This is Yair Oriel, former director of digital at Israeli TV Channel 14.
(Always bear in mind these are responses to someone sharing footage of Palestinian children being burned alive by an Israeli missile)
This is Dr. Rafi Kishon.
According to his bio, he is a 'multidisciplinary lecturer.'
He lists his interests as including "animals and smiles".
This is Lilach Leibovic. She claims to be addressed as "Her Highness".
Here's Ezra Yousef, a VP in Business Development. Here's an Israeli who now lives in San Francisco.
Their bio is "superhero".
Her bio is "full time mom".
Their bio is "absolute victory".
Her bio is "Mother and wife, secular and a proud Jew from the center of the country, loves Israel. I know that Kahane was not wrong."
According to their profile, they're a psychologist.
They claim to live somewhere in the "Holy Land".
This man claims to be "social-democratic left".
"Because as long as Hamas remains the ruler of Gaza, there is a moral obligation to continue the war, even at the cost of dead Palestinian children. This is clear and obvious to everyone."
You get the gist.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gaza genocide deniers like @DavidHirsh should explain, clearly and plainly:
Why have pre-eminent scholars - including in Israel - who dedicate their lives to studying genocide and indeed the Holocaust independently concluded that Israel has committed genocide?
How could academics specialising in the study of genocide get such an unbelievably extreme conclusion so wrong?
If indeed all these genocide scholars have somehow got this wrong, would they not have arrived at this conclusion on the basis of unbelievably damning evidence?
Political journalism isn’t about allowing voters to make informed decisions, thus enhancing democracy.
It’s about setting and policing the parameters of political debate - determining everything from what’s considered extreme, to what’s considered scandalous.
In practise, most British political journalism reduces politics to a character driven Westminster soap opera, based on who is up or down.
But this is itself highly ideological, because it’s based on embedding what’s seen as “serious” and politically acceptable.