People often stumble when trying to wrap their heads around what a cult is. Cults are defined more by what they DO than what they BELIEVE.
Understanding this distinction is crucial.
🧵
Cults are fundamentally more about their actions and the methods they use to enforce their beliefs than the beliefs themselves. It's the practices, the strict adherence to doctrine, and the enforcement mechanisms that set them apart from weird or whacky groups and communities.
We live in a world full of weird and wacky ideas. People believe in all sorts of things. But merely holding unusual or fringe beliefs doesn't necessarily make a group a cult.
Robert Jay Lifton, in his seminal work "Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism," provides valuable insights into how cults operate. He outlines specific mechanisms they use to exert control over their members' minds and actions.
One key aspect Lifton describes is "Milieu Control." This involves controlling the environment and all forms of communication, effectively isolating members from the outside world. This isolation strengthens the group's influence and weakens external perspectives.
Cults also enforce a "Demand for Purity." Cults create an us-vs-them mentality by pressuring members to conform to an unattainable ideal of purity. This creates guilt and shame, making members more submissive and dependent on the group for redemption.
"Sacred Science" refers to the group's doctrine being considered the ultimate, unchallengeable truth. Questioning or doubting the doctrine is not tolerated, which suppresses individual thought and reinforces the group's absolute authority.
Lifton discusses "Doctrine Over Person," where personal experiences or feelings that contradict the doctrine are dismissed or reinterpreted. The group's beliefs take precedence over individual realities, eroding personal autonomy.
With the "Cult of Confession," members are encouraged—or coerced—to confess past sins or doubts, often in group settings. This practice creates vulnerability and a loss of personal boundaries, which the cult can exploit.
"Mystical Manipulation" involves the group convincing members that their ideology is spiritually or supernaturally superior. They may interpret coincidences as divine signs, enhancing the perceived legitimacy of the group's mission.
Lastly, "Dispensing of Existence" is the idea that those outside the group are unworthy or unenlightened. The cult views itself as the sole possessor of truth, which justifies dismissing or devaluing those who don't conform.
It's these manipulative practices—controlling environments, restricting language, demanding purity, enforcing unchallengeable doctrines, overriding personal experiences, exploiting confessions, manipulating beliefs, and devaluing outsiders—that define a cult.
I think this distinction is an important one, and I hope this thread helps add some clarity to the topic.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a great question that others may find helpful.
Firstly, if you're going to adopt this approach, you should consider whether the facilitator is a person who is just vomiting info from some whack certification they earned or a person who does DEI professionally.
This approach only works on the professional grifters. The poor people facilitating something mandatory because they're forced to won't have answers to these questions, and, for many reasons, the approach likely won't work.
Ok, sample questions. Sincerity is key, and follow-up questions are the only play on the board. Just keep asking questions.
The facilitator is not your audience. The audience is your audience. The goal is to get the facilitator to simply answer questions truthfully.
Yesterday's thread was well received, so here's Joe Kincheloe's 10 central tenets of Critical Constructivism, i.e. "Woke."
1. "The world is socially constructed—what we know about the world always involves a knower and that which is to be known. How the knower constructs the known constitutes what we think of as reality."
They think reality is literally what they make it.
Critical Constructivism is a Marxist education theory claiming knowledge is socially constructed through power, not discovered as truth. Its roots trace back to Kant and Hegel, who first argued that what we perceive is shaped by our minds, not an objective reality.
Kant argued that the mind imposes structures—like space and time—on reality, meaning humans can never perceive the world as it truly is. This idea—that truth is subjective—was taken further by Hegel, who claimed truth evolves through historical contradictions.
Hegel’s dialectics shaped Marx, who argued that humans are creative and social, defining their "species being." The argument is too much for here, but this leads to an idealist epistemology through-and-through—a claim at the heart of Critical Constructivism.
Kant’s “Copernican revolution” in philosophy argues that we don’t discover the world as it is; we construct it. Kant leads directly to the principles of critical constructivism, i.e. "Woke"
2/ Kant says our knowledge doesn’t conform to external objects; instead, the objects of our experience conform to our knowledge. This subjective turn means we can't access "things in themselves"—only the appearances shaped by our own cognitive frameworks​.
3/ Joe Kincheloe's Critical Constructivism [technical term for Woke!] echoes Kant's position: “We can never apprehend the world in a 'true' sense, apart from ourselves and our lives." Kant's epistemology limits knowledge to our perspective, leaving us constructing a world through our subjective faculties.
Many atill think Rousseau was an enlightenment thinker, but his legacy lives through Kant, Hegel, and Marx. Why? Because at its core, Rousseau’s philosophy promotes the idea of unlimited Man and unlimited government—a radical departure from Enlightenment liberalism.
2. Enlightenment liberalism focused on limiting government to protect individual rights. Rousseau flipped this: he saw government as the instrument to bring about a moral transformation, where individual freedom is subsumed into the “general will.” Sound familiar?
3. Rousseau's belief in unlimited Man laid the groundwork for Kant’s moral philosophy and Hegel’s idea of the State as a manifestation of Spirit. For Rousseau, man's freedom isn’t about limiting power; it’s about achieving a higher moral unity through the collective.