I've just read – officially skim-read – 733 pages of Boris Johnson's memoir, Unleashed. Here's a mini-thread of a few thoughts. But as a tl;dr – it's long, often rambling, packed with filler, and shows a complete lack of self-awareness or self-reflection. 1/
The most obviously self-fooling elements are on Partygate and his departure. Johnson insists he did nothing wrong over the parties, and blames Dominic Cummings and Lee Cain for "orchestrating" the issue. He insists he would have won the next election if not deposed 2/
Johnson reels off a series of reasons why he thinks Tory MPs wanted him out, including a desire for change, and that some were "worried I would win" and not give them ministerial posts 3/
Johnson's musings on Chris Pincher, the scandal that finally undid him, are telling. He says he knew all about Pincher's reputation but that he thought his behaviour was "unbecoming rather than bullying or inexcusable". 4/
More widely, other chapters are enormously self-serving and self-focused. The one about Nazanin Zagari-Ratcliffe should be titled, "Nazanin: why I was the real victim" (he was unfairly blamed and could have got her out of Iran earlier if not blocked) 5/
Similarly, a section on the massive cock-up over A level gradings, which caused huge stress for many thousands of families, is predicated around the inconvenience it caused because he had to cut short a much-needed holiday 5/
As a book rather than a guide to his character, it's also not great. Very long, and with whole parts even his die-hard fans will find a bit of a slog. Do we need a chapter on the new Routemaster bus? One about his views on girls' education? His thoughts about Libya? 6/
Johnson can be an engaging writer, but this feels like being fed about ten years of his Telegraph columns in one go, and it's a bit much. One obvious comparison book – Rory Stewart's Politics on the Edge – is 100x better written 7/
To continue the comparison, while Stewart has his self-excusing moments, his book feels like it's the work of someone who has thought about things - particularly the impact of his actions on others. With Johnson, the rest of the world are mere walk-on characters in his drama 8/
Finally: does Johnson want and hope for a comeback? You bet he does. The penultimate chapter is basically a future policy manifesto, while every other chapter is an explanation of why he was right but was unfairly maligned. end/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’m at a Tory fringe event about how to see off Reform, and already we’re hearing that the solution is - yes, for them to be more right wing on issues like migration, crime, tax, culture wars. The event hasn’t actually been organised by the Lib Dem’s, but it might as well be.
It’s worth stressing that this event is a particular strand of Tory thought - it’s organised by the Truss-friendly PopCons - but the wider, “If we’re properly right wing we’ll win again” idea is all over the Tory conference.
Another big conference theme, also echoed at this event, is the implicit idea that Labour are doing so badly in government that the Tories basically just need to get their act together and they’ll win in 2029. Who knows, it *could* happen. But it’s not an actual strategy.
At the end of day one of the Reform UK conference, what have we learned? There’s a *lot* of enthusiasm: 4,000 attendees, a claimed membership of 80,000, hundreds of new branches, a big push in May’s local elections. But can they make Farage PM, as repeatedly said? Well…. 1/
While you can never discount Farage, it’s questionable how mass market some of their flagship policies - huge tax cuts, scrap net zero, almost zero migration - really are. But then also with populist parties, it’s as much the vibe as the specifics. 2/
Speaking of those vibes…. it’s not a very comfortable feeling to have a series of speakers endlessly condemn diversity and inclusion to an overwhelmingly white audience. Farage was at pains to say “bigots” were not welcome, but the tone often said otherwise.
Scene for today’s Popular Conservatism post-election gathering in Westminster. We can all make the jokes about “popular”, but it’s 20 mins before it starts, and a fairly decent crowd for a weekday work-time event.
Where the “popular” element does have more sting is electorally: every one of the Pop Cons’ MPs, including Liz Truss, lost their seats last week. We are hearing from one MP, Suella Braverman (via video link from the US), but she was not previously part of the group.
Other than that it’s ex-MPs (Jacob Rees-Mogg), peers (David Frost, Daniel Hannan) and various think tankers. No sign of Truss unless it’s a surprise appearance.
There is some big non-election news happening today: Simon Case is finally giving evidence to the Covid inquiry, from 10am. As a reminder, we already know (from WhatsApps) that the cabinet secretary viewed Boris Johnson’s No 10 as “poisonous” and “mad”.
Because he has a PhD, Case is being referred to by Hugo Keith KC as "Dr Case", which makes him sound a bit like the keyboard player in a minor 80s band, or a third-tier rapper.
The DfT has put out a press release on clamping down on LTNs and various other scourges like 20mph limits - and it’s interesting in what is says about where we are with transport policy and the culture around it. Thread. 1/
Away from the “anti-driver” headlines, the content about more consultation on LTNs isn’t hugely controversial. That said, when I asked the DfT if they could cite one of the “recent examples where councils have implemented these schemes without public support” they couldn’t. 2/
But it is worth noting that the only new sticks the DfT offer to stop councils building new LTNs - taking control of roads and/or removing DVLA access - are legally very complex and thus highly unlikely to happen. 3/