Mark Jacob Profile picture
Oct 10 15 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Dear New York Times,
Your headlines are a disaster. Such as this one in which you depict Trump’s racism as “his long-held fascination with genes and genetics.” This 🧵 offers other examples.
Please do better. I’m willing to help.
Mark
1/14 Image
When Trump called his opponents “vermin,” the Times wrote this mind-blowingly bad headline.
After a social media uproar, the Times changed it … 2/14 Image
… but in the retooled headline, the New York Times still didn’t include the key word “vermin” that Trump had used in his speech. Other media put “vermin” in the headline because of its obvious echo of fascist rhetoric of the past. 3/14 Image
When Biden visited Florida last year to inspect hurricane damage, Gov. Ron DeSantis wouldn’t meet with him. The New York Times’ first headline seemed to blame Biden. After a social media uproar, the Times rewrote it twice – but still didn’t put the onus on DeSantis. 4/14 Image
When the New York Times published an excellent editorial about Republicans blocking funds to fight AIDS worldwide, it wrote a headline blaming “partisan politics.” But it was partisan politics BY REPUBLICANS, as the editorial clearly stated. 5/14 Image
When Alabama Republicans blatantly defied a Supreme Court ruling striking down their anti-Black gerrymandering, the New York Times softened it by saying they “declined” to create a majority-Black district. 6/14 Image
When the New York Times published an important story about Republicans’ love affair with Vladimir Putin, it wrote this mushy headline, as if the editors didn’t want a hard-hitting story to have a hard-hitting impact. 7/14 Image
Last year when the New York Times was slow to accept that the economy was healthy, it put a negative spin on positive news. (As if stock investors aren’t always jittery.) 8/14 Image
And again last year, the New York Times wrote a negative headline about positive economic news. (As if fears don’t always linger in the economy.) 9/14 Image
And again last year, the New York Times wrote a negative headline about positive economic news. (As if there aren’t always wild cards in the economy.) 10/14 Image
When former Italian leader Silvio Berlusconi died, the New York Times’ headline and supporting text forgot to say he was spectacularly corrupt and was a convicted criminal. It did say he was a “showman” who “introduced sex and glamour to Italian TV.” 11/14 Image
Bad headlines aren’t a new problem for the New York Times. In 2016, the Times wrote this headline that shared a Trump lie with no skepticism.
The story itself (by NYT star Maggie Haberman) didn’t include the Cruz denial until the 7th paragraph. 12/14 archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.co…Image
And maybe this is the topper. The New York Times found a new, playful way to describe lying. 13/14 Image
I used to write newspaper headlines for a living, and I know it’s difficult to do well. I’m willing to help. @nytimes, I will give you a free seminar on how to improve your headline writing. I’m not kidding. Take me up on it. And do better. 14/14
I examine politics and media in my free Stop the Presses newsletter. Read and subscribe for free. Stopthepresses.news

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Jacob

Mark Jacob Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarkJacob16

Sep 30
As fascism assaults us, the New York Times stays in its safe space of normalization and trivialization, firm in the hope that if a dictatorship descends, it will still be allowed to publish its recipes and crosswords.
My Stop the Presses newsletter. 🧵1/4
stopthepresses.news/p/the-new-york…
The New York Times endorsed Kamala Harris today. Good. But it did so in a backhanded manner by suggesting her main asset is that she’s not Trump. And editorials aren’t enough. The Times’ news stories need to consistently take Trump's threat seriously. 2/4 nytimes.com/2024/09/30/opi…
During Trump’s civil fraud trial last November, the New York Times wrote a Page 1 story about the Trump family’s fashion choices in court. Really. Eleven months earlier, the Times put Trump’s call for “termination” of the Constitution on Page 13. 3/4
nytimes.com/2023/11/09/sty…
Read 4 tweets
Sep 28
When Trump says immigrants are “animals” who will invade your kitchen and slit your throat, Bloomberg sane-washes him by saying he “sharpened his criticism.”
This is a stain on journalism. It’s utter malpractice that endangers our country. Image
Trump is talking like Hitler and the news media act as if he’s talking like Eisenhower.
Both the New York Times and Washington Post focused their Trump speech stories on his labeling of Kamala Harris as “mentally disabled.” That indeed was reprehensible, but I think his hate speech toward immigrants was worse. Maybe the Harris insult had more horse-race interest.
Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 27
It is astounding that a major news outlet like the New York Times is failing so spectacularly at this crucial moment for the country. This thread offers a few reasons why this headline sucks. 🧵1/5 Image
Why is Trump’s name in this headline? Is he the lead actor and everyone else is in the supporting cast? Does the New York Times think this is a sequel to “The Apprentice”? 2/5
Instead of trying to “project toughness,” Harris is trying to highlight her position on an important issue in an election. Why does NYT (especially in its headlines) focus on political marketing instead of the issues? 3/5
Read 6 tweets
Sep 14
Think about any pre-Trump presidential election in your lifetime. If a major candidate had elevated a racist lie that terrorized a minority group and inspired bomb threats against schools, wouldn’t it have dominated the news? 1/4 🧵
And if the major candidate kept repeating this racist lie day after day despite solid fact-checking and pleas from local officials, wouldn’t the media uproar get much louder instead of the media losing interest and tossing the story in the “Trump being Trump” bin? 2/4 🧵
Because Trump does so many outrageous things, no single outrageous thing breaks through with appropriate force. This is the fault of the American news media. Trump has trained the media to under-react – and therefore fail to do their duty. 3/4 🧵
Read 5 tweets
Sep 9
I’ve compiled the 20 most humiliating right-wing excuses for Trump. Republican politicians and pundits embarrass themselves with ridiculous defenses of the convicted felon to earn more points with him.
This week’s Stop the Presses newsletter. 🧵1/5 stopthepresses.news/p/the-20-most-…
One of the worst Trump excusers is JD Vance. After Trump shared a meme associating Kamala Harris with blowjobs, Vance praised him for being “willing to tell some jokes. I do think that’s how you lift people up.”
Sure, JD, that’s lifting people up. 🧵2/5
Paul Ryan stars in my list of Republicans who debase themselves with absurd excuses for Trump. Ryan said Trump tried to kill an FBI probe because he's “new at this.” When Trump hinted that “2nd Amendment people” would get Hillary Clinton, Ryan called it “a joke gone bad.” 🧵3/5
Read 5 tweets
Aug 30
Major media keep pretending Trump isn’t a deranged fascist. This 🧵notes that in the last week, Trump:
* Violated the law to do a photo op at Arlington National Cemetery.
* Claimed 70% of Americans live in poverty.
* Said “Minneapolis is burned down, they never built it back.”
(🧵Trump deranged)
* Said people are eating less bacon because of windmills.
* Shared a social media post about his opponent and blowjobs.
* Said illegal immigrants take 107% of new jobs. (Yes, 107%.)
* Vowed to fire generals who disagree with him politically. (Like Stalin did.)
(🧵Trump deranged)
* Said “in 6 states you’re allowed to kill the baby after the baby is born.” (Uh, no.)
* Welcomed an endorsement from a guy who dumped a dead bear cub in Central Park. He also vowed to take public health advice from that guy, an anti-vaxxer.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(