owen cyclops Profile picture
Oct 29, 2024 24 tweets 11 min read Read on X
'the nightmare before christmas' was released 31 years ago today.

a strange film: after three decades, its still a feature of the cultural landscape (year round), you see its imagery often - it clearly has a special relationship to us.

this year, i tried to figure out why

... Image
some people seem to instinctually take on this movie as part of their personality. i remember going to a girl's room once and she had a nightmare before christmas blanket. "yeah, that makes sense". people wear shirts of it, bumper stickers - all year, not just at either holiday. Image
this is noteworthy because it's a holiday film that transcends the holidays. this is usually the opposite of what holiday movies do. they're usually especially confined to their seasonal domain. someone wouldn't really wear christmas movie gear in spring, as a general rule. Image
its also noteworthy that this movie seems to lack an obvious folkloric / mythical / archetypal resonance. im sure we could shoehorn something in, but it doesn't fit an obvious pattern or precedence, to me. that just makes the above facts, it's archetypal resonance, even stranger Image
II. on what is called "spooky", and magic.

spooky can mean many things. something that reveals a hidden other world is spooky. the place jack is from, halloween town, is not that type of spooky. they live in this realm, it is not an "other world" to them. Image
the spookiness here, which is native to jack - which is, really, his entire world and paradigm - is that of the bizarre, disturbing, or inverted. it is the aesthetic of spookiness. we could call this creepy: his world is obsessed with the dark and bizarre for its own sake. Image
enter: christmas. he experiences many aspects of christmas, all from the perspective of an outsider. his christmas experience is parsed as, "wow, amazing, what is this?" (the main song is called 'what's this?'). he's completely charmed and entranced, but its essence eludes him. Image
his experience of christmas is self-described as the feeling of missing some hidden core: the thing that really makes it what it is. the whole point of it. that's the main theme: here's the lights, here are the bells, he even boils an ornament in his lab. he has all the stuff. Image
but the stuff isnt the answer for "what is christmas?". he correctly intuits that the stuff is superfluous. he's on the surface level. he knows he is clearly missing the thing christmas is really about. he cannot see or grasp the thing at the core that makes christmas what it is Image
III. secular

my posit is that the reason this movie has an instinctual resonance in our culture is because jack's experience is the experience of the modern person, here explicated as their experience of the holidays.

this is what christmas is like for the modern secular child Image
we (especially children) are native to a world that is just kind of creepy and dark - then our culture chooses to focus on those things and highlight them. we also present a lot of it to children

to extend the metaphor, halloween is very creepy and dark. its also a kids holiday Image
then, you see christmas, and it's the total opposite of this. nice, warm, love, light, inviting - everyone loves christmas, just like jack. it's intoxicatingly beautiful. you love christmas.

the modern secular child or adult loves christmas. it's most people's favorite holiday. Image
these modern secular people can participate in christmas in a variety of ways, but, like jack, they are totally locked out of its core: being a modern secular person literally precludes you from fully being a part of what christmas is actually about. Image
notably: jack never figures it out - because he can't. its precluded from his universe. he is correct in his assessment, 100%: the magic of christmas is not about any of the things he sees or participates in or obtains

its all downstream of something he never even gets close to Image
IV. so, what is christmas?

christmas is, literally, a celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ. to even point this out feels like proselytization - but that is simply a matter of actual fact. paradoxically, this is both comically obvious and totally obscured in modern christmas Image
jack never gets this information, his his issue is real. "what is this magical enchanting thing really about? i feel that i'm only on the surface level". that is true. the lights, gifts, decor, and so on, are all literally about celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ. Image
this is a perfect analogy for a secular child's experience of christmas. theres this magic space, i want to inhabit it. but its not "of you". its other. its not your world. you don't actually believe in the thing that, at the core, is what it's all about. you are not part of it Image
jack is from halloween world. that's who he is. so, when he participates in christmas, he makes it like halloween. that's the whole movie.

that's the modern secular person. you can see the stuff in this other realm, and the stuff in it is so cool and magical. you really love it Image
but the core of it, the thing that makes it what it is, is antithetical to you. so, when you try to participate in it, you make it more secular. you make it more like your world - when what drew you to it in the first place is that it's the opposite of your world. you are jack. Image
and thats what happens in the movie. this is why people instinctually resonate with this tale. this is the modern secular person's experience of christmas, especially children

you could also extend this out to other phenomena that have their origin in religion

thats it. thanks Image
my manager said if i spent the time writing this i have to plug my [general operation]

book in pinned tweet. comics in highlights tab. ad for the lab below (posted notes for this there last week).

bonus pic: thats me last year (pumpkin vibes) Image
Image
second footnote: speaking of children’s media, here’s a thread we did recently of children’s book recommendations (featuring real pumpkin)
i am glad people responded to this post. very cool

if you liked this you may enjoy some of my other stuff, for example: a comics anthology about the intersection of having a baby and religious philosophy, or my first kid's book, below:

happy halloween.

