusted.
The law must be a reflection of objective reality, not the arbitrary whims of those who seek advantage through hidden channels. These meetings, undisclosed during the proceedings, have only come to light after the judgment.
This demands immediate review, as the foundational principle of fairness has been shattered.
This demands immediate review, as the foundational principle of fairness has been shattered.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
