Some will think this communique is harmless. It’s not. As I saw at G7, G20 and WTO meetings, they are used for policy making at multi-lateral organisations and we will pay for this work to be done. There are two likely reasons why this has been signed🧵👇
Those who criticised Labour’s student politics were accused of “culture wars”.
The truth is there’s no division between social and economic debates. You have to fight and win both at the same time.
If you don't understand the link between the two, then you will lose twice.
Labour has no mandate to promise the money of British taxpayers, who have never condoned or practised slavery, to foreign governments on the basis of inherited guilt.
As we saw with their handling of the Chagos islands, they don’t know how to defend our national interests.
It’s going to be a bad five years.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵1/ It is not true that the removal of Israel arms licenses was a legal decision. Keir Starmer should not hide behind this fig leaf. It was *very* much a political decision. #PMQs
I know this, because as Trade Secretary, responsible for arms licenses, I saw the legal advice. So why has the decision been made? It’s because Labour are scared…👇
2/ People will remember in February when a vote in parliament was compromised by Labour MPs who were intimidated by the anti-Israel lobby.
We are now governed by a party that is not brave enough to face down intimidation and lobbying.theguardian.com/politics/2024/…
3/ This year, I made a considered decision to maintain all existing licences for arms exports to Israel. Union-backed civil servants threatened to stop work and go on strike.
My response was not to make concessions but to make it clear that they were there to deliver the government’s agenda. Not their own.
It's both amusing/alarming the extraordinary lengths people will go to play dirty tricks.
3 things happened today that show why the public are put off politics:
1) Apparently, a leadership campaign has sent a "dirty dossier" of “strong comments” from 20 yrs ago to the Westminster lobby👇(1/4)
2) A political journalist at the Guardian has been texting officials in my former department to find someone/anyone willing to make bullying accusations about me. One of them said her message was effectively encouraging them to break the civil service code….. (2/4)
3) Someone registered a Kemi 4 Leader website (nope, nothing to do with me). I’d never run a site with such obvious errors eg using expensive proprietary images without paying for their use.
This has been sent round to journos with dishonest claims that it is my campaign website running in maintenance mode...(3/4)
The plan I announced today to clarify biological sex in law has attracted a lot of comment. Including, of course, vitriol from the usual suspects who toxify the debate!
My Times piece explains the policy and shows the area is complex -the media interviewing me were by their own admission confused about it all, so I answer key questions below (1/5)
1️⃣ Why now?
We’ve been working on this for nearly 2 years. It was part of a package of proposals I discussed with the PM, almost all of which are done.
This legislation was ready for Sept, but we had to wait for a few things first, such as the court case with the SNP govt (2/5)
2️⃣ Isn’t this just “culture wars” for right-wing voters?
No. It’s the right thing to do. The people most keen on this policy tend to be women’s rights campaigners -largely on the left. This should not be a party-political issue. Just common sense re-stating the law as it was intended (3/5)
Every week, I get cards and letters like this, reminding me why we must defend single-sex spaces from those who seek to delegitimise or redefine them.
Reading it was both moving and profoundly distressing, but I felt compelled to share it after catching up on the news of Roz Adams’s tribunal case... (1/4)
As Ms Adams found, there are many tactics used to silence those who point out that something is going wrong including: 1) Ad hominem smears attacking the whistleblower as eg “transphobic” or “far-right“ 2) Use of probability fallacies “I’ve never experienced this so it can’t be true” or “This is unlikely to happen, so why worry about it”….(2/4)
3) Attempting to demean those in authority who have concerns as “culture warriors”. Or claiming politicians should stick to talking about the economy and the NHS
4) Redefining the issue to cause confusion. Eg pretending the govt is banning unisex and disabled toilets rather than the “gender-neutral” mixed sex bathrooms such as the ones pictured….(3/4)
The workplace is becoming more politicised and less harmonious.
There has been a sharp uptick in the number of cases brought to the Employment Tribunal using the Equality Act, as disputes once resolved quickly and calmly in the workplace are increasingly taken to court…2/7
This is happening despite and in some cases (eg Forstater vs CGD Europe) because of company policies.
I get asked repeatedly why the govt doesn’t just ban bad training. We did.
In fact, I tried this in 2020 when we banned unconscious bias training in the civil service…3/7