Does anyone find it bizarre that in the Trump fraud case which was just heard in appeals court, the democrat lawyers were begging not to be sanctioned in their closing arguments???
Most people would consider this election interference through lawfare the democrats basically bankrolled with OUR tax dollars to keep Trump from running for President
On September 26, 2024, a New York appeals court heard arguments in Donald Trump's appeal of a $454 million civil fraud judgment.
The five-judge panel grilled both sides, raising concerns about the size of the penalty and the attorney general's authority to bring the case in the first place.
Judges questioned whether there were actual victims and if the state law was being used appropriately. Trump's lawyers argued for dismissal, while state attorneys defended the judgment.
the court appeared to consider sanctions against Attorney General Letitia James and her team, with her attorneys reportedly pleading against such action. No immediate decision was made, and the ruling is not expected before the upcoming election.
A consensus is emerging among legal experts that Attorney General Letitia James appears to be on this losing side of the appeals court proceedings.
The five-judge panel grilled both sides, raising concerns about the size of the penalty and the attorney general's authority to bring the case in the first place.
Judges questioned whether there were actual victims and if the state law was being used appropriately. Trump's lawyers argued for dismissal, while state attorneys defended the judgment.
the court appeared to consider sanctions against Attorney General Letitia James and her team, with her attorneys reportedly pleading against such action. No immediate decision was made, and the ruling is not expected before the upcoming election.
A consensus is emerging among legal experts that Attorney General Letitia James appears to be on this losing side of the appeals court proceedings.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
