A trailer for SOP released today that names many contributors to the project. Among them are many egalitarians (like Du Mez and Barr), slanderers of the brethren (Moore), proponents of CRT (Anyabwile), and various confessional P&R ministers. (2/10)
My question is Paul’s from 2 Corinthians 6:14: “What fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness? And what communion has light with darkness?” (3/10)
The cause of anti-Wilson is not so righteous that it justifies sin and doctrinal compromise along the way. The truth will not be vindicated by mixing it with falsehood. The sheep will not be protected by confusing them, misleading them, or exposing them to false teaching. (4/10)
What kind of sin and compromise am I talking about? Here is SOP (presumably Bell) promoting what is a direct attack on biblical and Reformed church discipline, which demands that accusations of sin be proven in church courts (which necessarily consist of qualified male elders). (5/10)
These folks can’t be confessional and Reformed while promoting ecclesiastical anarchy. Discipline is the third mark of the true church, and a core biblical and confessional doctrine (see Matt 18, 1 Cor 5-6, Belgic 29-32, WCF 24 and 30, the various BCOs and member vows) (6/10)
In a related development, Nick from Bell's former podcast Guilt Grace Gratitude (sort of) responded to me on Saturday, claiming that GGG has nothing to do with Bell or anything else related to this matter. (7/10)
I appreciate hearing from him on this. The problem is that Bell (both in May and now) has claimed that Nick was the one responsible for GGG representing Bell as a pastor, and also that Danny Hyde and OURC had his credentials. (8/10)
Either GGG was/is involved, or Bell is not telling the truth, but both cannot be true. So far there has been no further clarification from Bell or GGG. It would be nice to clear this up. (9/10)
In summary, we have more problems and questions now than we started with. SOP seems to be speeding towards release with no brakes but we still don't know the truth and men who should know better and could do something don't appear to be taking action. (10/10)
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm going to do a living thread of various Reformed and Reformed-adjacent ministries that took federal COVID bailout money through the Paycheck Protection Plan.
I did a piece on Reformed seminaries doing this about a year ago. Rather than duplicate those efforts, here you go. 1/onceforalldelivered.com/publish/posts/…
The Gospel Coalition took funds two times, totaling just under $800K. No big surprise there. 2/
By the way, current participants in federal loan programs certify compliance with Title IX, which has been interpreted by the current Department of Education thusly: ed.gov/news/press-rel…
I'm not sure this is the last speaker I would pick for a rural ministry conference but he'd definitely fall below the "if these are my options, I'm not having a rural ministry conference" threshold.
Anyone within a 39 1/2 foot pole's reach of TGC probably isn't going to resonate with rural congregants, as TGC and related entities have been champions for the vision and goals of The City ™️, often at the expense of diverting attention and resources away from rural churches.
Allberry's writings and ideas have helped to fuel a lot of confusion over homosexuality in the church, by making murky what has bibically and historically been quite clear. For more on that, see @ShawnMathis1972 's review: pastormathis.com/index.php/2021…
Maybe for a time I needed to, there was a lot of the baggage of legalism and vain tradition in my belief and practice. But after a while, what ended up happening was that I found myself believing and running cover for many of the wicked ideologies of our age, while thinking...
...that everything was fine because I had the gospel. Then I aged and I experienced more and more firsthand how the world was and saw more and more "gospel-centered" folk compromising more and more with the world and looking more and more like the world.
This quote from my alma mater is from Covenant Theology Under Attack--an article that was released (heavily edited in ways Kline disapproved) in New Horizons, the OPC's magazine.
In that article, Kline gives a succinct description of his own ideas of merit and simple justice. A key contention for Kline is that Adam must have been able to do properly meritorious works in the garden, or else Christ as the second Adam could not merit our salvation. (2/13)
He actually reasons from the latter to the former--if Christ could merit eternal salvation for His people as second Adam, then Adam could have merited eternal salvation as well. (3/13)