Let me break it down for you with the latest insights from Japan.
Thread below 🧵 (1-10) 👇
1. The recent release of self-amplifying mRNA vaccines is a biological gamble. This isn’t just a next-gen booster; it’s about turning your body into a constant antigen factory. With no clear endpoint for replication, we’re tampering with evolutionary biology at the cellular level
2. SA-mRNA acts like a biological Trojan horse, coding your cells to self-replicate proteins endlessly. We’re engineering new pathways for evolution—ones we might not control. This isn’t about temp immunity; it’s permanent genetic programming with profound long-term consequences.
3. In nature, viruses & bacteria evolve within tightly regulated ecological systems. Now, with sr-mRNA, we’re injecting unregulated, lab-created systems into living organisms. This isn’t a vaccine—it’s an intervention in biological homeostasis. Are we equipped to handle that?
4. What happens when a SA-mRNA vaccine uses Alphavirus replicons—viruses capable of jumping across species? You’re not just modifying one person’s immune system; you are releasing genetic material into the environment, impacting species diversity, & collapsing ecosystems.
5. Japan was chosen because of its high social compliance and lower regulatory hurdles. But have we asked if it’s ethical to use a population again as guinea pigs? We’re injecting technology without fully understanding its biological consequences. That’s reckless. Genocide.
6. Self-amplifying mRNA doesn’t have the same “decay”rate as natural viral or bacterial infections. It replicates indefinitely, programming the body to keep producing antigens. With no “off-switch,” how do we know it won’t overrun natural immune processes & trigger autoimmunity?
7. Self-replicating mRNA blurs the line between organic and synthetic biology. Is this the first step toward transhumanism? Are we setting the stage for gene-altering vaccines to become the new normal? We are no longer curing diseases—we’re modifying human biology itself.
8. The shedding risk of SA-mRNA is real and under-discussed. These synthetic viruses could be transmitted via bodily fluids, impacting those who haven’t been injected. You could unknowingly become a vector of synthetic genetic material, altering the biology of those around you.
9. There are 0 long-term studies on the effects of self-amplifying mRNA.We don’t know how the constant replication will affect organ systems, fertility, or epigenetic programming. What happens to your biology in 10, 20, 30 years after exposure?We’re walking blind into the future!
10. What we’re doing with SA-mRNA isn’t evolution;it’s synthetic disruption. We’re forcing the body to produce viral proteins indefinitely without fully understanding the biological, ecological, & evolutionary consequences. Nature has rules, are we really prepared to break them?
🚨 Never take a mRNA Vaccine or anything similar again in your life. Those mandates need to stop asap and we need to ban and remove this deadly jabs from the market.
We also must confront our public officials regarding this topic and fight for our future generations and planet.
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nearly six years after COVID began, not one world leader has seriously examined what the vaccines did to the people they harmed.
Not one investigation. Not one parliamentary inquiry with genuine teeth. Not one head of state who has stood at a podium and said, we owe the injured an honest accounting and we are going to provide it.
The silence is universal. And it is coordinated in a way that individual negligence cannot explain.
This is the observation that matters most to me, more than any document, more than any leaked communication, more than any specific piece of evidence. Because the behaviour of every major government simultaneously tells you something that the individual pieces cannot tell you alone.
Genuine public health emergencies produce genuine review. What worked. What did not. Who was harmed and how. That is what accountable institutions do.
What we have instead is a wall.
And on the other side of that wall, the vaccine injured, still without diagnostic codes, still without compensation, still without the basic acknowledgment that what happened to them was real.
While Long COVID is promoted heavily by the same governments and the same media that will not ask a single honest question about the injections. The parallel presentations. The overlapping symptoms. The convenient framing that points everywhere except at the product.
The universal silence of world leaders on vaccine injury is not the behaviour of people who have nothing to hide.
It is the behaviour of people who have collectively decided that the cost of honesty exceeds the cost of continued silence.
“Drops the book Suicidal Empathy. … I wanted the cover to be as evocative as the concept, right? Dying to be kind.”
The lamb carrying the “Free the Wolves” sign says it all.
Credit to @GadSaad @joerogan @JRE_Clips
Judge Feels Sorry for Trump Assassin
“The guy who tried to assassinate President Trump… the judge went and said, ‘I am so sorry that you’re not being treated nicely. You have a room without a window. This is just… it’s mean.’”
