On Saturday, I received a letter from the DWP telling my partner about changes to Winter Fuel Payment.
My partner died on Thursday 19th September. I informed the DWP of his death on Friday 27th September using the online "Tell Us Once" service. 1/
My partner's state pension has already been stopped. I did not understand why they were writing to him about WFP, since clearly they knew he was dead. 2/
I rang the phone number on the letter. It comes up on my smartphone as the Government of Northern Ireland Environment department. The initial message asks in English if you want to speak to someone in English, then repeats the message in Irish. 3/
But nonetheless it is the correct phone number for WFP. If you select "speak to someone in English", you are put through to the DWP's WFP menu.
There are only two options on the WFP menu:
1 - find out about Pension Credit
2 - help with heating costs
Nothing else. 4/
Obviously, neither option was relevant, so I decided to press 1 and ask the respondent to put me through to the bereavement team.
After navigating another menu and listening to a whole shpiel about Pension Credit, I eventually spoke to a human being. 5/
I pointed out that the DWP had already been informed of my partner's death and asked why they had sent the letter.
The genius told me that even though my partner was deceased he would still be entitled to WFP if he claimed Pension Credit. I kid you not. 6/
When I said this was ridiculous, she told me I had to speak to the Winter Fuel Payments team. I had, of course, rung the Winter Fuel Payments phone number. Apparently option 1 on the Winter Fuel Payments phone menu does not go to the Winter Fuel Payments team. 7/
She told me to redial and press option 2. I asked her to put me through to the WFP team. She refused to do so, insisted I had to redial, and hung up.
She was, to be frank, bloody rude. Is this how you treat bereaved people, @DWPgovuk? 8/
So I redialed and pressed option 2. After navigating a complex series of menus and listening to more spiels about Pension Credit, I eventually got to a menu which included an option for a person ringing on behalf of someone who has died. I pressed it. 9/
I eventually got through to another human being. I explained that the recipient of the letter was deceased, that the DWP had been informed of his death, and asked why they had sent the letter. 10/
Initially, she said that the letter had been sent before I notified the DWP. I know the postal service is bad, but this isn't credible.
When I said that wasn't a reasonable explanation, she put me on hold so she could find out from someone else why the letter was sent. 11/
And this is where it becomes really, really bad.
When she returned, she told me that the DWP was sending the letters to everyone who had ever made a claim, including people who had died.
So thousands of bereaved spouses, partners & relatives are receiving these letters. /12
She told me that to ensure as many people as possible find out about the changes to WFP, DWP is ignoring official notifications of death and literally spamming the relatives of deceased WFP claimants.
I am horrified. /13
And as a final insult, this second genius told me to label the letter "Deceased" and return it to the DWP.
What is the point of a "Tell Us Once" service if @DWPgovuk has to be told twice?
I am not going to do any such thing. The letter is going in the bin.
/end of rant
unroll please @threadreaderapp
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is idiotic. The hostages are in Gaza. Israel controls all movement of goods and people in and out of Gaza, and its military campaign creates serious risks for NGO staff. Clearly Israel must consent to allow Red Cross staff into Gaza and make it safe for them to do so.
This is idiotic too. The reason the BBC (and other news organisations) preface "Gaza health ministry" with "Hamas-run" is to issue a content warning on the information provided by the health ministry, not to validate Hamas.
I really don't know where to start with this ludicrous piece of analysis. The ages of casualties is factual reporting, as are family relationships if known. Reporting child deaths does of course evoke sympathy, but that's not a reason not to report them.
I am reminded of them every time I enter @RochesterCathed and see the shadows of the paintings that were hacked off the walls, plastered over or whitewashed, and the banner in the Quire listing the Bishops of Rochester that starts with John Fisher and ends with Nicholas Ridley.
John Fisher was executed by Henry VIII for refusing to recognise him as head of the Church in England and opposing his marriage to Anne Boleyn. He is a Saint in the Roman Catholic Church.
Nicholas Ridley was burned at the stake by Henry's daughter Mary for denying the Roman Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation. He is one of the "Oxford Martyrs" of the Church of England.
There can be no private sector solution to the crisis engulfing water companies that does not involve very large increases in customer bills. Nationalise them.
These companies provide a finite resource to a restricted population. Their revenue comes almost entirely from customer payments. The idea that shareholders can have high returns AND customers low bills necessarily means inadequate investment and/or unsustainable debt.
For over thirty years, water companies and regulators shut their eyes to the long-term impossibility of delivering high returns to shareholders while keeping customer bills low. But now the wheels are coming off.
Blimey. And you thought Thames Water was complicated. This is Southern Water. Topco (Greensands Holdings Ltd) is registered in Jersey.
That strange arrangement at the bottom of the chart is a Whole Business Securitisation similar to that in Thames Water. And as with Thames Water, there is external debt in the parasitical extractive structure built on top of the regulated utility.
Here's a helpful table explaining the purpose of each level in this structure, along with how it has changed since Ofwat stomped on it in 2022 (closed down its Cayman SPVs, basically, though it doesn't explicitly say this here)
I watched the BBC Storyville documentary about Yosef Weitz again last night. Interesting detail I missed the first time: clip of an Israeli academic saying that Ben-Gurion commissioned an academic research paper to "prove" that Palestinians chose to leave in 1948... 1/
... he emphasised that Ben-Gurion didn't want genuine academic research to find out the reasons why Palestinians left, he wanted an academic paper to support his story that Palestinians freely chose to leave and were not driven out by the IDF. Astonishing. /2
I have been told this story many times by Israeli accounts. I found it hard to believe, because it seemed inconsistent with what I was reading about Zionist military action in 1948. People fleeing in fear of their lives seemed much more likely. /3
The report concluded:
"Israel’s efforts were entirely necessary and justified in the defence of that country’s national security. Israel’s conduct in the 2014 Gaza Conflict met and in some respects exceeded the highest standards we set for our own nations’ militaries."