π§΅: Esoteric data point confirms Ukraine proxy war is over. In a little-noticed development in late September, the British government's chief foreign policy advisor John Bew quit without warning or much in the way of explanation. Let's dive into why this is *highly* significant.
BACKGROUND: John Bew highly respected in British government circles. Hired by Boris Johnson and stayed on until now. Politico said of Bew, "nobody matters more when it comes to setting Global Britainβs course." Global Britain being delusion of restoring empire post-Brexit, ofc.
Bew stayed on despite Labour entering government. Keir Starmer reportedly begged him to. After all, Bew was completely central to British strategy in Ukraine. And Starmer was planning to ramp up Britain's role in the proxy war significantly, to the point of formal involvement.
As I have written and 'X'ed about extensively, Ukraine's Kursk incursion was a British operation. It was intended to normalise overt Western activity in the proxy war, in the hope others would follow suit. The US quite clearly rebuffed this invitation.
Starmer planned a major international charm offensive to get allies on board with Ukraine striking Russia, increased arms shipments, increased defence spending, the works. And Bew was central to this strategy. He was dispatched to Kiev personally to coordinate with Zelensky et al
So, Bew's abrupt departure hints entire strategy has been dropped. Important to note Bew has done a lot of work on "strengthening ties" with the US. It was no doubt hoped by Starmer he'd get Washington onside. And he failed. Now the UK won't endorse Zelensky's 'victory plan'.
Plentiful receipts on Kursk as British operation and conniving of British intelligence to get US into all-out war with Russia here. Failed this time round, but we must remain vigilant. British are willing to start World War III and could *probably* do it.
π§΅: As we appear to be heading into all-out war between Hezbollah and Israel, worth reflecting on how Beirut's military, security and intelligence agencies are heavily infiltrated by British assets, personnel and technology. Talk about fifth columnists...
We are to assume Lebanon's security apparatus will be working towards defeat for Hezbollah, directed by the British. So the conflict is likely to be as much a civil war as it is a regional conflict. London has been preparing for this for a long time:
Lebanon's Internal Security Forces infiltrated by British contractor Siren, led by veteran Royal Ulster cop Jonathan McIvor. ISF routinely use torture against inmates. So does the Palestinian Authority, also trained by McIvor:
π§΅: My take Kursk is a British operation US unhappy about has gotten lot of pushback, so let's dive into this. Key point is previously, Washington distanced iself from Kiev's escalatory actions by claiming a lack of foreknowledge. It has never actively condemned them. Until now.
On Aug 15th, Empire house journal Foreign Policy published scathing article on widespread US displeasure about the "counterinvasion" - from its "military logic", risk of escalation, and the "extremely awkward position" it has thrust Biden admin into.
A day later, The Times reported US had blocked Ukraine from firing British-made Storm Shadow missiles into Russia, which London greenlit with much fanfare months earlier. I took this as a sign the Empire had had enough of London's escalations and was seeking to rein in its client
π§΅: I speculated earlier was probably Britain behind Kursk suicide op. Lo and behold, a Times article confirms this. More broadly, contents amply underline Kursk latest effort by London to keep the US in the proxy war - and it appears Washington has finally had enough of this.
Times reveals up top heavily promoted footage of British Challenger 2 tanks in Kursk was a conscious, deliberate decision made by new PM Keir Starmer and his defence secretary John Healey. British equipment is said to have "played a central role" in the "counterinvasion".
First I'm hearing London greenlit Ukraine using British equipment to strike Russia in Feb 2022. As Active Measures exposed, British officials - including Boris Johnson - led a campaign to pressure countries providing Kiev with weapons to do the same.
It's NATO's 75th anniversary, so I visited beautiful Tasmajdan park to pay my respects to Milica, a bronze statue of a three year old girl killed in April 1999 by an alliance bombing raid. She was one of 89 children killed during NATO's criminal destruction of Yugoslavia.
Old enough to remember the jingoistic tubthumping in the British media, the claims NATO was crushing Milosevic with "precision" strikes, the calls for greater aggression. Meanwhile innocent people were dying and lives being destroying for *nothing*.
Never forgive. Never forget.
Publicly, NATO chiefs and media lackeys praised the bombing's effectiveness. Privately, British officials lamented that the campaign was achieving nothing, and the targets being struck were purely symbolic, for propaganda reasons. Civilian casualties were judged "worth the cost".
π§΅: No list of 'journalists' complicit in Julian Assange's torture and persecution by the Empire could be complete without Carole Cadwalladr. Her rap sheet is extensive as it is shameful, so we'll focus on the worst example, published in April 2017...
In March 2017, Nigel Farage visited Ecuadorian Embassy, trying to interview Julian Assange for @LBC. His request was denied. Cadwalladr, with some help from a "highly placed contact with links to US intelligence", spun this into a sinister effort to pass info from JA to Trump.
@LBC Cadwalladr admits this totally bogus story was fed to her by a "confidential source in the US". Presumably the same source quoted in the article. That source being the CIA. As has now been amply confirmed, the CIA was spying on Assange's every word/move in the Embassy all along.
π§΅: With Julian free, time to name and shame 'journalists' who threw him under the bus. Exhibit A, @AyoCaesar. In brief, she effectively justified his incarceration on the bogus grounds women were "waiting to have their day in court" against him:
'Assange is a rapist' psyop most devastatingly effective character assassination in history. People cheered his incarceration in Belmarsh, smearing his supporters as rape apologists. Fuck you all, from the bottom of my heart. @CaitOz has the receipts:
@caitoz Anyway, back to @AyoCaesar's shameful AIDS-tier drivel. She claimed Julian's supporters believed "men who are heroes cannot possibly be creeps" when in reality he "has a case to answer." He didn't. According to Swedish prosecutors and his own accusers (!!!) he didn't.