Empathy for the assassin, not the victim. This is where we are.
COVID’s Social Autopsy — How a Society Was Divided From Within
The Strategy of Division
What happened to families, friendships, and communities during COVID was not an unfortunate side effect of a public health crisis.
It was the predictable and in some cases deliberately engineered, outcome of a communication strategy that required an enemy.
Every effective propaganda campaign needs a target. Someone whose existence explains the ongoing threat. Someone whose behaviour justifies the continuation of emergency measures. Someone onto whom the fear and frustration of the compliant population can be redirected.
During COVID that target was the non-compliant.
The unmasked. The unvaccinated. The people asking questions. The ones who looked at the data and reached different conclusions than the institutions wanted them to reach.
They were not simply wrong in the official framing. They were dangerous. Selfish. Responsible for the deaths of others. A threat to the people you loved most.
That language was not chosen carelessly. I wrote about that in my Autopsy of the Psychological Language being used during the pandemic.
It was chosen because it works. It transforms a policy disagreement into a moral emergency. It makes the questioning neighbour feel like a physical threat. It gives the compliant person not just permission but obligation to enforce, to cut off, to report, to condemn. And it worked.
Across millions of families. Across decades of friendships. Across communities that had survived economic crises, political disagreements, and genuine tragedies, but could not survive this particular, carefully manufactured divide.
They want us to be divided and against each other, so instead of fighting and fueling the fire. Use that energy towards those who initiated it.
To understand what happened you need to understand what fear does to the social brain.
Human beings are tribal animals.
The deepest evolutionary programming we carry is oriented toward two things, belonging to the group and identifying threats to the group. These are not rational processes. They operate beneath the threshold of conscious reasoning and they operate fast.
When fear is sufficiently activated and the COVID communication strategy was designed to maximise fear, the social brain begins sorting. Safe and dangerous. Us and them. Compliant and threatening.
This sorting is not primarily about evidence. It is about emotional contagion and social signal. If the people around you are frightened and the institutions you trust are saying the threat is real and human, the programming activates regardless of whether the underlying claim withstands scrutiny.
And here is the part that makes it so effective as a tool of social control.
Once the sorting has occurred, once someone has placed a family member or friend in the category of threat, reversing that placement is psychologically costly. It requires admitting that the fear was manipulated. That the relationship was sacrificed on the altar of a manufactured emergency. That the person they cut off or condemned was not dangerous but simply inconveniently honest.
Most people cannot afford that admission.
So the division persists long after the emergency has passed.
The government did not need to keep the divide active. It had been internalised.
Jesus Did Not Come to Bring Peace. He Came to Bring a Sword.
Matthew 10:34.
Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.
This passage has confused comfortable Christianity for two thousand years. How does the Prince of Peace speak about a sword?
Because He understood something that sentimentality about faith always tries to avoid.
Truth divides.
Not because truth is divisive by nature, but because truth, when it arrives in a world organised around comfortable lies, necessarily separates those who are willing to see from those who are not. It separates those who will pay the cost of honesty from those who will pay any cost to avoid it.
The sword is not violence. It is discernment. The cutting edge of genuine reality meeting a world that has organised itself around its absence.
COVID drew exactly this line.
Not between vaccinated and unvaccinated, that was the line the institutions drew. The deeper line was between those willing to look honestly at what was happening and those who needed not to look. Between those who could tolerate the discomfort of an inconvenient truth and those for whom that discomfort was genuinely intolerable.
That line ran through families.
Through marriages. Through friendships of decades.
Jesus said it would. He said a man’s enemies would be members of his own household. He was not predicting something that should not happen. He was describing the inevitable consequence of standing for truth in a world that prefers its absence.
They were chosen by people who understood exactly what they were doing.
“Safe” does not operate on the rational mind. It operates on the nervous system. When an authority figure, a doctor, a government official, a trusted institution, declares something safe, the amygdala receives a direct signal. Stand down. The threat assessment has been completed by someone qualified to do it. Your fear is no longer required.
This is why the phrase was so effective and why it was repeated so relentlessly.
