My mom just told me she cancelled her subscription to The Washington Post. She reads every one of my stories. It was a heartbreaking call.
I understand why she did it, but I asked her to reconsider. To anyone who has cancelled or is thinking about cancelling, here’s what I said:
Post reporters had no part in this decision. But when you cancel, you are hurting us, not our owner.
I feel lucky to work at a place that doesn’t blink when I say I need to fly to Texas to meet a woman whose life has been changed by an abortion ban. To document the impacts of Dobbs up close. I can only do that if we have subscribers who support us.
Reporters in the Post newsroom will continue to do our jobs. We will report fearlessly on whoever becomes president, and so many other things that really matter, because we are independent and care deeply about holding the powerful to account.
I completely understand if you’ve lost faith in our owner, but please, don’t lose faith in us.
We have so much work to do.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thousands of women every month are now self-managing their abortions with pills in states with bans. For some, the process is straightforward. But for many others, it's confusing and very scary — especially for those who assume they could be prosecuted. 🧵washingtonpost.com/politics/inter…
This is a story I’ve wanted to write for a long time, capturing the experiences of women who — while extremely grateful to have access to pills — feel afraid and alone.
These women bravely shared their experiences for the same reason: They wanted others to know what to expect 2/
(Important context: People seeking abortions can’t be prosecuted under abortion bans, but almost none of the women I interviewed understood that. Also, women have been prosecuted for self-managing under other laws) 3/
NEW: Highways are the next antiabortion target. Activists are traveling from city to city in TX to pass new laws that make it illegal to transport anyone to get an abortion out of state on roads within the city or county limits.
The activists are targeting regions along interstates and in areas with airports, with the goal of blocking off the main arteries out of Texas and keeping pregnant women hemmed within the confines of their antiabortion state.
These provisions have already passed in two counties and two cities, creating legal risk for those traveling on major highways that head toward New Mexico. Several more jurisdictions are expected to vote on the measure in the coming weeks.
NEW: Researchers at UCSF have released a first-of-its-kind report documenting dozens of health complications resulting from abortion bans, including patients turned away with cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/…
Since Dobbs, we’ve seen a lot of isolated reports of patients turned away from hospitals because of abortion bans. This report is an important effort to take a broader and deeper look at what’s happening. From @DrDGrossman and his team.
The study was conducted by UCSF’s Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health and the Texas Policy Evaluation Project at the University of Texas at Austin
It’s been the honor of a lifetime to earn the trust of women navigating post-Roe America. Thank you, Pulitzer board, for recognizing the importance of their stories. It means the world to me, and to them. pulitzer.org/winners/caroli…
This work was a true collaboration with my wonderful editor, @peterwallsten. The product of hundreds of hours of conversations about the reporting and pouring over drafts. I am so lucky to have him as a partner in this coverage.
I also want to thank the other reporters covering abortion. @shefalil@rmc031@eklib and many others. Your hard work and dedication to this issue pushed me to keep going when I had very little gas left in the tank. Proud to be on this beat with all of you.
Reporting this morning from Raleigh, where NC lawmakers are about to start a hearing on the 12-week abortion ban. This bill is being rushed through in a way longtime advocates in Raleigh say they’ve never seen before. Here’s what we know so far 🧵
Instead of introducing this as a new bill in the regular way, Republicans gutted a different, unrelated piece of legislation on a safe surrender law and inserted the 46-page abortion bill.
They added it as a conference committee report, which allows them to bypass the traditional committee process and go right to a vote. The House is expected to vote this afternoon and the senate is expected to vote tomorrow.
Breaking: The DOJ has appealed the abortion pills case, asking the Supreme Court to intervene. It's a very tight timeline -- if SCOTUS doesn't act before midnight tonight, strict restrictions on mifepristone will take effect across the country.
Background: The Fifth Circuit has temporarily blocked the part of Kacsmaryk's order that withdraws FDA approval for the drug outright -- so that won't happen. But they are allowing tight restrictions on the drug to come back, including in-person distribution requirements.