I cannot stress this enough: if you acknowledge (as you now must) that the Biden-Harris administration is actively spying on Israel, if you believe that it is doing so continuously and broadly (with high-resolution imaging satellites and wiretaps, and immediately producing analysis, like it did this week), and if you believe that this is a longstanding practice across all U.S. administrations, then you necessarily must conclude that the U.S. was doing so on (and immediately prior to) 10/7 in Gaza, and on 10/7 in southern Israel — and you must acknowledge that it has said nothing about what it did or did not do with the information it collected and analyzed.
If your position is, “they’re always tapping everyone’s phones, NBD,” then your position also has to be “and they heard Israeli civilians, first responders, and military personnel across the Gaza border screaming for their lives and fighting for their lives on 10/7, and did nothing.”
I am sorry, but you need to face reality. If today’s intelligence leak is actually not a revelation about something new that the current administration is doing, then the U.S. had the intelligence needed to help Israel stop the 10/7 attacks either immediately before the attacks began or immediately after the attacks began — and just didn’t.
Pick your poison.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This U.S. soldier died from injuries sustained during the Biden-Harris administration’s foolish mission to deliver aid to Palestinians in Gaza via a temporary pier. It was a structural failure. Hamas attacked it regularly. It wasted $230 million. It cost this American his life.
If American troops were going to be put into harm’s way — and all deployments involve risk, from both combat and non-combat causes — that should only have been done to help rescue hostages, including the Americans still being held there, or to neutralize terrorist activity.
Not to give Palestinians food and other aid after Hamas hoarded so much of it into its terrror tunnels under Gaza. Not while Hamas continued (and still continues) starving, torturing, and killing hostages — again, including Americans — in those same tunnels. Not while Hamas continues attacking Israel, stealing more aid, and re-selling it to people in Gaza at a premium.
This is incredibly sad. He shouldn’t have been there. He shouldn’t have been sent there for this damned project, for this foolish idea. This shouldn’t have happened. It’s not right. May his memory be a blessing. May his family be comforted.
Sometimes, I still can’t believe all of this actually happened (see quoted tweet, and quoted tweet thread within it), but it did. A rather unusual experience, but I handled it well, and the matter ended in the right way. (He was convicted a few weeks ago.)
And before you ask, no, I did not get (or even seek) any kind of whistleblower / human source compensation or award related to my findings / disclosures about the company’s use of, and payments to, “third party” service providers — which actually turned out to be entities owned and operated by the same fraudster, as mentioned in the March 2023 Washington Post article about the fraudster’s arrest.
Just did what was right, and moved on.
I’m not sure what happened to all of the $3 million seized, or to the other tens of millions held in the name of the company by other entities that were also seized as part of the $630 million seizure mentioned in the initial charging documents (which, according to a superseding indictment, may actually have been many tens or hundreds of millions more). Fortunately, some of the money was returned to the victims of the wider fraud / racketeering scheme of which the company was just one part.
Life is crazy, folks. But you’ve always got to do the right thing.
Something I never mentioned publicly before, but can now. Six months after I left the company in 2022, a platform user who had used the platform to make numerous explicit threats to kill or grievously harm people (including to kill @Mike_Pence) was on trial in state court for making those threats.
Even though I no longer worked at the company, I had been its Director of Trust and Safety at the time the threats were made (and at the time that law enforcement reached out to us about it), and I remembered the situation very well, including the user’s handle, real name, the subpoena for his registration information, and his dangerous posts.
The company had never bothered to hire a new Director of Trust and Safety, which wasn’t surprising given their disturbing approach to platform safety (see quoted tweet thread). The prosecutors reached out to me to ask me to be a prosecution witness at the trial. They didn’t force me to do so, but they needed me, so I did. I flew to that state courthouse a few days later, got on the witness stand with the defendant and jury in the courthouse looking at me listening to me, and testified.
He was convicted, too. As a result, he can’t own a firearm. Which, given the dozens of violent threats and death threats he made, is probably a good thing.
Like I said, life is crazy.
@Mike_Pence (I know this story is crazy. But the threat against Pence was mentioned in that same March 2023 Washington Post article too. Yes, it was that same user I testified against. Yes, this actually happened.)
