Richard H. Ebright Profile picture
Oct 16 13 tweets 3 min read Read on X
GARDP/WHO report:

[T]he clinical pipeline for new antibacterials remains inadequate for current and future needs

[R]eturns on investment for new ‘reserve’ antibiotics do not cover research, development, registration, manufacturing, and distribution cost

cdn.who.int/media/docs/def…Image
"Antimicrobial resistance remains one of the top 10 global health threats, linked to 4.95 million deaths in 2019—surpassing those from HIV or malaria. Recent global estimates suggest that resistant bacterial infections will cause 39 million deaths by 2050." Image
Image
"It also threatens the global economy…Without strengthened action, treating resistant bacterial infections alone would exert a global economic burden of USD 412B in healthcare costs and USD 443 B in lost productivity each year up to 2035"
"[O]nly 32 new antibiotics are in clinical development, but most of them derivatives of existing classes...[O]nly 12 innovative compounds are in development, with just four targeting pathogens designated as critical by WHO"
"[T]he preclinical pipeline is dynamic and innovative, but also fragile because product developers have small teams and both products and companies are subject to high turnover"
"Markets for novel antibiotics show limited viability, as returns on investment for new 'reserve' antibiotics do not cover research, development, registration, manufacturing, and distribution costs. Major pharmaceutical companies have largely abandoned antibiotic R&D"
"Due to the unfavourable and uncertain financial situation, many scientific experts continue to leave the field across all stages of development, intensifying the fragility of the R&D pipeline"
"Current incentives for antimicrobial resistance R&D are insufficient."
"'Push' incentives - government or regulatory interventions which support R&D by directly lowering the costs of development - provide a crucial lifeline to some…R&D projects but are insufficient on their own to meet R&D goals and bring new products to market."
"Pull incentives - policies rewarding R&D programs that successfully bring products to market and ensure access - have been slow to be implemented."
"There is a need for innovative financing policies. More widespread adoption of policies rewarding successful R&D programs through pull incentives or other innovative financing mechanisms are particularly necessary."
"The G7 and the EU would gain significant economic and social benefits by investing early in an multifaceted antibiotic incentive program targeting urgent public health needs."
*GARMRDH/WHO report

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard H. Ebright

Richard H. Ebright Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @R_H_Ebright

Oct 2
"The WHO has acknowledged 'there is no viable market for novel antibiotics,' adding that 'the return on investment for new 'reserve' antibiotics does not cover the costs of development, manufacturing, and distribution.'"
Image
"Developing a new antibiotic typically takes 10 to 15 years...Even if a product makes it to market, it is rarely profitable as these drugs are meant to be reserved as a last resort."
"The market for new antimicrobials is small and far from profitable. For most drugmakers, the risk of losses is offset by the prospect of much larger profit, but antibiotics are a notable exception in this respect."
Read 4 tweets
Sep 29
"Boris Johnson: "The awful thing about the whole Covid catastrophe is that it appears to have been entirely man-made in all its aspects…It now looks overwhelmingly likely that the mutation was the result of [a] botched experiment in a Chinese lab."

inews.co.uk/opinion/boris-…
Image
"The…case…has grown steadily stronger with each crumb of evidence. There was always valid suspicion over a pandemic erupting in…city that is home to the world’s foremost research lab for Sars…viruses, especially when it was found to have known concerns over safety practices."
"This lab collected thousands of bat viruses from southern China…, but hid its database. It carried out high-risk 'gain-of-function' research to boost infectivity of coronaviruses in low-level security environments, derided as 'wild west' even by its funders in Washington."
Read 7 tweets
Sep 25
"The Wuhan Institute of Virology’s chief American collaborator leveraged connections in Anthony Fauci’s inner circle to survive federal scrutiny and keep millions in public funding flowing without turning over key data, new records show."

usrtk.org/covid-19-origi…
"Hundreds of documents—emails obtained under FOIA lawsuits or congressional subpoena, as well as congressional interview transcripts—show Fauci’s institute protected EcoHealth Alliance, which collaborated on novel coronavirus discovery and engineering projects with the Wuhan lab"
"[O]fficials at the NIH’s central headquarters or “Building One”…had suspended EcoHealth’s…grant and sought lab notebooks and unpublished genomic data as a condition of getting its funding back. This information could have shed light on the coronavirus research in Wuhan"
Read 28 tweets
Sep 19
Letter to Cell: "Crits-Christoph et al. 2024 has unsound premises, has unsound conclusions, and may be a product of scientific misconduct. We urge Cell to issue an Expression of Editorial Concern for this paper and to initiate…investigation of this paper for possible retraction" Image
Link for full text of letter to Cell:
biosafetynow.substack.com/p/crits-christ…
Read 4 tweets
Sep 14
""We may never know the full story of the pandemic's origin. But if this were a bureaucratic whodunit, the most likely suspect would be Fauci. COVID-19 was Fauci's pandemic."

reason.com/2024/09/14/fau…
"The evidence is not fully conclusive. But it seems…likely…Fauci pushed for what his peers repeatedly said was dangerous research, that some of that dangerous research produced a deadly viral pathogen that escaped the lab, and that Fauci helped cover up…its origins."
"Prior to COVID-19, Fauci had long supported funding pandemic research that other scientists found risky, if not downright dangerous."
Read 23 tweets
Sep 10
There is now no doubt that Covid leaked from a lab

spiked-online.com/2024/09/10/the…
"[W]hat happened in Wuhan, China was worse than a thousand Bhopals. It killed around 28million people – and was by far the most lethal industrial or scientific accident that has ever occurred."
"The outbreak began not just in one of the very few cities doing research on this kind of virus, but also in the city with the biggest SARS-like virus research programme on the planet"
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(