Tom Bonier Profile picture
Oct 21 14 tweets 3 min read Read on X
I'm hoping to have the time to write something longer/more detailed on the early vote in the battlegrounds in the next day or two. But for now, a brief thread explaining why I think a lot of the EV analyses are getting it wrong, and how complex this all is this year.
I'm going to use NC as the example, but we could really use any state and find generally the same thing.
Taken at a high level, the early vote data in NC would appear to be very good for the GOP. At this point in 2020 the EV was +22 Dem, and right now it is +1 D. But let's talk about why it's a lot more complicated than that. Image
A national NBC poll last week showed that about half of voters plan to cast an early vote this year. That's a big number, but still down substantially from the almost two-thirds of voters who cast an early vote in 2020 in the midst of the pandemic.
Assuming turnout roughly even with 2020 (about 160MM votes cast nationwide) this means that there will be about 26 million fewer early votes cast this year, relative to 2020.
But here's the thing, it's not as simple as thinking that voting method conversions will be entirely from early to election day. The GOP acknowledged that they made a tactical error in shunning early voting in 2020 and have invested heavily in getting their voters out early.
So realistically this means that you will see massive numbers of Democrats converting from early to Election Day, and massive numbers of Republicans doing the opposite, in order to land at the numbers cited upthread, about half of ballots cast before Election Day.
Leaving NC for a second, PA is a great example of this. A whopping 40% of registered GOP early voters (this is mail in PA) voted on Election Day in 2020, as compared to only 11% of registered Dem early voters.
Back to NC. So the GOP appears to be doing much better in the early vote... because they are. But is that a sign of great intensity for the GOP? It is almost impossible to say.
The graphic upthread showed party reg shares of early votes cast in NC so far. But this one shows turnout as a percent of all registered voters in each group, and perhaps paints a clearer picture. Image
Here we can see that turnout is down, relative to this point in 2020 among all parties. But the GOP is much closer to their 2020 turnout than Dems. Which is entirely consistent with what one would expect, based on everything I've noted in this thread.
So what does this mean for early vote analysis? It means that something that was already difficult before the massive vote mode shifts we're seeing happening this year will be exponentially more difficult. Which means we will see exponentially more bad analyses. Buyer beware.
Again, I hope to write more on this, but my general approach to looking at the early vote this year is to stay in this context of expected vote mode shifting - so when the early vote looks close to 2020 (or better) for Dems, that is a very good sign for Dems.
But to be clear, when it looks worse for Dems (like NC), we are left with the question of how much worse is problematic for Dems/a good sign of intensity for GOPs. And no one can answer that question. Sorry. It's just relative, where we can compare states on the same yardstick.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tom Bonier

Tom Bonier Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tbonier

Oct 22
I've gotten a lot of questions about what I think about the NV early vote, so here's a quick thread. From a party share of the EV, there has obviously been a substantial gap closing relative to 2020, where at this point it was +16D, and right now it is +2D. Image
Of course, while I wouldn't compare raw numbers in a presidential to a midterm, it is worth pointing out that, at this point in 2022 the EV in NV was just +3D, and things turned out fine for Dems then.
Also, let's remember that the final Dem advantage (party reg, not vote) among all EV in NV in 2020 was +3. In 2022 it was +1.5. So Dems started off huge (with lots of mail) in 2020, but things settled back down to a narrow advantage. Meaning, let's keep watching this. Image
Read 5 tweets
Oct 15
This week marks the point where I believe we will have enough early voting data in key states to begin to talk about what we're seeing with more regularity, so I wanted to share some thoughts about what we can and cannot do with this dataset.
1) Early voting data will not tell us who is going to win. Just like a poll won't either. It provides important context. The right way to do this is to use EV data to inform polls and vice versa.
2) Just because one side or the other has more of their people voting early doesn't mean that they are winning that state. This should be obvious, but this gets missed sometimes, it seems.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 15
Some MI mail/early voting stats:

The gender gap (women +11.9) is currently bigger than the gap was at this point in 2020 and 2022. Image
A lot of that is being driven by huge turnout from Black women. Black voters overall are accounting for a substantially larger share of the votes cast thus far, relative to the same point in '20 or '22. Image
To quantify that further, overall early turnout in MI is at 55% of where it was at this point in 2020 (which was expected, many voters will shift back to Eday), yet Black women turnout is at 77% of 2020 levels.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 11
Okay, we're finally getting to the point where there is enough early vote in several key states to begin to watch for emerging trends. So I'll kick off my first early vote thread of 2024 with a look at Pennsylvania.
One quick note before we begin - for the sake of brevity I will generally refer to all ballots cast before election day as "early votes", regardless of how they were cast (mail, early in person, etc). I may talk about mode from time to time, but generally just combine them all.
If you look at the vote reported in PA so far, Dems have a solid advantage in terms of party registration, though the gap is smaller than it was in 2020 at this same point, but that doesn't tell the whole story. More on that in a moment. Image
Read 11 tweets
Oct 10
Reupping this from last night ICYMI. I hope you'll click through to the substack post, but here are some key points:
Looking at the Quinnipiac polls yesterday, they are based on likely voter models that assume GOPs will have more intensity and therefore higher turnout. Clearly, that is one key to Trump's path to victory, along with Dems (esp younger) being demobilized.
Speaking of younger voters, Republicans have created an echo chamber that many young (mostly white) men have immersed themselves on, mostly on youtube, as they consume content from people like Joe Rogan and Andrew Tate.
Read 5 tweets
Sep 26
So this is going to be super in the weeds, but I will keep it relatively short. I think this will be key to understanding/analyzing the early vote this year. And explains how I think the GOP will use early vote data to falsely claim that they are winning/have momentum.
First, remember that one key element of early vote analysis is comparing to prior cycles. While there is a tactical advantage for the party that can bank more votes early, that by itself isn't indicative of a turnout/enthusiasm advantage.
For that reason, we like to compare the early vote to the same point in prior cycles. Absent anything unusual (and there is something unusual we have to deal with this cycle), if one party has a larger share of the early vote turnout relative to '20, that is a good sign for them.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(