"For the first few days, the harbor master said he was “not allowed to say a thing”. But today, John Anker Nielsen can reveal that four or five days before the Nord Stream blasts, he was out with the rescue service on Christiansø because there were some ships with switched-off radios. They turned out to be American naval vessels, and when the rescue service approached, they were told by Naval Command to turn back.
Therefore, the harbor master has some faith in the theory that American star journalist Seymour Hersh, among others, has put forward without any documentation: that the US was behind the sabotage. The Americans have these small unmanned submarines that can solve any task, John Anker Nielsen has been told"
Full paywalled article here. The harbor master isn't making this up. He wasn't alone on the rescue vessel ordered to stay clear of the American warships.
The little rescue boat at Christiansö was just checking up on some ships because thy didn't respond on radio. It was around the same time that the US Navy convoy led by USS Kearsage passed, but they moved at high speed and had AIS on.
I found a rescue vessel which left Christiansö late afternoon on the 21:st of Sept 2022, and headed in the direction of the northern explosions sites. It stopped half way for about 10 minutes (yellow pin) , 730PM before turning back.
Actually, the rescue trip of John Anker Nielsen came close to the USS Kearsarge convoy, and the US navy ships turned on their AIS about 15 minutes after the encounter.
John Anker started his trip towards the American war ships at 6:43PM on September 21, 2022. USS Kearsarge was "dark" at the time, and about 40 km away IF it held the same course and speed as it did after turning on AIS at 7:13PM. Where was Kearsarge when dark? John must have seen it on radar, or heard about it some other way before setting out. I will ask of course.
Here's a film dated Sept 19 2022 of Kearsarge leaving Gdansk. The trip to the site where she turned on AIS is about 12 hours at normal cruise speed, but she spent about 60 hours to get there, so there was time for other activities.
Seems like Arlington came from the North, having visited Visby the day before (September 20, 2022).
If Kearsarge just wanted to go home from Gdansk, it would have been closer to go south of Bornholm like the US military tanker McKinney did around the same time.
John Anker Nielsen responded to me by email, saying he "has nothing to add beyond what he said to Politikken"
Bummer.
for completeness. US destroyer USS Paul Ignatius was in Gdynia (right next to Gdansk in Poland) on the day of the explosions (September 26). Then it went out to the crime scene, masquerading in AIS messages as a greek container vessel. See red dots in graph below
We know that it was Paul Ignatius "guarding the crime scene" because a reporter on board the danish investigator dive boat wrote "they could hear the radar cranking on Paul Ignatius"
Paul Ignatius finally left the Baltics on October 18. All of the ship movements documented in this thread were known and reported on Twitter soon after the explosions. The only "news" is that US Navy behaved strange near one of the the explosion sites on September 21, causing the rescue service at Christiansö to check up on them.
The big American warships leaving the explosion area on the evening Sept 21 were replaced by Danish and Swedish warships allegedly chasing Russian ships. Did they know about the bombs?
In December 2022, it was reported that a satellite company had found some "dark ships" in the Nord Stream rupture area a few days before the explosions. The reporting insinuated they were Russians, but considering that they found no other dark ships in the satellite SAR images, what they saw were likely the Americans.
1/ Wow, Nord Stream insurers Lloyds&Arch just filed an amended defense document which reveals technical details confirming a fifth Nord Stream bomb, which failed to break the NS1B line, placed just 90 meters from the successful bomb on NS1 line A.
2/ It's hilarious that Lloyds&Arch know that all of the bombs were placed on field joints. The successful Nord Stream 1 bombs unleashed propulsive forces from the gas which catapulted the pipeline segments and debris over an area 250 meters long and 50 meters wide. Only the investigation which recovered debris and analyzed explosive residue could know the exact bomb placements on these sites. From what I have heard, not even Nord Stream has access to this classified information. But apparently Lloyds has.
1/ Nord Stream AG has amended its insurance claim on Lloyds&Arch with technical informations which point to a previously unreported fifth bomb. Read about "The Dent":
2/ "The Dent" is located on the "B-String" of Nord Stream 1, and very close to the location of the bomb on the A-String of Nord Stream 1 in the Swedish EEZ (red marker here)
3/ The Dent is only 15 cm deep, and in my expedition we couldn't see it on our sonar maps. But creating a 15cm dent on a 27mm thick steel pipeline is requires a lot of force. Most likely, it was another bomb.
1/ There seem to be two dominating narratives describing who the Nord Stream sabotage was planned and executed.
One blames Ukraine for sending 6 commandos on a sailboat to blow it up.
The other, based on Seymour Hersh reporting, assumes the USA was directly involved and did it with more advanced military equipment and personell.
2/ When I made my expedition to the explosion sites, I was specifically looking for fingerprints of a more advanced operation, but I felt I couldn't find any. On the contrary, the seemingly crude damage and the mistake of placing two of 4 bombs on the same string, pointed to a low budget operation.
3/ But an oblong-shaped directional charge, custom designed for a cylindrical pressurized tube, doesn't sound very low budget to me. It definitely doesn't sound like something you would assemble from raw explosives on a sailboat, leaving traces on the kitchen table.
1/ I've seen new footage and 3D analysis suggests that the explosive devices used Nord Stream sabotage were more expertly designed than I previously thought.
2/ The footage is not new. It was taken from an offshore survey vessel called Glomar Worker, which was chartered by Nord Stream 2 AG in Feb/March 2023.
3/ Nord Stream 2 made a summary document of their findings from the Glomar expedition and reported it to authorities in Sweden and Denmark. I have received this document, and it makes me rethink which type of bomb was used to rupture Nord Stream.
BREAKING: The "defense" of Nord Stream AG's insurance companies has been filed.
LLoyds and Arch argue that the damage was inflicted by, or under order of, a GOVERNMENT , and therefore they don't need pay. -->
I have requested the documents from the court and I'm making them available here. The defense filing has a lot of references to the claim doc so I publish download links to both:
Paragraph 22.3 : "It's customary in the energy market for cover for war risks to be confined to floating assets (which can be moved away from hostilities) "
How would we know that hostilities were coming to the Baltic? Because Biden told us?
1/One underreported mystery of Nord Stream is who chartered the huge Norwegian offshore ship to visit all explosion sites of Nord Stream between November 20 and November 30 2022.
2/ Normand spent many hours over each of the explosion sites and its movements seem to support dive operations.
3/ On the morning of November 23, it was precisely above the NS2AS site where we found the boot.