How many times did we get an offer to split the land with the Jews?
1. Peel Commission (1937): This was the first major proposal for partition by the British, recommending a division of Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states. The plan proposed a small Jewish state in>
parts of the north and coastal areas, with the remainder of the land going to the Arabs. The Jewish leadership accepted it in principle but wanted modifications, while the Arabs outright rejected it.
2. United Nations Partition Plan (1947): Known as UN Resolution 181, this>
was the most significant partition plan prior to the establishment of the State of Israel. The plan proposed the creation of independent Jewish and Arab states, with Jerusalem as an international city. The Jewish community accepted the plan, but the Arab leadership rejected it,>
leading to the 1947–1948 Civil War and the subsequent Arab-Israeli War of 1948.
3. Armistice Agreements (1949): After the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, armistice agreements were signed between Israel and its neighboring Arab states, but these did not constitute a formal partition plan>
Instead, they established ceasefire lines, known as the Green Line, without official recognition of borders.
4. Rogers Plan (1969):
Proposed by U.S. Secretary of State William P. Rogers, the Rogers Plan aimed at resolving the Israeli-Arab conflict after the 1967 Six-Day War.>
The plan called for Israeli withdrawal from territories occupied in the war (including the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem) in exchange for peace and recognition by Arab states.
Impact: The plan was rejected by both Israel and the Arab states, as Israel was unwilling to>
the pre-1967 borders, and the Arab states refused to recognize Israel or negotiate at that time.
5. Camp David Accords (1978):
The Camp David Accords were brokered by U.S. President Jimmy Carter between Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin.>
Two frameworks were agreed upon:
A. Framework for Peace in the Middle East B. Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty (1979) Impact: The accords improved relations between Israel and Egypt but did not resolve the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict, nor did they lead to immediate Palestinian>
autonomy.
6. Madrid Conference (1991):
After the Gulf War, the U.S. and the Soviet Union co-sponsored the Madrid Peace Conference, bringing Israel and Arab states (including Palestinian representatives) to the negotiating table for the first time.
Impact: The conference>
initiated direct, face-to-face negotiations but did not result in a final agreement. However, it paved the way for later agreements, including the Oslo Accords.
7. Oslo Accords (1993-1995):
The Oslo Accords were the first direct agreement between Israel and the Palestine>
Liberation Organization (PLO). The accords outlined a framework for Palestinian self-governance in parts of the West Bank and Gaza and a five-year timeline for further negotiations on issues like borders, refugees, and Jerusalem. Impact: The Oslo Accords led to the establishment>
of the Palestinian Authority and the division of the West Bank into Areas A, B, and C, each with varying levels of Palestinian and Israeli control. However, final status issues were left unresolved, and subsequent violence, including the Second Intifada (2000-2005), disrupted>
the peace process.
8. Camp David Summit (2000):
U.S. President Bill Clinton hosted Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat at Camp David to negotiate a final status agreement. Barak offered a two-state solution, proposing that Israel would>
withdraw from most of the West Bank and Gaza, while retaining some settlement blocs and offering a shared Jerusalem. Arafat rejected the offer.
Impact: The failure of the summit, combined with the outbreak of the Second Intifada, led to a collapse in the peace process.>
9. Taba Summit (2001):
Following the Camp David failure, Israeli and Palestinian negotiators met in Taba, Egypt, to try to salvage the peace process. The talks made significant progress, with Israel offering a near-complete withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza and compromises>
on Jerusalem. However, the negotiations were interrupted by Israeli elections and the Second Intifada.
Impact: While progress was made, the talks ended without a final agreement, and violence escalated soon after.>
10. Annapolis Conference (2007):
The Annapolis Conference, held in November 2007 in Annapolis, Maryland, was a peace summit aimed at resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and promoting the two-state solution. It was initiated by U.S. President George W. Bush and attended by>
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, and representatives from several other nations. The conference sought to revive peace negotiations based on previous agreements, with the goal of establishing an independent Palestinian state>
alongside Israel. During the negotiations, Olmert made a far-reaching peace proposal to Abbas, offering a near-total Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank, a territorial link to Gaza, and international control of Jerusalem's Old City. Abbas, however, rejected the offer.>
11. Trump Administration Peace Plan ("Deal of the Century") (2020):
The Trump administration proposed a peace plan in January 2020, which envisioned a two-state solution, with Israel retaining large portions of the West Bank, including settlement blocs, while offering the>
Palestinians limited autonomy over a non-contiguous state. Jerusalem would remain Israel's capital, and the Palestinians would receive some compensation for land losses.
Impact: The plan was welcomed by Israel but rejected outright by the Palestinian leadership.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Before the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, Jewish individuals and organizations purchased significant amounts of land in Ottoman Empire and Mandatory Palestine from Arab landowners. From the late 19th century up to 1948, Jewish organizations like the Jewish>
National Fund (JNF) and other private groups systematically bought land, focusing on areas that would be key for the development of Jewish settlements. Most of the land was purchased from large absentee Arab landowners (often living in Beirut, Damascus, and other cities) rather>
than local peasants, many of whom continued to live and work on the land after it was sold. Arab leaders and intellectuals were critical of the land sales to Jews, expressing concerns about the long-term consequences for the Arab population in Palestine:>
What is the biggest lie the PLO and their supporters have ever told? The lie is that the PLO is willing to compromise and make peace with Israel. How do we know this is a lie? The PLO has never deleted the clauses calling for the destruction of the State of Israel from its>
charter, as it committed to in the Oslo Accords and countless times afterward. But the "recognition of Israel" is only the lower level of the lie. This level can perhaps, with great difficulty, be imposed on the bloody reality and short public memory since Arafat signed the Oslo>
Accords (and reassured Arab listeners that he was deceiving the Jews as the prophet Muhammad did, saying "Remember Hudaybiyyah!").
It is necessary to ignore Arafat's support for terror, the financial royalties the authority still pays to those who murder Jews, the fact that>
Suicide bombings are glorified, as is cutting the necks of the enemy>
Reading comprehension is taught through a violent story promoting suicide bombings and exalting Palestinian militants in the battle of Karameh as their blades “fell on the necks of enemy soldiers” and “wore explosive belts, thus turning their bodies into fire burning the Zionist>
tank.” Israeli forces are described as “leaving behind some of the bodies and body parts, to become food for wild animals on land and birds of prey in the sky.” An accompanying illustration at the beginning of the story depicts Israeli soldiers in a tank,>
Students to be punished for not directly connecting Judaism with murder:
Antisemitic grading instructions tell teachers to deduct grading points from students who fail to “tie the perpetration of Zionist massacres to Jewish>
religious thought.” In a section titled “Mechanisms for the Application of Lessons,” teachers are required to grade students’ performance based on their comprehension of a history lesson which discusses the events of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, including the exodus of Arab>
refugees from the territory which became the State of Israel, an event known as the Nakbah. As the teacher asks students questions about the lesson, the teacher’s guide provides a chart which structures how the students should be graded based on their answers.>