I don’t speak on behalf of AIPAC or work for AIPAC, but for two years, I and other young Americans who care about the U.S.-Israel relationship served on its Young Leadership Council in New York, advancing its mission to support America’s relationship with our ally Israel. 🧵
In the wake of Jamaal Bowman’s primary congressional campaign loss to Democrat George Latimer last night, Bowman’s campaign, supporters, and fellow-travelers have begun demonizing the critical work that AIPAC’s PAC is doing to support Democrats who support our diverse and democratic ally Israel.
Jamaal Bowman and his friends have lied that AIPAC is right-wing. It is not. It is bipartisan and non-partisan, and anyone who has volunteered with, worked with, or attended events hosted by AIPAC can confirm that. Virtually all of the friends I made through AIPAC are Democrats.
UPDATE: I filed a Title VI antisemitism complaint against @Harvard and @Harvard_Law with @usedgov @EDcivilrights ("OCR") in mid-November 2023. OCR still has not opened it for investigation. (This is separate from a different OCR complaint about *other* instances of antisemitism, at Harvard College, that OCR did open.) OCR has neither rejected my complaint nor opened it for investigation, but rather has continued stating to me, via written correspondence from the OCR attorney assigned to the case, that the complaint is still "under evaluation."
After I initially filed the complaint, the OCR attorney asked me for additional materials and evidence, and I satisfied those requests in full. But the case is still "under evaluation," even though I filed it over three months ago. Meanwhile, OCR quickly opened an investigation into a complaint alleging anti-Palestinian harassment at Harvard -- a mere eight days after it was filed.
It turns out that the OCR attorney assigned to the case, Emma Kim Milligan, is a Harvard College and @Harvard_Law graduate who (according to LinkedIn) was a research assistant for Professor Jon Hanson -- the very same @Harvard_Law professor who called Jews and Israelis "bigoted" "colonizers" who "blow up babies" and called the @EdWorkforceCmte hearing on antisemitism "bullshit." (See quoted tweet below.)
This is a terrible conflict of interest -- a Harvard double-alumnus is in charge of deciding if OCR opens an investigation in response to my complaint against Harvard University and Harvard Law School, and she used to be a research assistant for a Harvard Law professor who, as it turns out, is openly antisemitic. No wonder my complaint has not yet been opened for investigation.
I think it's about time that OCR opened my complaint for investigation -- and going forward, OCR should not have its evaluations of antisemitism complaints managed by OCR attorneys with obvious conflicts of interest.
If you can believe it, my OCR complaint that is still "under evaluation," the OCR complaint that *was* already opened (filed by a different complainant), and the civil suit against Harvard that mentions HLS Professor Jon Hanson, are about *different* situations and circumstances. There's so much insanity that has occurred at Harvard to Jewish students that these two OCR complaints, and the separate civil lawsuit, don't even overlap.
@Harvard @Harvard_Law @usedgov @EDcivilrights I can’t believe I filed an antisemitism complaint against Harvard with the government and the government actually assigned it to an antisemitic Harvard professor’s former research assistant, who also went to Harvard.
Folks, it’s very simple. It is ILLEGAL for schools to ignore anti-semitic chants and protests. It is a violation of Title VI for ANY school (including private schools) that receives federal funds (including federal student loan dollars) to ignore hostile environment harassment.
Constant on-campus chanting of “from the river to the sea” creates a hostile environment for Jews, just as chanting “pick cotton, boy” creates a hostile environment for African-American students. It is ILLEGAL for schools to fail to take corrective action against such protestors.
At a minimum, no aspect of the academic, extracurricular, or on-campus housing opportunities offered by the school can involve any student having to endure these chants. If they are forced to endure it, the school is violating the law. Period. That is the law.
The @Harvard_Law administration continues to ignore my requests for it to fill out this basic and required paperwork, thus preventing me from enrolling at any other law school (or other graduate or professional school) toward a degree for nearly FIVE years now. This is insanity.
For the record, all current and former students are entitled to this, without exception. Not providing this makes it impossible for me to transfer or restart my studies elsewhere, as it is a required document for application/enrollment, from all previous schools attended.
Meanwhile, prospective employers don’t understand why I haven’t completed my degree, whether from Harvard Law or elsewhere. They don’t believe that the Harvard Law administration would keep me from getting my law degree (or other graduate/professional degree) from any school.