On today’s podcast “After the Storm: A reflection on life during COVID-19”, we cover the effects on the brain based on the following article and the attached studies.
SARS-COV-2 and the Brain
There is growing evidence that SARS-CoV-2 infection may contribute to the development or exacerbation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other forms of dementia. Several studies suggest that COVID-19 can cause physical changes in the brain that resemble those seen in AD, and that amyloid plaques may play a key role in this process.
SARS-CoV-2 Amyloid Properties and Interaction with Amyloid-β (Aβ)
The SARS-CoV-2 virus itself contains several proteins that can form amyloid structures[1]. These viral amyloids may directly contribute to COVID-19-related dementia, or they could trigger the deposition of other amyloids like amyloid-β (Aβ), which is a hallmark of AD[1].
In particular, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein can bind to and promote the transmission of Aβ between cells[4]. The spike protein also activates Aβ expression and is neurotoxic itself[1]. This interaction between the spike protein and Aβ could potentially lead to the formation of toxic fibrils that contribute to AD-like pathology[1].
Additionally, the amyloid precursor protein (APP), which is cleaved to form Aβ, may facilitate the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into host cells[4]. Increased APP expression has been observed in COVID-19 patients[4], further implicating this protein in the link between the virus and AD.
Brain Changes and Cognitive Decline After COVID-19
Brain imaging studies have revealed structural changes in the brains of COVID-19 patients that are associated with cognitive impairment. These changes include atrophy of the hippocampus, gray matter, and enlargement of the ventricles[2][6]. The affected brain regions are part of dense memory and cognitive networks, possibly explaining the deficits in working memory and executive function observed in some COVID-19 survivors[2].
A study comparing brain scans before and after SARS-CoV-2 infection found greater reduction in gray matter thickness and tissue contrast in the orbitofrontal cortex and parahippocampal gyrus, as well as markers of tissue damage in regions connected to the olfactory cortex[6]. The infected participants also showed greater cognitive decline between the two timepoints[6].
Potential Mechanisms Linking COVID-19 and Alzheimer's Disease
Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how SARS-CoV-2 infection may increase the risk of AD:
1. Direct viral invasion of the central nervous system, damaging brain tissue and neurons[2][3][7] 2. Systemic and neuroinflammation, leading to blood-brain barrier disruption and cellular senescence[3][7] 3. Vascular endothelial injury[3] 4. Abnormal APP metabolism and Aβ accumulation[1][3][4][7] 5. Tau hyperphosphorylation and neurofibrillary tangle formation[4]
The ability of SARS-CoV-2 to infect the brain, combined with its amyloidogenic properties and effects on APP processing, creates a concerning link between COVID-19 and increased AD risk. While more research is needed to fully understand this connection, the current evidence highlights the potential long-term neurological consequences of the pandemic.
Protecting the brain from Covid-19 brain damage
The main and only way at this point is to not get SARS-COV-2. It’s particularly important to wear a respirator mask, n95 or better. Avoid high risk environments, such as crowded indoor spaces. If you have the option to install air purification, do so, and open windows when you can. If you can tolerate vaccines, keep yourself regularly updated with your vaccines. For those of you concerned about mNRA vaccines, there are now traditional vaccines, particularly NovaVax.
Is their evidence for viral persistence in COVID-19?
From the meticulous work of the PolyBio Research Foundation, in collaboration with the esteemed halls of UC San Francisco and Harvard Medical School, to the robust findings published in Nature and The Lancet, we are presented with compelling evidence of the virus’s tenacity.
These studies not only confirm the presence of viral proteins and RNA months after the acute phase of infection but also suggest a troubling link to the chronic, debilitating symptoms known as long COVID.
Let’s delve into some of the evidence for the evidence pointing to viral persistence of SARS-CoV-2,
1. PolyBio Research Foundation Study
A study published by the PolyBio Research Foundation, supported by UC San Francisco and Harvard Medical School, found that viral proteins from SARS-CoV-2 could persist in the body for up to 14 months post-infection. This study used an ultra-sensitive blood test to detect viral proteins in 25% of the 171 participants, indicating that the virus can linger in tissues and organs long after recovery from the acute phase of the infection. The likelihood of detecting these proteins was higher among those who were hospitalized or reported severe symptoms during their initial infection[1].
2. Nature Study on Persistent SARS-CoV-2 RNA Shedding
A cohort study published in *Nature* identified persistent SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding in individuals for at least 30 days, with some cases extending to 60 days. The study found that individuals with persistent infections had more than 50% higher odds of reporting long COVID symptoms compared to those with non-persistent infections. This suggests that persistent infections could contribute to the pathophysiology of long COVID, although the exact mechanisms remain to be fully understood[3].
3. NCBI Study on Long COVID and Viral Persistence
Research published on NCBI proposed a hypothesis-driven model for long COVID, suggesting that the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 or its components (such as the spike protein) could lead to chronic inflammation and a dysregulated immune response. This model is supported by evidence of viral RNA and antigens being detected in various tissues, including the cerebrospinal fluid and feces, months after the initial infection. The study highlights the potential for viral persistence to trigger long-term health issues[2].
4. Lancet Study on Viral Persistence in Tissues
A study published in *The Lancet* examined the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in various tissues, including blood, gastrointestinal, and surgical samples. The research found that viral RNA and proteins could be detected in these tissues long after the acute phase of infection, suggesting that the virus can persist in different parts of the body and potentially contribute to ongoing symptoms and health complications[5].
5. NCBI Study on Viral Persistence and Reactivation
Another study on NCBI explored the persistence of viral RNA and antigens in patients with long COVID. It found that viral components could be detected in blood, stool, and urine, and that the presence of these components was associated with persistent symptoms. The study also noted that viral persistence might involve either active replication or the presence of non-replicating viral RNA, which could still trigger immune responses and inflammation[4].
The evidence from these studies collectively supports the notion that SARS-CoV-2 can persist in the body for extended periods, potentially leading to long-term health issues such as long COVID. This persistence can involve both active viral replication and the presence of viral components that continue to stimulate the immune system, leading to chronic inflammation and other symptoms.
Further research should be done to put to rest this question of viral persistence and to develop effective treatments for long-term COVID.
A study reveals that SARS-CoV-2 can infect human CD4+ T helper cells, impacting the immune response in severe COVID-19 cases. The virus uses the CD4 molecule to enter these cells, leading to functional impairment and cell death. This infection results in increased IL-10 production in T cells, associated with viral persistence and severe disease. The findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection of CD4+ T cells contributes to immune dysfunction in COVID-19.