(π§΅2/5, HISTORY): What does history teach us about pandemics?
This is a topic that's been covered by others, but much of what's been said is worth taking a closer look at, in context.
Let's look at some historical pandemics/epidemics & see what we can learn. (1/)
It's worth starting by defining what a pandemic is- and isn't. To quote Michael Osterholm (in '09): β(A) pandemic is basically aβ¦novel agent emerging with worldwide transmission.β
It's an epidemiological, not a social, construct. Pandemics don't go away if you ignore them. (2/)
In the last π§΅, we looked at what biology tells us about emergent pathogens.
The key take-home: the evolution of their virulence is unpredictable- it often increases.
Host & pathogen are locked in a Red Queen's Race (3/). It's not a stable equilibrium.
Pandemics are (re)emergence events - their timelines have historically been variable- they can run for decades or centuries.
(Later in this π§΅, we'll discuss why some pandemics end in a couple of years & others last for generations.)
We'll look at 3 historic pandemics. (4/)
The 1st of these is Plague, specifically the 2nd Plague Pandemic (1347-1657), starting with the Black Death (1347-1352).
Plague, caused by the bacterium Y Pestis, has a CFR of 40-60% if untreated.
Y pestis emerged ~5000yrs ago, causing a pandemic that lasted generations. (5/)
Y Pestis evolves slowly (it's clonal). The Black Death was driven by emergence out of rodents (marmots) of a highly virulent & transmissible Y Pestis clone. Sudden evolutionary jumps like this (punctuated equilibrium) are common when a pathogen (re) emerges from a reservoir. (6/)
Detailed death records & paleogenomic sequencing allow a surprisingly detailed picture of the 2nd Plague Pandemic. We know there were repeated waves at roughly generational intervals- makes sense as plague immunity is lifelong. New waves were seeded from the reservoir(rats). (7/)
Y Pestis slowly evolved to become more transmissible over the years. The pandemic persisted until societal changes eliminated the conditions for it (living with rats/ fleas). "Learning to live with" the plague caused millions of deaths, basic hygiene got rid of the problem. (8/)
Next, let's look at Smallpox (an endemic, not a pandemic, disease). Smallpox was instrumental in the collapse of indigenous North American cultures- the smallpox epidemic in Tenochtitlan killed 40% of the population in a year, paving the way for Cortes' defeat of the Aztecs. (9/)
Why were the conquistadores spared? The CFR in Europe (15-30%) was lower than in Mexico, & smallpox mainly killed small kids. We can infer the adult CFR as 2.5%. Similarly, we can infer ~10% of Spaniards were immune. So the expected no. of conquistadore deaths in 1521? ~1 (10/)
Living with smallpox for millennia likely provided a genetic basis for resistance. In other words, despite the popular narrative that immunity to smallpox was what provided the Spaniards with an advantage, age structure & evolved resistance are more plausible explanations. (11/)
As a side point, intrinsic CFR for smallpox was bimodal. Variola major & variola minor, which coexisted for centuries, were two clades of smallpox with a ~30% & a ~1% CFR respectively.
Viral CFRs are not carved in stone, even for slowly evolving viruses such as smallpox. (12/)
Next, let's discuss the 1918 Flu pandemic. The influenza virus has a segmented genome, favoring the mix & match of antigenic determinants. Seasonal flu evolves relatively slowly in humans (undergoing "antigenic drift"), and has fairly low transmissibility & virulence. (13/)
Pandemics are caused by "antigenic shifts", when flu re-emerges from animal reservoirs. These are punctuated equilibrium events, characterized by big jumps in transmissibility &virulence relative to seasonal flu. Pandemic flu clades burn out quickly,as they run out of hosts (14/)
The clade of H1N1 responsible for the 1918 Pandemic may have been circulating in pigs at the turn of the 20th c.
A single-nucleotide change in the HA gene was sufficient to kick off the pandemic, with the virus now possessing increased virulence & transmissibility (15/)
Notably, the 1918 spring & fall waves appear to have been caused by different clades of the virus, both of which went extinct at the end of the pandemic. Several phylogenetic studies have shown that seasonal H1N1 is not descended from pandemic flu (see screenshots for more) (16/)
Much of what gets said about 1918 influenza is just wrong.
Influenza pandemics end with herd immunity, which (combined with NPIs) drives the pandemic viral clade to extinction.
1918 Flu didn't "attenuate", in fact the 2nd wave (different clade) was deadlier than the 1st. (17/)
In summary: 1. Punctuated equilibrium is a common threat. 2. Pandemics can be self-limiting (flu) or not (plague). 3. Pandemics can run for generations. 4. Even endemic disease can cause societal collapse. 5. CFRs are not carved in stone. 6. NPIs can help end pandemics. (18/)
A popular trope in recent years has been that ignoring a pandemic is the best course "for the economy". But pandemics are intrinsically violent events, and history doesn't support the idea that they benefit societies. (There are whole books written about this subject, btw). (19/)
Pandemics can destabilize governments. Not surprisingly, mass death events often catalyze riots, revolts & civil war. (The examples in the screenshot will be fleshed out later with references in our blog posts & articles. Some of these events are well known). (20/)
Pandemics can lead to military defeats, as they rarely impact both combatants equally. (And even when they do, they can tip the balance of power unpredictably by allowing one or the other side a transient military advantage, as we saw with Cortes &. Aztecs). (21/)
Complex, labor-intensive systems can fail during pandemics. Mass death & disability can cause famines, labor shortages & supply chain disruptions. Not surprisingly, GDP contractions & inflation (stagflation) have been shown to arise repeatedly during historical pandemics. (22/)
Historical pandemics have often been part of or a cause of polycrises (the intersection of infectious disease, climate change & civil war). These are repeated historical patterns,not coincidences. (Again, refs in upcoming posts/articles - these examples are well documented) (23/)
Pandemics are incredibly bad for business & social stability- they're harbingers of social collapse. We've known about these things for millennia- there's a good reason why the Bible talks about the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (plague, famine, civil unrest & conquest). (24/)
Much of the popular narratives around pandemics have been shaped by (misinterpretation of) the 1918 Flu Pandemic.
