matthew remski Profile picture
Oct 15 7 tweets 2 min read Read on X
🧵Trump surrendering tonight's Q&A to 30 minutes of his fave songs while standing on stage, awkwardly conducting at times, echoes MANY instances of cultic leaders who, exhausted, ill, and at the end of their cognitive rope, outsource their emotional dominance subroutines... /1
...to canned music they personally find exquisitely sentimental. As traumatized narcissists, they are seeking comfort and avoiding work, but also assume that their core memories of pleasure will make their power and soul transparent and accessible to their followers. /2
Yes it's weird. No the campaign gives no explanation, because the logic is a sealed system. Believers lose themselves in the choruses. Handlers know there's nothing they can do but keep him propped up. Kristi Noem knows her inner circle status depends on staying bright-eyed. /3
The leader of the group I was in for 3 years maintained a Trump-campaign-like schedule of daily 2-hour sermons. Over the years he increasingly relied on his DJ to fill the room with emotional overwhelm whenever he gapped out. He was 78 too. He air-conducted the tunes. /4
He had a shrinking repertoire of melted talking points. But because there was never any substance to his schtick, he didn't struggle to remember details that were slipping away. He just turned to the music. All he had ever done was generated a mood. Then he died of a stroke. /5
Maybe helpful to keep in mind: for Trump followers the default to pure emotionality can be effective right up until the end. For some the intensity of their bond might increase, because for them as for him, the affect was the point. They weren't there for the platform. /6
There are people in the crowd who are uncomfortable, or who can recognize the signs, or who get bored and leave early. But for those really caught up, that 30 minutes of music and reverie might feel like the most direct and intimate contact they've ever had with him. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with matthew remski

matthew remski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @matthewremski

Oct 15
Hello well this caught fire and I’m glad it was helpful. A few questions came up as well as some cab-ride thoughts so I’ll thread them here. /1

First, for “traumatized narcissism”, please see my interview with the coiner of the term, psychoanalyst and cult recovery therapist Dan Shaw:


/2conspirituality.net/episodes/brief…
Many have scrolled the great rally clip collections of @atrupar and wondered how attendees stand the dementia. Some can’t, but those who can have digested the non sequiturs and catatonic flashes as signs of mystical awareness that enhance their own trance state. /3
Read 19 tweets
May 24
🧵 After reading Eve Sedgwick I’m trying to lift myself up out of the paranoid reading stance that dominates debunking and anti-cult work, because I also want to look for possibilities and repair, and where people are healing. /1
Experiences and relationships within a high-demand group can be toxic, authoritarian, and exploitative. But some members experience love and connection that they’ve never known before. That is what makes it so hard for them to reckon with abuse, leave, or whistleblow. /2
If I really let myself see beyond the bottom-line conclusion that I came to in relation to the groups I was in—they were exploitative, disorganized, they stole my time and agency in the world, they made me complicit with injuries against others (all true)—I can remember…/3
Read 9 tweets
Mar 9
🧵 Great that we’re all studying #KatieBritt ‘s uncanny SOTU performance. Takes from @angela_denker and @piper4missouri on the aesthetics and fundie baby voice of Evangelical women’s submission are crucial.

And… it's an opportunity for progressives to look in the mirror. /1
What Denker and Piper describe so well is evangelical women’s entrained affect, an embodied primal signalling of deference and obedience. It’s palpable before Britt says a word, and then the ASMR tremulo seals the deal so hard even the MAGA world cringes at the inauthenticity. /2
Our side of the aisle goes nuts. We’re totally vindicated at how full of shit these people are, how much they’re willing to debase themselves by faking empathy and earnestness to cover over the lies of cruelty, wealth inequality, and contempt for difference. She’s so busted. /3
Read 11 tweets
Mar 7
The most popular framework for looking at the cult leader is evil/pathologizing: He’s a malignant narcissist. He’s a sociopath. It’s black and white and moralizing.

These are only diagnostic guesses, unnuanced and unforgiving. There may be other frameworks. /1
After 8 years of cult journalism, there’s only 2 leaders who fit the bill of "simply evil" for me. All the rest, including the leaders of the groups I was in, showed signs of neurodiversity or mental stress that they somehow positively mobilized through the charisma economy. /2
So this is not an ableist analysis. I’m suggesting that in the absence of social inclusion and good care, some isolated / marginalized yet charismatic people may in time organize their circles of support in ways that have anti-social effects. Or at least that’s how it starts. /3
Read 12 tweets
Mar 3
I'll be more specific. I have many reasons to loathe #RFKJr’s bullshit, but the ones that hit closest to home are his pathologization of autistic people and his disgusting claim that SSRIs (not guns) are a causal factor in mass shootings in American schools. /1
Of course these two melted claims blend together. He believes vaccines are a causal factor in autism, and that autistic people have no light in their eyes and cannot express love and affection (he literally says this). /2
And then he suggests that the medications that many rely on to stabilize themselves in the ableist and cruel world—which he fortifies every day—drive them to mass murder. /3
Read 5 tweets
Jan 31
I get a feeling when I hear phrases like “critical thinking,” or admonishments to “follow the science.” Obviously we should do these things. But the discourse often values individualistic effort over issues of access, education, and most of all, social trust. /1
For most folks there are sharp limitations on grasping complex issues in health care or ecology. These are zones beyond lay capacity. We have to rely on institutions and traditions and the general feeling of care in how we govern ourselves. Nobody thinks alone. /2
Also: advising “critical thinking” in a way that focuses on individual empowerment is very easily mimicked by two discourses: 1) marketing, in which consumers are flattered and goaded into making smart purchase choices. And 2) the discourse of conspiracism or heterodox affect. /3
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(