Sarah Haider 👾 Profile picture
Oct 18 4 tweets 1 min read Read on X
This is one of those things guys have to intuit, because there isn’t much straightforwardness about it: Most straight women intensely punish displays of femininity in male partners.

They do not always say so, so as to be coherent with their politics. But also because that would defeat the purpose: Ideally one wants a man who is masculine, not merely performing masculinity.
Women aren’t straightforward with their sexual preferences not because they like to mess with men (why would they want fewer options?), but because it is far more devastating for a female to choose the wrong partner than it is for a male.

They want accurate signals.
The only workable advice for young men is: be clean, be fit, have interests, have functional knowledge, cultivate self-control and enjoy the resulting confidence.
If then YOU want to paint your nails *for you*—do it!

Rockstars can do it because it is a flex—they are so confident in their ability to get women that they can counter-signal—they can do what they like.

Truly self-confident men can get this self-expressive freedom too. But you can’t fake your way into it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sarah Haider 👾

Sarah Haider 👾 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SarahTheHaider

Nov 15, 2023
There has always been this unevenness to the Muslim vs. ex-Muslim discourse, and one of the reasons I am so sick of engaging in it.

Most Muslims know 0 ex-Muslims (or at least, think they do). Nearly all ex-Muslims know countless Muslims, often as blood relations.

1/
In practice, this means that many of us can feel compelled by deep ties to protect the interests of Muslims as people, despite opposing their faith.

But Muslims are not bound in the same way to us--we are a minority + often closeted. They don't "know" us, as we know them.

2/
The ex-Muslims who don't make the believer/belief distinction are almost always those who have lost all ties with family--a rare (but highly platformed/visible) occurrence.

Most of us can and do--we have to. We are too intimately connected with Muslims to do anything else.

3/
Read 5 tweets
Aug 4, 2023
She treats her body as ornamental, a truly literal interpretation of “my body my choice”.

Did anyone explain to her that bodies are functional, too? That one day she may mourn the fact that she gave up her ability to nourish her child?
Guaranteed this young woman has no one in her life who presented any other option to her.

She is totally engrossed in her echo-chamber, and has no access to any other mode of understanding.
@Aella_Girl It’s one thing to forgo the option of BFing given one’s situation at the time, but another to eliminate the possibility well before.

Not to mention, many women start to feel differently about it when they actually get pregnant (I did!).
Read 8 tweets
Jul 23, 2023
I’m not sure if it’s obvious that “men want to control women’s reproductive functions”.

Men can more easily oppose abortion than women, but if the situation was reversed (ie: if men bore children), I think women would be *even more* against abortion than men are today. 1
In other words: the abortion debate is skewed by sex only because one sex isn’t directly affected, but one could as easily take that to mean that men vote *unencumbered* on behalf of the fetus’ “right to life”, whereas women must choose between that and their own well-being. 2
But all things being equal women care *more* about the well-being of children,even fetuses. It’s often said that if men could get pregnant we’d have full abortion access. I disagree. In that case, the sex divide would *widen*—men more uniformly pro-abortion and women more anti. 3
Read 7 tweets
May 2, 2023
In my substack a few months ago I argued that we should expect tenure to *increase* the power of social stigma.

⬇️

open.substack.com/pub/sarahhaide…
The idea that financial security makes people brave is true only when their surroundings are not a monoculture.

In monocultures, financial incentives can be one of the few reasons to veer away from conformity, especially when conformity produces real world harms.
Despite tenure, academics are *reliably more conformist* than many other professions.

Beyond what I discuss in the post above, many argue that tenure process itself filters for conformity.

It might be worth asking whether the practice does more harm than good, all in all.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 27, 2023
She didn’t say adoptive parents aren’t mothers, Brian Tyler Cohen presumed that to make her seem worse than she is.

Step parenthood is a uniquely noble role, but it is often a different one than bio/adoptive parenthood.
One of the things that I find fairly off-putting about liberal politics is the drive to equalize all roles so that no one feels different, even if they literally are. Whether or not the difference is meaningful is a separate question, even then, MTG is more “mean” than “wrong”.
I know the responses to this will be a predictable “but my step parent was amazing / I love my step kids”.

Yes, sure. Can you look beyond your personal case? Do you deny also that step parents can bear their own *unique* challenges, therefore making their love more meaningful?
Read 4 tweets
Mar 6, 2023
It is so funny how many 1) clearly didn't listen to the podcast 2) are taking the name seriously.
Carl, its not "racial particularism" to recognize that people from shared backgrounds can have a different kind of conversation together.
It is not a claim of exclusive knowledge that others *cannot* have the same ideas or insights, just a fact of life that they likely don't.
There is a lot you don't have to explain to your interlocutor when certain elements are shared, and that facilitates a discussion with a different layer of depth.
A group of women might have a diff discussion about menopause than a group of men. Not "ID politics" to seek either.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(