In some aspects, 1918 Flu was a best-case scenario- it was limited by herd immunity &human behavioral changes were effective.
We can't always count on that. (25/25)
Many*
H/t again, to @TRyanGregory & @madistod for stimulating conversations that gave rise to much of this material, and to @gckirchoff & @0bj3ctivity for helpful feedback.
This is actually part 3 of a series of 6 π§΅s, links to the first two parts are below β¬οΈ
(π§΅It's the Π‘ΞΏΞ½Ρd, ΡtΟ ΡΡd!): Viewing the US election through the lens of the ongoing Π ΠRΠ -Π‘ΠΎΞ½-2 ΡΠ°ndΠ΅mΡc.
(My hot take on what happened, and where things are headed. Prelude to the final π§΅in the "How does it end" series)
(1/)
The post-mortem season for the elections is in full swing, and commentators on the left & right have lots of theories about why the Dems lost.
US elections are part of a global trend- incumbent parties in developing countries have lost vote share in every election this year(2/)
A common explanation for this is cost of living. Polls worldwide show dissatisfaction with the cost of living (the gap between the cost of goods & purchasing power), which by some measures is wider than ever before.
(Note that cost of living doesnβt map 1:1 with inflation.) (3/)
(π§΅, CAN WE TALK ABOUT IT?):Over the last 5yrs, we as a society have developed a set of norms about πππππ. As someone who's been actively publishing on the subject, I notice it very strongly. People will ask "why are you still masking", then wince when they hear my reply(1/)
I find it almost amusing, because our friends & famly know I work on the subject, & they're usually the ones that bring it up first. But my reply is obviously not what they want to hear, so I often get the "that was too much" look from my wife & kids in these situations (2/)
This plays out in the public sphere as well. "Expert" opinion that's soothing or reassuring is platformed, even if it's repeatedly wrong. This is a form of propaganda ("Calm-mongering" @Tryangregory ), & distracts us from the reality : (3/) typingmonkeys.substack.com/p/calm-mongeriβ¦
(π§΅NO ONE COULD HAVE PREDICTED THIS): To answer the question "What does the future hold for πππ π-πππ-π?" it's worth examining how predictable its evolutionary trajectory has been so far. Evolution is stochastic, but stochastic processes can still yield predictions. (1/)
Paradoxically, while evolution is highly unpredictable at a molecular level, predicting its consequences and anticipating its risks is actually quite easy. We'll dive a lot deeper into this idea in a later TT, as it's a crucial one for understanding our current situation. (2/)
While "expert" prognostications from the early pandemic were wildly off-base, it was possible to reason deductively. We (my collaborators & I, h/t in particular @madistod & @debravanegeren) called out many of the risks within the first year, in the peer-reviewed literature. (3/)
(π§΅1/5, EMERGENCE): What happens to virulence after a new pathogen emerges? Popular thinking on the subject is that pathogens evolve become less virulent over time when they co-exist with their host species, based on the logic that virulent pathogens don't spread effectively.(1/)
This perception is occasionally echoed by experts as well, for example in this Science article: βπππ π-πππ-π is going to become a common cold. At least thatβs what we want.β (If wishes were horses, then zoonotic spillover would be nothing to worry about, I guess?) (2/)
The idea dates back to the "Law of Declining Virulence", propounded by medical doctor Theobald Smith in the 19thC (far from the last MD to confidently hold forth on the topic of evolution). Unfortunately, it's not supported by experimental data (see screenshots for example). (3/)
It's been ~5yrs since πππ π-πππ-π, the virus that causes πππππ, made its fateful jump into humans. Now seems as good a time as any to ask "is it over yet?" (For the 10th time, but who's counting?)
Let's talk about how this ends, shall we? (1/)
Every few months over the past 5 yrs, we've been reminded that the pandemic is over now, or perhaps it ended a long time ago, no one really knows.
The important thing is that it'll never go away, so we have to learn to live with it.
But not to worry, it's all very mild. (2/)
The dead moth buried in that word salad is the belief that newly emergent pathogens must eventually become endemic, that this process is about managing our own feelings about the situation.
A seven-stages-of-grief thing that we must all eventually accept. For our own good. (3/)
Been doing some thinking about how the pandemic will end (@TRyanGregory & @madistod have been great sounding boards).
In particular, focusing on two questions relevant for sc2:
1. What does biology teach us about emergent pathogens? 2. What can past pandemics teach us?
(1/)
TL; DR is weβre all gonna die.
Just kidding. (Actually true if you wait long enough, but that thought is not an original one).
Some interesting titbits, details to follow): (2/)
1. There is a wealth of biology literature on pathogen emergence & what happens to virulence.
Itβs a very well studied problem and the stuff you hear βexpertsβ say on the topic is quite different from what the literature says on it. The βexpertsβ are using 1980s textbooks. (3/)