Repetition is not emphasis in propaganda ,it is replacement. Say a thing enough times and it stops being a claim that requires evidence and becomes a background assumption that the mind no longer examines. Safe and effective became wallpaper. It was everywhere. On television. From podiums. In the voices of doctors who had themselves absorbed it from the institutional infrastructure they trusted.
“Effective” paired with it perfectly because together they formed a pre-emptive closure of the only two questions a rational person would ask about a medical intervention.
Is it safe? Yes. Is it effective? Yes. Move along.
What was never said , because the phrase was designed to prevent the asking , was any of the following. Safe for whom? At what age? With what pre-existing conditions? Over what timeframe? With what level of certainty given the truncated trial duration? Compared to what alternatives? With what known and unknown risk profile?
Effective at what specifically? At preventing infection? The trials did not demonstrate that with the confidence the phrase implied. At preventing transmission? This was never established by the trial data ,a fact that Pfizer’s own representative acknowledged under direct questioning before the European Parliament. At preventing severe disease in the elderly? There was signal there. In healthy young adults and children? The calculation was always far less clear.
“Safe and effective” was not a summary of evidence.
It was a replacement for it.
And the people who repeated it most loudly were, in many cases, people who had never read the primary data, who had absorbed the phrase from the institutional environment and passed it along with the confidence of someone who has mistaken familiarity for knowledge.
This is what made it so dangerous. The most effective propaganda does not require conscious deception at every level of the chain. It requires only that the phrase travel far enough that the people repeating it genuinely believe it and genuinely cannot understand why anyone would question something so obvious.
II. „Trust the Science“
The Inversion of Everything Science Actually Is
Science is not a set of conclusions.
It is a process. a method of systematically testing claims against reality through observation, hypothesis, controlled experimentation, peer review, and the ongoing revision of understanding as new evidence emerges. What makes science trustworthy is precisely its built-in mechanism for self-correction. The willingness to be wrong. The institutional commitment, at its best , to following evidence wherever it leads regardless of who it inconveniences.
“Trust the science” collapses all of that into a single authority claim.
It does not say, here is the methodology, here are the data sets, here are the confidence intervals, here are the competing hypotheses, here are the limitations of what we currently know, here is the peer-reviewed debate happening in real time among serious researchers who disagree with each other as scientists always do.
It says: defer.
Stop asking. The process has been completed by credentialed people and your role is not inquiry but compliance.
This is not science. It is the performance of scientific authority in the service of administrative control. And it worked, devastatingly well, because it weaponised the genuine public respect for scientific achievement against the very epistemological humility that makes science worth respecting.
The history of medicine is a history of people who refused to simply trust the science as it stood. Semmelweis, who understood that doctors were killing patients through unwashed hands and was institutionalised for saying so. Barry Marshall, who drank a solution of Helicobacter pylori to demonstrate that stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria rather than stress, against the established consensus and won the Nobel Prize for it. Every paradigm shift, every genuine advance, required someone willing to stand in front of the settled consensus and say the evidence points somewhere else.
“Trust the science” would have silenced every one of them.
What the phrase exploited was a specific feature of how most people relate to expertise. Most people, reasonably and necessarily, delegate their trust in technical domains to those with specialist knowledge. They do not have the time or training to evaluate primary research in epidemiology or vaccinology. So they rely on institutions that are supposed to do that evaluation honestly on their behalf.
“Trust the science” hijacked that delegation.
It positioned the institutional position , which was shaped by funding relationships, by regulatory capture, by the career incentives of the people making decisions, by the political pressures of a crisis. as synonymous with the scientific process itself.
And anyone who questioned the institutional position was positioned as questioning science, conspiracy theorist and a right winger.
That move was not accidental. It was the most sophisticated element of the entire psychological operation. Because it meant that the more someone actually engaged with the primary literature , the more carefully they read the trial data, the biodistribution studies, the adverse event reports , the more they were characterised as anti-science by people who had not read any of it.
It inverted the epistemological hierarchy entirely.
Ignorance of the data, combined with institutional deference, became the definition of being pro-science.
Engagement with the data, combined with independent conclusions, became the definition of dangerous misinformation.
III. „Pandemic of the Unvaccinated“
The Scapegoat Mechanism at Scale
To understand this phrase you need to understand what it was responding to.
