The main distinction between slow COVID and long COVID is that long COVID is clearly associated with debilitating symptoms from the outset. Slow COVID may be more insidious, with organ or immune or cognitive or other function declining gradually over time.
Again, slow COVID could happen as a result of damage from the initial infection that takes time to manifest, through cumulative damage from repeated infections, and/or persistent infection.
We're still working through the ideas and how to model and test the hypothesis. But let's just say, every time I see a study (of which there seems to be a steady flood) that shows organ damage, I think about the potential risk of "slow COVID".
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Case in point about denialism, when I post this kind of thing , they'll screenshot and go on a rant about how I don't understand stuff. (Ironically, they demonstrate both poor reading comprehension and a lack of understanding of humour).
Here's the full pandemic picture based on wastewater surveillance in Canada. A few things of note (most of which I have discussed previously several times): 🧵
1. The story isn't just about peaks, it's about the lack of lows. At best, there have been six periods of lower activity, but really there have only been two decent lulls that were not still at a fairly high baseline and weren't immediately followed by another peak.
2. The last Greek letter was given in November 2021. "Omicron" variants are **far** more diverse and divergent than any of the others that received Greek letters, yet not even the ones requiring updates to vaccines (XBB.1.5, JN.1/KP.2) were named.
The minimizer position is committed to every one of these assumptions being true. The cautious position is the right one if even one of them is false. 🧵
Required assumptions:
1. Immunity against severe illness will be long-lasting or can be maintained at low risk (vaccination or truly mild infection).
2. Most people are not at risk of long COVID.
3. There is no cumulative damage or risk associated with repeated infection.
Required assumptions:
4. Replication-competent virus does not persist in different tissues except in very rare circumstances and/or does no damage to organs in which it occurs.
5. Wastewater is a signal mostly of asymptomatic, or at most mild, short-lived infection.
As we head into the new school year and then into winter, a reminder about these articles focused on actually doing something to keep our kids and other loved ones healthy. 🧵
August 2024.
"Protecting HCWs and patients: An impossible fix, or an essential one?"
If anyone says "It's all still Omicron", "The current variants aren't that different", "SARS-CoV-2 is running out of evolutionary space", or "The current wave is finally over!", show them these. 🧵
For my reporter friends who are still writing about SARS-CoV-2 variants (thank you!), here are some notes that I hope are helpful.
🧵
* Pretty much everything circulating right now is a descendant of BA.2.86 (Pirola), which was a highly divergent variant that evolved within a single, chronically-infected host.
* BA.2.86 was descended directly from BA.2 and had about 30 new spike mutations.
* BA.2.86 itself was not very successful. What we said at the time was that its descendants would be the real issue.
* JN.1 (aka BA.2.86.1.1) had one additional spike mutation and was successful. Pretty much everything around now is a descendant of JN.1.