As a disabled law professor who has benefited from accommodations, I vehemently reject this article's claims. The rise in accommodations isn't fraud—it's progress. It means more disabled students are accessing higher education. This is cause for celebration, not suspicion. (1/5)
Let's be crystal clear: Accommodations aren't charity or cheating—they're legal rights that level the playing field. Suggesting otherwise is misguided and ableism . I strongly recommend reviewing the ADA before making such discriminatory assertions. (2/5)
We're nowhere near too many accommodations. Countless students are still fighting for basic access. Our duty is to remove barriers, not create new ones based on unfounded skepticism. The real issue is that we need to do more, not less. (3/5)
I'm thrilled to see more students seeking accommodations. It means our doors are finally opening wider. As someone who's lived this experience, I can attest: accommodations don't lower standards—they enable us to meet them. (4/5)
Apologies for the delayed response (hurricane aftermath), but this couldn't wait. To my disabled students and colleagues: I see you, I'm with you, and I'll continue advocating for your right to be here. (5/5)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 2012, 36 states listed parental disability as grounds for termination of parental rights. I just finished a state-by-state analysis and found that 36 states still list parental disability as grounds for termination of parental rights! In other words, nothing has changed!
While there has been successful legislative advocacy, including great legislation, states continue to include parental disability as grounds for TPR.
This number jumps to 43 states if you include substance use disorder, which I think you should because it is covered by the ADA.