Jess Ralston Profile picture
Sep 27 β€’ 6 tweets β€’ 2 min read β€’ Read on X
Ratcliffe, the UK's last coal power station, is about to power down for the last time πŸ”₯

It's got me reminiscing about all the times we were told this would cause blackouts

πŸ‘€ much like we hear about phasing out gas for renewables today Image
Over years, there's been many headlines on coal & blackouts:

2013: "Britain faces going back to bad old days of blackouts as power stations close"

2015: "When coal power stops, how will Britain’s home fires keep burning?"

2018: "How will we keep the lights on without coal?"
2020 "Why Britain still needs coal-fired power stations"

2024 "It would be madness to blow up our last coal-fired power station. We might need it to keep the lights on"

This week 😳 "Britain’s last coal-fired power station is closing...energy cuts in 2028 are now a possibility"
Scary stuff, right?

But the reality is π™šπ™­π™©π™§π™šπ™’π™š π™¬π™šπ™–π™©π™π™šπ™§ is behind most power cuts

& the last severe UK blackout was caused by lightning hitting the transmission infrastructure and causing a gas power plant & windfarm to go offline
...nothing to do with increased uptake of renewables

National Grid Energy System Operator 'confident' it can manage a clean power grid

Q2 2024: we reached a new record of renewables generation at almost 52%

& renewables' share of generation is only going ⬆️
(πŸ“ˆ DESNZ) Image
Ratcliffe closing on the 30th is a πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ success story overseen by Governments of all stripes

& shows other countries it can be done. We should continue setting this example in the clean power transition

& reminding ourselves that blackout scaremongering doesn't stop progress. Image

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Jess Ralston

Jess Ralston Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jessralston2

Sep 3
Oh dear, some pretty major mistakes made in this @Telegraph article on the Government renewables auction results today.

Some mistakes have been spotted and it's already undergone hefty revisions (see below) - but it remains fundamentally misleading.

Here's what it got wrong 🧡
Image
Image
First, the original mistakes.

The 'Β£357' added to every household's bills was calculated from a figure within the first article

it reported the National Grid Electricity System Operator (ESO) puts the value of the subsidy applications for offshore wind at Β£10bn...BUT Image
The Β£10bn figure that the whole article is based on is inaccurately reported.

It's calculated from the administrative strike price from March 2024, NOT the final strike prices which were reduced by around 20% in the auction

So the Β£10bn figure is higher than it should be.
Read 10 tweets
Aug 22
Some dodgy claims about North Sea oil & gas circulating in the media today, thanks to an open letter co-ordinated by @OEUK_

Two main points I'd like to debunk, nicely summarised by OEUK chief David Whitehouse on @BBCr4today this morning... 🧡
"We want to maintain our own energy security by providing our own oil & gas and those very companies are now investing in that broader energy transition." πŸ€”

1) This suggestion that domestic O&G production contributes to UK energy security is misleading
O&G produced in the UK does not belong to the UK, and there is no guarantee it will be consumed here

The UKCS is owned by corporations that sell their O&G on international markets - nothing compels them to keep their O&G in the UK or consumed by the UK.

Read 6 tweets
Aug 8
Yesterday the @Telegraph published a comment piece by Viscount Matt Ridley about renewable energy, littered with misleading claims.

What to make of it? 🧡 Image
Ridley says: "Miliband... wants to double onshore wind, quadruple offshore and treble solar capacity. If he has a plan to deal with the resulting volatility & intermittency, he has yet to reveal it."

Or maybe Ridley has yet to find it? Lab's mission doc:

labour.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
Image
πŸ‘€"Invest in carbon capture & storage, hydrogen & long-term energy storage to ensure sufficient zero-emission back-up power and storage for extended periods without wind or sun, while maintaining a strategic reserve of backup gas power stations to guarantee security of supply."
Read 12 tweets
Jul 30
An opinion piece in the @Telegraph on Friday by Lord Lilley posed a series of (frankly misleading) 'questions' about clean energy

(Lilley is a former trustee at climate-denial group Global Warming Policy Foundation)

Let's try and answer them for him... 🧡 Image
Q: "If wind and solar are cheaper than gas, why subsidise them?"

Government schemes ("subsidies") provide important financial incentives to developers to take on the upfront construction costs of wind and solar (which can be more than gas).
These schemes enable massive cost savings once assets are operational, and so wind and solar are cheaper than gas on a lifetime basis

Subsidies help get them built in the first place, delivering those lifetime cost savings to consumers

& delivering energy security benefits too.
Read 19 tweets
Jun 21
Some questionable comments made by the Executive Chairman of Ithaca Energy (an oil and gas company with interests in the North Sea)

on @BBCr4today this morning, in relation to the Finch judgment by the Supreme Court yesterday

A short 🧡...
Myerson claimed: "Approx 70% of British energy supply is O&G. Now that is a reality that is unlikely to change significantly over the next few years, some may say decades."

@thecccuk shows by 2050, oil demand will fall by 85%, and natural gas by 70%

theccc.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
Myerson said "The question is do we produce it ourselves, or do we import oil and gas from abroad?"

This implies that new licences could provide enough oil & gas to meet UK demand

But in the past 13 years, hundreds of new licences have resulted in just 16 days’ worth of gas πŸ€”
Read 9 tweets
Jun 12
The @Telegraph is reporting comments from GMB that Labour's Clean Power by 2030 target is "unviable" and will lead to "power cuts and blackouts".

How accurate are those claims? 🧡 Image
Firstly, what's the difference between Labour and Conservative plans?

Labour's target is 100% clean power by 2030

Conservatives' target is 95% clean power by 2030

= not significantly different in scope.

bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
On cost?

@AuroraER_Oxford found Labour’s target would require Β£116bn investment over the next 11 years, while Tories' target would require Β£105bn

So the difference between those plans is around Β£1bn per year

that's less than 0.1% of the UK’s total expenditure for 2024-25πŸ‘€
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(