By mid to late 2021 it was becoming undeniable, through data from highly vaccinated countries including Israel and the United Kingdom , that vaccinated individuals were contracting and transmitting the virus in significant numbers. The promise of sterilising immunity, of ending transmission chains, of reaching herd immunity through vaccination, was not being realised in the way the public had been led to expect.
This created a psychological and political crisis for the institutions that had staked their credibility on the programme.
The response was “pandemic of the unvaccinated.”
René Girard spent his career documenting the scapegoat mechanism — one of the oldest and most reliable tools of social management in human history. When a community is under stress, when anxiety is high and the source of that anxiety is diffuse or systemic and therefore difficult to address directly, the community converges on a designated figure or group who absorbs the collective tension. The scapegoat is expelled or punished. The community experiences temporary relief. The actual source of the tension remains entirely unaddressed.
The mechanism does not require conscious coordination. It emerges naturally from the dynamics of frightened social groups, which is precisely what makes it so reliable and so dangerous.
“Pandemic of the unvaccinated” told a frightened, frustrated population that their ongoing fear had a human cause and a human face. The problem was not the virus, not the institutional failures, not the gap between what was promised and what was delivered. The problem was the people who had refused. Who had been selfish. Who had prolonged the pandemic through their stubbornness and their irresponsibility.
This reframing accomplished several things simultaneously.
It redirected blame. The anger that might have been directed at the institutions that had overpromised and underdelivered was channelled instead toward neighbours, family members, colleagues.
It reinforced the binary. There were two kinds of people, the responsible and the irresponsible, the compliant and the dangerous. This binary made ambivalence socially impossible. You were on one side or the other.
It gave the anxiety of the vaccinated a socially sanctioned outlet. The relief of having something to be angry at, something human and proximate and theoretically controllable, was immense. And the anger was performed publicly, which added social reward to the emotional relief.
And it was wrong.
The data that was already available and that the institutions promoting this phrase had access to showed that vaccinated individuals were transmitting the virus. The framing was not merely misleading. It was a deliberate choice to assign causation to a group when the causal picture was far more complicated.
But its psychological function did not require factual accuracy.
It required emotional plausibility in a population that was frightened, exhausted, and desperate for the story to have a villain that was not the story itself.
It found that plausibility.
And the people who bore the cost of it, the unvaccinated who were excluded, defamed, fired, and in some cases denied medical care, paid a real price for a lie that served the interests of institutions unwilling to account honestly for their own failures.
That is the scapegoat mechanism.
As old as human society.
For the last five years I have been fighting for my life after one Moderna COVID vaccine on July 21, 2021 triggered a cytokine storm and unleashed a rare neuromuscular disease plus multi-system damage that has left me 80% bedridden.
Immediately after the vaccination I felt the poison in my body – and my life changed forever
An ongoing thread journal of my vaccine injury.🧵
Three days after the shot I was in the ICU, then spent six brutal weeks in the ER and hospital. What followed has been a living nightmare no one should ever have to endure.
I am now confined to my bedroom for over 23 months. I cannot work. I cannot drive. I cannot grocery shop. I cannot walk more than a quarter mile (most days far less). I have not left my house in three years. Eating takes an hour per meal because of severe dysphagia, constant choking sensation, esophagus and larynx spasms, jaw and face muscle wasting. Talking for more than a few minutes triggers chest tightness, breathing spasms, and stroke-like episodes. Breathing itself is compromised by a partially paralyzed diaphragm.
Every single day, without exception, I endure:
• Ischemic stroke-like attacks 2–4 times daily (esophageal/laryngeal spasms, hypercranial pressure, sinus swelling, occipital and trigeminal neuralgia that steal my breath)
• Whole-body neuropathic pain, ribcage nerve pain, muscle spasms, TMJ lock, electrical shocks through the face and skull
• Crushing mitochondrial/histamine-driven fatigue waves that force me horizontal within 2–3 hours of waking
• Instability, muscle weakness, sensation of falling even when seated
• Gut dysbiosis, vagus nerve dysfunction, food intolerances, and spontaneous disgorgement
I was once an Art Director in the movie and gaming industry, traveling to over 100 countries, running and walking miles in nature, living at the absolute peak of my physical and professional life. That life ended the day I was vaccinated.
