Thread by @altNOAA

This is not true, there's not any scientific evidence to support a global flood. In fact, there's scientific evidence in opposition of the Bible event.

The mountains used to be underwater, the Rockies were once a seabed south of the equator. That's why there are fossils.

There's no fossil record indicating any great migration of species to the Middle East. Many Australian species have never left Australia, they evolved and stayed there. There's no water marks on Great Pyramids indicative of a flood event. The Noah Flood story is a myth. 100%.

I could do this with a good number of species, but my favorite example to disprove this myth is the Koala. The oldest known koala fossil is approximately 20 million years old and belongs to the extinct genus Nimiokoala. That predates the flood...

So for the Koala to exist, it would have to leave Australia and travel to the Middle East, likely the Sinai Peninsula. Here's where the fun math kicks in. A koala has to sleep about 20 hours per day, and only moves at a meager 0.2 mph. This is an 8,000 mile trip. See it yet?

They live about 12 years. So assuming the oceans dried up so they could walk (that's the only way they're getting to Egypt), it would take about 30 years if they put 100% of their energy to this goal. So we're talking 4 to 5 generations of Koalas here to make a 30 year trip.

And since other animals eat and hunt, many koalas would had to have left Australia in order for two to make the boat. And then, there's the whole trip back. They would have had to repopulate into the thousands to make it back and of course the oceans would have to dry up again.

All of this would leave fossil records all over Middle East and other parts of the world. But there are none. And of course, if the oceans had dried up, that kills off marine life and that certainly didn't happen. So forget polar bears and penguins, et al., koalas prove its myth!