Image
Image
Image
Image
going to add this at the end here: a pastor / author drew a similar conclusion as me (independent of me, posted before). he wrote a more in depth article on substack, and a thread in his pinned tweet tying it into ‘a secular age’ by charles taylor, if you want to check it out: Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with owen cyclops

owen cyclops Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @owenbroadcast

Mar 29
it looks like the AI conversation is going to cement around “are artists are coping or not” but id like to submit a second option: that its worthy of skepticism that my broke friends are beholden to copyright laws that apparently don’t apply to tech people making a lot of money
the AI question really should be: are we doing wild west on copyright laws or not. if we are, okay - then that should apply to everyone. if we’re not - okay, then that should apply to everyone. everyone is basically arguing that now tech companies get to be the exception to them.
if my friends can get cease and desist letters for making fanart about a movie or franchise when money gets involved but a guy can also make a billion dollars feeding that movie and franchise into his image maker and selling access to it, i dont think its out of line to ask: what
Read 5 tweets
Mar 27
one key aspect of postmodernism is that art styles are self-consciously deployed as pastiche. this means theyre just used as surface, for what they represent: they become interchangeable. these almost meaningless academic concepts will increasingly characterize your everyday life
when an entire artistic milieu is used just for what it represents, not what it actually is (this already happened a long time ago), the blowback is that it becomes impossible to genuinely use and engage with those milieus. you can’t decide to not be self aware of this process.
this is, in my opinion, the actual origin of what is called “stuck culture”. to start a “nu-metal” band would be referencing what “nu-metal” is. you and the audience would both know that you’re aware of this. that awareness is the source of the “block” - everything is self aware.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 13
the 'people not having kids' trend: fascinating. people can do whatever. but as a larger trend, clearly something is up. likewise, when i ask the older generation why they all had kids, they don't know. they "just did"

so i looked up why non-human animals might not breed

[...] Image
one fascination i have with this topic is that it seems to be instinctual, thus the turn to animals. in my parents friend group, they all had kids around the same time. i (probably too much) grilled them about why they all did this and they all gave some version of "we just did"
that's "just what you did". okay. as though compelled by something beyond them. not religious, running the spectrum of affluence, no clear answer. likewise, despite the internet obsession with this, there's no clear answer. internet? maybe. politics? maybe. nothing great, imo. Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 9
‘what does the fox sign?’
(meta-animals in children’s literature)

animals seem to have an inherent symbolic content: winged birds have always been related to the spirit, we call someone “a rat” or “a pig”, or as in the intuitive relationship between lions and being a king.

[…] Image
this is one level of symbolism: what does each animal mean? we can also climb up to a higher question: what do “animals” mean, as a class? how do we perceive and depict “animal”-ness? one case study of this is in an art and literature intersection often overlooked: kid’s books. Image
conveniently we have two artists we can compare whose careers begin almost exactly fifty years apart: beatrix potter, whose career starts right around 1900 (in art, this would be ‘modern’), and richard scarry, whose career starts right around 1950 (in art, this is ‘contemporary’) Image
Image
Read 22 tweets
Feb 16
here's a book called richard scarry's busy busy world. i find this book extremely interesting from a pedagogical perspective.

our culture has taken the position of having an extreme aversion to stereotypes. well, that's all this book is: the stereotypes of each country.

[...] Image
the story in france has people in fancy restaurants. the story in switzerland has goats climbing mountains. the story in mexico has a guy eating beans and buying clay pots. the story in india has a fortune teller. and so on. the entire content is just basic stereotypes. Image
Image
Image
Image
i don't think you could do this with a major publisher today. it would read as educationally irresponsible, in a sense.

but, this book has allowed me and owen jr. to discuss other countries. he has a conception of holland, and talks about it, because of this book. Image
Read 7 tweets
Feb 14
what is the nature of the self in christian eschatology?

for those unfamiliar, eschatology is a branch of theology that just means, "how everything ends up". the final state of things. end of the story. how does this all play out? how the pieces land: that's eschatology.

[...] Image
in the eastern system i'm the most familiar with, buddhism, there's a concept called shunyata. usually translated as emptiness - it means things are empty of inherent existence. like a sweater: you can see the sweater, but if you keep pulling threads off, you never get "it". Image
the self in buddhism, in my experience, is like this. it's a momentary aggregate of interdependent factors. its like a ball of things that only has provisional existence. it's there, but it's not eternal, like a ball of twine that just happens to be stuck together right now. Image
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(