Thank you @Mike_Podhorzer for writing this so that I feel slightly less insane. The US is on the verge of real, bona fide, violent fascism of the sort we gawk at in history books and, to a first approximation, our civic leaders don't seem that worried. weekendreading.net/p/sleepwalking…
We are, in other words, sleepwalking our way into fascism *exactly the same way previous countries have sleepwalked their way into fascism*. Exactly. All the same beats, the same dynamics, the same rhetoric. We have learned NOTHING from history. It's just fucking amazing.
Nothing makes me want to simultaneously laugh & puke these days quite like the phrase "never again." Everyone says that in the wake of every fascist atrocity, with great solemnity, and yet we do it again. And again. We're doing it again right fucking now.
Like, did you think that when fascism came to America, it would come with a "Fascism In America" label? That it would come down to one unambiguous yes-or-no decision? That's not how it works. There's a whole book about how this: goodreads.com/book/show/9786…
"But the one great shocking occasion, when tens or hundreds or thousands will join with you, never comes."
"To live in this process is absolutely not to be able to notice it —please try to believe me —unless one has a much greater degree of political awareness, acuity, than most of us had ever had occasion to develop."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This quote from Trump captures the beating heart of reactionary authoritarianism better than anything I've ever seen: "I think it is a threat. I think everything is a threat. There is nothing that is not a threat."
That is not a conclusion drawn from evidence, it is ...
... reflective of deep psychological, even neurological, structures. For whatever reason -- genetics, early childhood development, whatever -- Trump has been left with hyperactive "sensitivity to threat," as they call it. Everything else issues from that.
High sensitivity to threat yields the classic authoritarian personality: averse to ambiguity or uncertainty; attracted to simplicity & clear lines between in groups & out groups; selfishness & an assumption that *everyone* is selfish & only threat of punishment maintains order.
Kudos to @Noahpinion for refusing this absurd assignment. And the @washingtonpost should be ashamed of itself for still, at this late date, failing to understand Trump & his movement. noahpinion.blog/p/against-stee…
As @whstancil has articulated so well, the whole appeal of fascism is that it releases you from any obligation to be decent or intellectually curious or coherent in your beliefs. It is a permission structure to wallow in your basest instincts, which is why it attracts assholes.
@whstancil When Trump tries to pitch his giant nationwide pogrom as a solution to the housing crisis, he is bullshitting. He's reverse engineering some plausible rationale for what he & his followers really want, which is to make brown people suffer.
I'm feeling pretty humorless these days but even I have to admit that protesting @mattyglesias is funny as shit.
I'm getting lots of weird private responses to this & they are irritating the shit out of me & I'm already in a bad mood, so I'm just gonna yell about this for a minute. Feel free to tune out.
The situation is, support for continued fracking is effectively ubiquitous in the US establishment -- leaders of both parties, wonks & policymakers, business types, most energy experts, most pundits. For better or worse, that's the reality.
One of my pet theories -- supported here by Science! -- is that decent, good-spirited people vastly outnumber angry reactionary dickheads (ARDs), but ARDs are uniquely *loud*, which causes everyone (including pols & policymakers) to dramatically overestimate their numbers.
This is supported by a bunch of studies showing that politicians drastically overestimate the conservatism of their constituents. It's because the ARDs make the most noise! They are more relentless, more fired up, more ubiquitous in discourse. nymag.com/intelligencer/…
I think this is true in virtually any social setting -- it was true back when people mostly communicated via pamphlets -- but the rise of RW media + the rise of social media have radically amplified the effect.
Democrats gave the US its best economy in decades, yet they are currently locked in a 50/50 race against deranged fascists.
So, we can say with confidence that "deliverism" didn't work, right? The theory has been decisively refuted. Can we agree on that? noahpinion.blog/p/let-us-pause…
"Deliverism," for those unfamiliar, was the idea, popular at the outset of Biden's 2020 term, that improving the material circumstances of voters would cut through -- outweigh, matter more than -- the fog of negative media. I was fond of the idea myself! But ... it didn't.
I just wish we could all agree on this, for the record, because it leads inevitably to the conclusion that *Dems must directly address the fog of negative media*. They can't get around it. They can't succeed in the face of it, even if they pull off economic miracles.
Consider: there was an enormous, horrific natural disaster, and the lies about it began *immediately*. Leftists lied about it. Conservatives lied about it. Trump lied about it. All kinds of social media randos lied about it, created weird AI images about it. Meanwhile ...
... the actual, boring, mainstream truth -- that aggressive gov't efforts were underway & working -- was effectively *nowhere*. What would once have been the main signal, the story that all the liars & charlatans defined themselves against, was effectively too quiet to hear.
That means, to average members of the public, absorbing news ambiently as they do, *only* the lies were audible. The lies swarmed immediately, everywhere. They are what most people heard, first & loudest.