I have seen over a dozen doctors. Most dismissed me as psychosomatic, paranoid schizophrenic, depressed, bipolar, or even “right-wing extremism.”
One diagnosis I sued and won to get removed from my record. A lumbar puncture meant to help only made me dramatically worse. I have spent over $60,000 on every treatment the vaccine-injured community has tried, apheresis, NAD infusions, immune therapies, ozone therapy, Maraviroc, ivermectin, supplements. none gave meaningful lasting relief. I have been completely off all medications and centralized treatments for over two years.
I became my own doctor. I turned to nature: sunlight (heliotherapy), grounding, circadian rhythm alignment, organic seasonal food, avoiding EMFs and artificial light. I study light biology, quantum medicine, psychology, and Scripture daily. My faith in God and the Christ within is what carries me when the body wants to quit.
Yet every winter my symptoms surge. Every cold month feels like the disease is progressing. Doctors, government, friends, and even some family have walked away. I understand, no one wants to carry a burden like this.
This is not a life. It is survival. But I am still here. Still hopeful. Still believing that healing is possible through God, nature, and the truth finally being told.
I am one of the countless vaccine-injured who have been denied, dismissed, and abandoned by the very systems that told us it was safe. Our stories are real. Our suffering is real. The silence must end.
I will keep speaking for every injured person who cannot. I will keep sharing the truth, the science, the faith, and the hope. because if we don’t, no one will.
To every vaccine-injured warrior reading this: you are not alone. Your pain is not imaginary. Your fight matters. We see you. We stand with you.
To everyone else: please listen. Please believe us. Please help us demand acknowledgment, proper study, real care, and justice.
God is not finished with us yet. Better days are coming, for all of us.
May God bless you. Peace be with you. 🙏
80% bedridden. Daily ischemic stroke-like spasms, dysphagia, and breathing issues from vaccine-triggered neuromuscular disease. Once active traveler, now fighting from bed with faith.
Five years post-Moderna: 80% bedridden, ALS. histamine attacks and stroke-like symptoms hit daily. Winter reversed progress. Once peak-fit Art Director traveling the world, now horizontal most days. Faith and nature keep me going.
Magnetic declination has increased tremendously on Earth. And it's happened unbelievably over the last 50 years.
The magnetic North Pole ran from Canada to Siberia.
Not slowly. Not imperceptibly. At a rate that is accelerating and that geophysicists are tracking with increasing concern, the magnetic north pole moving faster than at any point in recorded measurement history.
The standard explanation is internal, convection currents in the liquid outer core, the natural dynamics of a planetary magnetic system that has reversed many times over geological history.
But here is the question worth asking.
Humanity has blanketed the surface of this planet with an electromagnetic infrastructure of extraordinary density and power in an extraordinarily short period of time. Power lines. Radio towers. Radar. WiFi. Satellites. 4G. 5G. The cumulative non-native electromagnetic output of eight billion people and their technology operating continuously across every continent and ocean.
Whether this contributes to shifts in the planetary magnetic field is a question that mainstream geophysics has not seriously engaged with, partly because the instrumentation and modelling required is complex, and partly because the question implicates industries with enormous economic and political power.
What is not in question is the biological consequence of a weakening and shifting geomagnetic field.
Researchers suggest that Schumann Resonances and geomagnetic activity act as external "time-givers" that synchronize human circadian rhythms, brain waves, and hormonal balances.
A central hypothesis posits that consciousness itself may be an intrinsic property of magnetic fields, mediated by magnetite crystals and cryptochrome proteins within the body that function as quantum sensors.
Evidence indicates that fluctuations in these fields can trigger epigenetic changes, altering DNA methylation and potentially influencing risks for cardiovascular or neurological diseases.
Every living system on this planet evolved within the Schumann resonances, the electromagnetic frequencies generated between the earth’s surface and ionosphere. Every circadian system. Every mitochondria. Every navigating bird and migrating whale. The geomagnetic field is not background. It is infrastructure. Biological infrastructure that life has depended on for hundreds of millions of years.
As it shifts and weakens, whether from internal dynamics, from human electromagnetic output, or from both, the coherence between living systems and the planetary field they evolved within degrades.
We are becoming, as @DrJackKruse has more like Mars.
