When a partnership is sued, and only one partner steps forward to respond while the others sit back in silence, the situation becomes a textbook case of irresponsibility and lack of foresight.
Partnerships—unless structured as limited liability partnerships (LLPs)—usually operate under joint and several liability. BTC Core is not.
This means every partner is on the hook for the full weight of any legal claims or debts. When some partners don't respond, the court won't chase them down immediately; instead, they’ll direct their focus on the one partner who did show up.
It’s a sad reality that in such cases, justice often takes the path of least resistance.
Partnerships—unless structured as limited liability partnerships (LLPs)—usually operate under joint and several liability. BTC Core is not.
This means every partner is on the hook for the full weight of any legal claims or debts. When some partners don't respond, the court won't chase them down immediately; instead, they’ll direct their focus on the one partner who did show up.
It’s a sad reality that in such cases, justice often takes the path of least resistance.
Now, what happens when the absent partners don’t respond?
The partner left holding the bag faces the brunt of the legal action. They may be hit with the entire judgment amount, regardless of their stake in the partnership or how involved they were in the issue at hand.
This is the very nature of joint liability. Even though all the partners are technically liable, the one person standing in court is the easiest target for the plaintiff. It’s as simple as that—lawsuits, like most things, are often about efficiency, not fairness.
The partner left holding the bag faces the brunt of the legal action. They may be hit with the entire judgment amount, regardless of their stake in the partnership or how involved they were in the issue at hand.
This is the very nature of joint liability. Even though all the partners are technically liable, the one person standing in court is the easiest target for the plaintiff. It’s as simple as that—lawsuits, like most things, are often about efficiency, not fairness.
Then there’s the problem of financial capability. If the lone partner who responded can’t handle the financial load of the judgment, the consequences can be devastating.
They could end up losing personal assets, seeing their wages garnished, or watching their bank accounts drained because the legal system has them in its crosshairs.
And just because the other partners are also responsible doesn't mean the court will pursue them right away. In practical terms, this partner faces financial ruin, while the others walk away untouched, at least for now.
They could end up losing personal assets, seeing their wages garnished, or watching their bank accounts drained because the legal system has them in its crosshairs.
And just because the other partners are also responsible doesn't mean the court will pursue them right away. In practical terms, this partner faces financial ruin, while the others walk away untouched, at least for now.
But let’s not forget that the responding partner does have a sliver of hope.
After paying off the judgment, they can seek contribution from the non-responding partners. In other words, they can file lawsuits to get their fellow partners to pay their fair share of the liability.
But this is where reality sets in. Litigation is expensive, time-consuming, and uncertain. Even if they win, there’s no guarantee that the other partners will have the resources to pay. It’s a perfect storm of legal and financial peril, with no easy way out.
After paying off the judgment, they can seek contribution from the non-responding partners. In other words, they can file lawsuits to get their fellow partners to pay their fair share of the liability.
But this is where reality sets in. Litigation is expensive, time-consuming, and uncertain. Even if they win, there’s no guarantee that the other partners will have the resources to pay. It’s a perfect storm of legal and financial peril, with no easy way out.
And let’s not ignore the obvious consequence for those who sit on their hands.
The partners who don’t respond (Blackrock?) could end up with a default judgment against them.
When you don’t show up to court, the court doesn’t wait—it issues a judgment by default. While the lone partner is left facing the immediate heat, those who didn’t respond are simply delaying their day of reckoning.
Sooner or later, the plaintiff might (likely will if they are large) come for them, too.
Ignoring a lawsuit doesn’t make it disappear.
The partners who don’t respond (Blackrock?) could end up with a default judgment against them.
When you don’t show up to court, the court doesn’t wait—it issues a judgment by default. While the lone partner is left facing the immediate heat, those who didn’t respond are simply delaying their day of reckoning.
Sooner or later, the plaintiff might (likely will if they are large) come for them, too.
Ignoring a lawsuit doesn’t make it disappear.
In the end, when only one partner responds to a lawsuit, they end up shouldering the burden that should be spread among all.
It is a classic example of irresponsibility and the legal consequences that follow. If all the partners don’t stand together, one person ends up paying the price, and that price can be steep.
It’s a scenario that should serve as a warning to anyone who enters into a partnership without understanding the full weight of joint and several liability.
It is a classic example of irresponsibility and the legal consequences that follow. If all the partners don’t stand together, one person ends up paying the price, and that price can be steep.
It’s a scenario that should serve as a warning to anyone who enters into a partnership without understanding the full weight of joint and several liability.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
