On this day in 1971, Simone Langenhoff, aged 6, was killed while cycling to school; hit by a speeding driver.
Her death and the movement started by her father, Vic Langenhoff, a newspaper journalist, changed an entire country and saved thousands of Dutch lives. Here's how 🧵
He joined other grieving parents to campaign for change. Vic Langenhoff wrote this in his newspaper in September 1972: “A few people have stood up who want to break through the apathy with which Dutch people accept the daily slaughter of children in traffic.”
He published a manifesto for change: “I am not advocating for 22-lane highways, but for safe cycle paths.”
He also highlighted the need for tougher driving penalties and reminded readers that driving is not a fundamental human right.
His manifesto called for a pressure group: Stop de Kindermoord (“Stop the Child Murder”).
The number of traffic casualties in the Netherlands rose to a peak of 3,300 deaths in 1971.
More than 400 children were killed in traffic collisions that year; Simone Langenhoff one of them. Each death meant families and communities torn apart.
Vic Langenhoff’s article struck a chord which led to the formation of Stop de Kindermoord. First led by Maartje van Putten, a former MEP, she told The Guardian: “The streets no longer belonged to the people who lived there, but to huge traffic flows. That made me very angry.”
You can watch a brilliant piece and interview with Maartje van Putten from @annaholligan here:
Politics was more accessible in the 1970s. The group held demonstrations, created play streets and visited politicians. They met MPs and cycled to the house of the Prime Minister, Joop den Uyl, asking for streets to be safer for children. The PM came out to hear their plea.
Protests were continued and vocal. Politicians were deeply worried about road deaths on their streets.
The Dutch government supported the group and eventually they started to produce ideas for safer streets and more inclusive urbanism.
Progress started to happen, aided by the 1973 OAPEC Oil Embargo, which encouraged the Dutch back onto their bikes.
The Government started "Car Free Sundays".
The protests and world events led to the development of the first dedicated cycle routes in the late 1970s.
The Dutch experimented with cycle routes, speed bumps, home zones, and car-free city centres - these paved the way for the Netherlands’ current integrated network of cycle paths.
Not all of it worked.
When I visited Dutch officials in Delft, they told me how they built big protected cycle paths but people didn’t use them, because they didn’t have the network joining them all up.
It's a mistake often made in other countries, including the UK.
Most countries did not have the foresight to build cycle paths and safe streets in the 70s. The best time to start would have been then - but the second best time to start is now.
And the good news? The Dutch have experimented and shown what works to make streets safer.
53 years later, cars are safer, collisions are fewer. But so are the number of people walking and cycling. More children get driven in cars to keep them safe from other cars.
But we’re kidding ourselves if we think things are OK.
As the data shows.
5,336 children aged 0-15 are killed or seriously injured (often life-changing issues) on our roads each year in England alone.
That’s over 14 children killed or seriously injured per day in England.
Some people reading this will think “But we’re not Amsterdam.”
But Amsterdam back then wasn’t like the Amsterdam we know now either.
We have the knowledge and tools to make our streets significantly better and safer for children. For all.
In most cases, more people feeling safe will even make things better for drivers - reducing congestion from short trips that would be better taken by other modes.
Simone Langenhoff never got to see the better future created in her name. Her father Vic would have rather avoided the anguish following his daughter’s death.
But thousands of families have been saved from the same loss and grief as a result of the campaigning that followed.
It’s never too late to take our streets back for children.
We know what to do. We know what it takes: political will and funding.
The new Labour government has even said "Taking back our streets" will be one of their 5 missions.
When we build bigger roads, we get more traffic. Congestion briefly gets better, then the same, then worse. £Billions is spent in the process.
Instead of dualling roads, what if we used the space for active travel instead? Here’s a thread on why it should happen.🧵
These pictures, taken by @carltonreid, show the A27 rural active travel path, adjacent to the main road. Rather than build a bigger carriageway, National Highways instead built one of the best rural active travel paths in the country, as featured in @laura_laker’s book.
I have long thought that National Highways, with the right political direction, could transform active travel in this country. They are an organisation with the resource, experience and powers to deliver at scale.
With councils often stretched, this could be hugely impactful.
This Platinum Jubilee weekend, 1000s of residential roads will be closed. Kids will play out safely. People will get to know their neighbours.
Then come Monday, those streets will revert to carrying overspill traffic from the main road network. But what if we changed that? 1/n
It’s very usual for people living in quiet Dutch streets, filtered from motor traffic, to set up a table outside the front and have dinner with neighbours.
In the space once taken up by cars, they’ll now find playgrounds and public squares.
While having a bouncy castle in the middle of the street is probably best to be a temporary measure, it’s quite common for residential streets in the Netherlands to have playgrounds and community gardens.
Here’s US Postmen, British suffragette Lady Florence Norman and a US couple using foldable Autopeds in the 1910s.
They were very popular for a while until street speeds became too hostile for their use, and motor cars took over.
Some things never change, huh? There was outrage in newspapers. “Solo devil wagon taken up in a serious way might add new terrors to city life,” read one subheading.
The vehicles also became a symbol of women’s empowerment.
“There was kind of a sweet period there, a little over 100 years ago, when it looked like streets could be for everybody, but the people who wanted them to be for cars got the speed limits increased to the point where if you weren’t in a car, it was a scary place to be.”
THREAD: Ealing council has released the results of its consultation, a sort of hyper-local referendum, on Low Traffic Neighbourhoods.
Whether you support them or not, I think we can all agree this process is the blueprint for how NOT to make decisions on transport policy.
Firstly, here are the results. 22,000 people responded out of a population of 340,000 Borough population - this self-selecting sample is just 6.47% and is the most vocal and engaged.
The climate emergency, road danger, long-term air pollution, of course, affect everybody.
From the results, the Council took the resident's opinion as the basis of whether LTNs should be implemented, or - after a short period of deferral (more on that later) - removed.
This is a very small number of people who live in the direct vicinity. Sometimes just a few dozen.
THREAD (1/10) The Telegraph report that London Ambulance staff logged 159 occasions in 8 months where LTNs delayed them. This isn’t ideal but let’s put it in the context of other 999 delays.
Widely normalised traffic congestion held up London Fire Brigade *8,841* times in 2017.
It was lower in 2020 because of the pandemic but still 5,542 instances because of traffic or roadworks. Plus, over 2,000 each year because they had the wrong address.
When was the last time you saw a headline on “Increased Car Usage and Associated Congestion Cause 999 Delays”?
It really comes down to boiling frog syndrome. We’ve accepted without realising that in the last 10 years the number of miles driven on London’s roads each year increased by a 3.9 billion. But when it comes to fast and bold action to tackle this - it shocks and worries us.
THREAD: Today, between 1200-2500 people marched against #LTNs in Ealing. In doing so, they inadvertently demonstrated why they are essential.
In London, 36% of car journeys could be walked in under 25 mins. Human-powered transport is very space-efficient.
If the same amount of people had used cars at the London average occupancy rate (1.3), it would have looked something like this (pics represent approx. 923 or 1,923 cars). With 1m in between each car, this number would stretch nearly 7km or 14km of road - some traffic jam!
Of course, none of this will change if these vehicles become electric. They will still take up the same amount of space. In fact, the trend for vehicles is that they are becoming bigger. We cannot be fatalistic and assume anything to stop car usage will cause congestion.