And nobody is asking why. @elonmusk
Over the past fifty years, magnetic declination has undergone a dramatic shift. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the British Geological Survey, and successive updates to the World Magnetic Model, the pole’s drift accelerated to 50–60 kilometers per year during the 2000s and continues at 22–35 kilometers per year today. This movement reflects a fundamental change in Earth’s core dynamo: magnetic flux is weakening beneath Canada while strengthening beneath Siberia. It is not climate theater. It is the planet’s internal particle accelerator altering its Lagrangian geometry, and every ATP synthase motor in your cells is now contending with the resulting entropy costs.
Human physiology evolved under a far more stable geomagnetic environment. Our inner navigational systems, the thalamus, sphenoid bone, vagus nerve, and Meckel’s cave, were calibrated for a stronger, more consistent field. When declination changes, the proton motive force across the inner mitochondrial membrane becomes disordered.
Deuterium accumulates in the matrix as the cellular vortex loses its ability to fractionate isotopes efficiently. Exclusion-zone water dehydrates, tissue oxygen tension declines, reactive oxygen species surge, and the circadian clock is deprived of its magnetic reference.
Melanin is among the first structures compromised.
The clinical consequences are already visible at higher latitudes: rising rates of type 1 diabetes, neurodegenerative disease, autoimmune disorders, and otherwise unexplained hypoxia. Marine biologists have observed the early warning signs in the Oslofjord, fish developing tubular hearts and Beggiatoa bacterial mats suffocating the seafloor.
This geophysical reality has been obscured by decades of carbon-focused narratives and institutional priorities. Conventional medicine, still largely shaped by Rockefeller Medicine frameworks, responds with pharmaceuticals that further strain the Landauer limit rather than addressing the root energetic mismatch.
Credit to @DrJackKruse
In the elegant symphony of human physiology, the Woodward effect and the Bernoulli Lift emerge not as distant principles of theoretical physics, but as foundational forces shaping the intimate collaboration between heart and brain.
Together, they orchestrate three primary vortexes within the human Lagrangian. These are precise, dynamic systems that sustain life at the quantum and gravitational scales.
This is the realm of decentralized medicine, where ancient evolutionary design meets the physics of our changing world.
Consider the vortices in turn. First, the ATPase nanomotor, the rotary engine of the mitochondrion, spins at an astonishing 9,000 revolutions per second, driven by protons (H⁺). Its velocity is inextricably linked to the isotopic concentration of hydrogen in metabolic water; Kleiber’s law, long attributed to body size, is in fact governed by these isotopic ratios in blood, metabolic water, and cerebrospinal fluid.
Second, the circulatory system itself functions as a masterful vortex generator. The heart, a helical muscle refined over evolutionary time from single-chambered forms to the four-chambered mammalian masterpiece, builds ever-greater vortical power. This escalation enables the Mach effect essential for bipedal sapiens, propelling blood with the efficiency demanded by upright posture and cerebral demands.
Third, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) vortex forms within the ventricular system of the central nervous system, a subtle yet critical swirl that maintains neural coherence and nutrient distribution.
At the heart of these systems lies an extraordinary insulator: cholesterol paired with DHA. This high-dielectric constant molecule shields the brain’s quantum vortex, centered in the third and fourth ventricles, and the heart’s gravitational/torsional vortex in the left ventricle. In an era when Earth’s magnetic shield is actively warping (as confirmed by the 2025/2026 geomagnetic maps), elevated cholesterol, particularly in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), is not a genetic defect but an adaptive high-gain magnetic shielding response.
It protects delicate vortical machinery from the inertial drag and isotopic shear imposed by a shifting geomagnetic field. When sunlight deprivation renders blood thixotropic, arterial walls endure the resulting shear forces; the cardiovascular system, engineered for vortical flow, compensates by reinforcing its dielectric armor.youtube.com/watch?v=drdn_h…
To maintain the spin of these intertwined tornadoes of blood and CSF amid a dynamically changing geomagnetic environment requires nothing less than masterful electrical engineering within the human Lagrangian. Cholesterol/DHA provides the dielectric constant; sunlight, structured water, and coherent movement supply the fuel. The body has always known what centralized medicine has overlooked. The question is whether we will align with its wisdom or continue to misinterpret its elegant adaptations.