Let's talk about JD Vance's approach in the debate. It's it's soft fash and it's a way of mainstreaming "traditional family" fascist aesthetics. A short 🧵:
1.) Soft speaking is prized as a rhetorical skill. It makes social violence more palatable (in the family and nation). It's more likely to draw women in (see also the pink tie). The contrast is when he talked over the female moderators and flashed anger at being fact-checked.
2.) His repeated strategy of pointing to alleged similarities to Walz is designed to move the Dems right and manufactures consent for the GOP agenda.
3.) Calling Walz by his first name produced an implied intimacy but also equality between the two men's accomplishments, despite the fact that Vance is wildly unqualified. He's the Dan Quayle of the moment.
4.) Trying to be chummy in a gentler voice produces a softer fash alongside the lies about his support for a pregnancy registry, a national abortion ban, and forced labor for grandma (who will now be raising the grandkids, despite the fact that he's slashing Medicare)
5.) Aesthetically, we see this in the fash women with Sarah Huckabee Sanders and her prairie dresses or with Casey DeSantis and her Disney princess schtick. Given the attention to Vance's goth eyeliner, the pink tie and soft speech attempted to normalize his violence.
6.) Given that Vance lies like he breathes, this was an attempt to create some aesthetic coherence to his completely unmoored and opportunistic politics. But you can't put lipstick on a pig, as we learned in 2008 (that was forever ago 🙄).
7.) Don't get it twisted, though: Vance is the most overtly bloodthirsty candidate at the top of a presidential ticket since Andrew Jackson.
8.) The sexual politics of fascism is actually quite widely studied & the extremely oppressive natalism, restrictions on contraception and abortion, support for misogynist violence, and anti-immigrant sentiment converge in race/sex panic to justify widespread violence.
9.) His wife functioned a prop to justify the hypermasculine worldview, particularly as he distanced himself from any responsibility for housework/childcare/balancing the family with labor. He doesn't see himself as a father but as a breeder with echoes of Musk & other fash dads.
9.) It's no wonder that they are all so preoccupied with the slur "cuck." It speaks to the internal dynamics of white masculinity in the fash moment. They're all so unmoored and anxious about being exposed.
10.) This was the dynamic at midcentury because J. Edgar Hoover had so much sexual dirt on men operating in the political sphere and he used it as interpersonal (and sometimes political) leverage against them.
11.) This dynamic around "cucks" is just insecure white masculinity peacocking for each other trying to outdo the most extreme version of themselves. This is why the contrast with Walz was painful at times to watch.
12.) The soft fash is a mask for the racial and sexual violence:
10.) It's no wonder that they are all so preoccupied with the slur "cuck." It speaks to the internal dynamics of white masculinity in the fash moment. They're all so unmoored and anxious about being exposed.
11.) This was the dynamic at midcentury because J. Edgar Hoover had so much sexual dirt on men operating in the political sphere and he used it as interpersonal (and sometimes political) leverage against them.
12.) This dynamic around "cucks" is just insecure white masculinity peacocking for each other trying to outdo the most extreme version of themselves. This is why the contrast with Walz was painful at times to watch. But soft fash is THE mask for the racial and sexual violence.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thinking a lot about how Tim Walz harnesses liberal sentimentality about citizenship and how odd it is that pets are such a focus in this election. Cats are central to moment's liberal sentimentality because they are part of "women's culture." A short 🧵:
Swift is also what I call a "focusing figure" of the moment, harnessing national feelings about female success, girlhood, reparative relationships with men (Swiftie dads).
I wrote a bit about how the Harris/Walz campaign is indebted to Swift's Eras tour for harnessing national sentimentality into arenas across the country.
The choice of Walz as VP is important as a policy/skills/compatibility decision as it is a vibe shift for a few reasons. A thread.
1.) The White Dudes for Kamala call was watershed in white men thinking together about how white masculinity has been impacted by MAGA politics.
2.) [Het] white men, in particular, want different options for how to BE white men. They want to be softer. Happier. More connected. Better parents. They want to support queer kids. They want happier wives. They are doing more carework and have fewer skills.
I really don't think people have any idea about how crypto/tech finance capital is reshaping markets, including: news, polling, and elections. The shift from Murdock to Thiel is the story here, not "dems in disarray."
The problem is the role of SPECULATION in markets. This is what is driving anonymous donors and dems to push for Biden's ouster alongside news media and polls that have been subsumed by tech bro capital.
The data is bad, it's pushing new modes of speculation/financialization, and the genpop has no idea basically what I'm even talking about. But sure, pivoting to a new candidate without a campaign in a box is a great idea.
1.) I'm about to tape a piece about #WVUmistake with @PBS and one thing I want to talk about is the destruction of the master's degree in public admin.
2.) Here's their program description.
3.) Can we talk about what happens when the oligarchs and consultants gut the pipeline to public service??
1.) So, higher ed admins are chattering about the US News college rankings. WaPo says the "rankings are scrambled" as the "formula changes." The rankings are absurd, so why should we care?
BECAUSE ALL OF THE METRICS FOR HIGHER ED ARE CHANGING. A 🧵
2.) US News CEO says new metrics focus on POSTGRADUATE EARNINGS and DEBT.
Why does this matter?
BECAUSE RICH [WHITE] KIDS FROM PRIVATE [WHITE] SCHOOLS AT PRIVATE [WHITE] UNIVERSITIES WILL HAVE HIGHER EARNINGS AND LESS DEBT.
3.) It is no coincidence that METRICS ARE CHANGING AFTER AFFIRMATIVE ACTION after the SCOTUS decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College.
All eyes are on #WVU and I want to talk to the professoriate about how to navigate this extremely anti-intellectual moment. I know it's frustrating and scary and the anxiety is terrible, but we must face this head-on.
(Yet another) thread.
1.) Silence is deadly. You must speak. Even if it's hard. Even if it doesn't change the immediate thing in front of you. Speaking out manages the anxiety of stasis and it helps build a community of resistance. <---- THIS IS ESSENTIAL TO BUILD A NEW THING.
2.) Things decay and rebuild. Ed is no different. Understand that this is a transitional moment (for higher ed, global capital, public health, etc.). In rhetoric, we call this a "recursive pattern," it ebbs and flows. We have been here before and we will be here again.