I want to dedicate this short thread to M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round(EPR) 5.56.
EPR is probably the best general-purpose 5.56 rifle round in existence right now, with performance equalling or EXCEEDING 7.62x51mm M80 ball.🧵
M855 (SS109) has legendarily inconsistent performance at range. Most of its performance comes from yaw instability, which primarily occurs at short range.
Without yaw, it can pass harmlessly through a target, which was a significant issue encountered in Afghanistan.
This yaw also has a negative impact on accuracy.
Partially in response to these issues in Iraq and especially Afghanistan, the U.S. Army developed M855A1 EPR(the other impetus was providing a low-lead projectile to reduce environmental impacts).
The EPR projectile layout may be one of the greatest developments in modern small arms technology.
While my expertise is not in small arms technology, the improvements are well-documented.
The first order of business was to decouple performance at range from yaw. Though it still yaws, it yaws far less and is not impacted by a lack of yaw during flight.
Additionally, due to the construction of the projectile (drawn copper jacket around the back rather than over the front), accuracy is far higher than M855.
Terminal effects and barrier penetration, though, are the greatest strengths of EPR. They wanted the projectile to stop as early in a soft target as possible, but not to stop in a hard target.
The results are incredible. The consistency is far, far higher than M855, and barrier penetration at range is at least doubled.
M855A1 has superior barrier penetration to 7.62x51mm M80 Ball. Let that sink in for a minute.
And don't get me started on M80A1 EPR...
However, it's not JUST barrier penetration that is better than M80. EPR's soft target performance is ALSO better than that of M80.
I won't go into details because I know not all who follow me are interested in small arms (and details can be grisly), but the bottom line is that EPR stops quickly and consistently in soft targets better than almost any 5.56 to date (ideal) WITHOUT being stopped by hard targets.
The feedback from soldiers was overwhelmingly positive. The delta between 855 and 855A1 is night and day.
What is so critical is that the EPR design has been able to properly harness the effectiveness of 5.56 (and it scales to other calibers well), and can provide, for the first time, a true all-purpose small-caliber round.
Until this point, most rifle caliber projectiles have required trade-offs to achieve performance, but not the M855A1 EPR. It is a class leader in all respects.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you want to try to optically track a target with damn near zero contrast, be my guest.
The Japanese Navy found that at night the human eye struggled to pick up ships over about five miles. A ship on the horizon is a significantly bigger target than a B-2 or F-117.
For a computer, greater signal to noise ratios are required to effectively track a target. This is why imaging infrared is preferable to optical contrast. Shown below is the last few seconds of flight of an AIM-9X.
This uses imaging infrared to detect and track the target.
Since the end of the Cold War in 1991, the US Navy's ability to conduct air superiority and offensive strikes has been slowly diminishing. Today, we stand at an inflection point, where the F/A-XX program to deliver a new strike fighter to the Navy is in Jeopardy.
🧵
This thread is a pitch for a congressional write-in campaign. The first part is a history of the degradation of the Navy's air wing. The second part is an analysis of a recent oversight hearing. The last post of this thread contains instructions for emailing your representatives.
In the 1980s, the A-6F was proposed for development. This was to be an updated A-6E including modern avionics, new engines, and AMRAAM. This would have provided the Navy with a relatively low cost program, retaining a two-seat crew with a large payload and good mission systems.
Some very interesting stuff going on here with the Shenyang aircraft. 🧵
Exhaust appears visually similar to the F-22's with 2D thrust vectoring and shrouding. Wing shaping is nothing particularly special but seems good. Like JH-36, it retains some conventional control surfaces.
The all moving wingtips are a novel solution. I don't know what the trade offs are but they must be at least somewhat worth it. Potentially these are considered lower risk, higher strength, or more effective than the semi-morphing control surfaces on the JH-36.
The intake design is interesting. Unlike JH-36, which uses caret intakes underneath and uses a DSI above, the Shenyang aircraft uses what appears to be two DSIs below. The gear appears to fold sideways into a bay ABOVE the side bays, giving it a J-20-esque four bay arrangement.
With the renewed interest in the Europa wars, this may be the best time to bring up the unusual short ranged missile developed for space-superiority craft.
The AIM-95E "Europa Agile," the only missile designed for operation in deep space AND within thin atmospheres.🧵
First off, I apologize in advance for the lack of photos on this topic. All existing photos of Agile are of the ones designed in the 1970s for operation within Earth's atmosphere. Therefore, you will have to imagine some of these changes to the system.
The Agile for aerial use was cancelled in the mid 1970s after about $50m was wasted developing several different airframes and seekers. This spelled the end for the program as most know it, but this would only be the starting point for the Europa Agile.
For my entire life I have been taught about the importance of effective searches. Since May 2024, I have fought with an unwanted feature that has made my experience worse.
A rant about "AI Overview," AI assisted search and their impact on using Google as a tool for research.🧵
Google has billed these features as "taking the legwork out of searching" and "able to answer complex questions." This is a bald faced lie.
The AI has wasted more time than it has saved me, lied about results, and forced me to learn methods to get around it rather than to use it.
I do a lot of research using keywords that I need matched exactly. For example, right now, I was looking up the specific thrust of the General Electric F414 engine used in the X-59, an experimental plane in development for NASA. This should be a simple question to answer.
For years, I've been working towards building a website to house all of my opinions and research. Today, it goes live with the launch article: Jet Fighter Generations Aren't Real.
This website comes with a major change in how I produce and share content, so please read. 🧵
First, here's a link to the article. I would have put it in the tweet above, but this website hates external links, and so it wouldn't have been shown to many of you.
For this reason (among others), I politely ask you to spread the word about this website.greatdefensesite.org/articles/fight…
X has unfortunately limited the topics I can present, the formats I can present them in, and the wording I can use to make a point. This website, for all its claims of free speech, has countless filters and algorithm features that harm post visibility. I'm tired of that.