'the nightmare before christmas' was released 31 years ago today.
a strange film: after three decades, its still a feature of the cultural landscape (year round), you see its imagery often - it clearly has a special relationship to us.
this year, i tried to figure out why
...
some people seem to instinctually take on this movie as part of their personality. i remember going to a girl's room once and she had a nightmare before christmas blanket. "yeah, that makes sense". people wear shirts of it, bumper stickers - all year, not just at either holiday.
this is noteworthy because it's a holiday film that transcends the holidays. this is usually the opposite of what holiday movies do. they're usually especially confined to their seasonal domain. someone wouldn't really wear christmas movie gear in spring, as a general rule.
its also noteworthy that this movie seems to lack an obvious folkloric / mythical / archetypal resonance. im sure we could shoehorn something in, but it doesn't fit an obvious pattern or precedence, to me. that just makes the above facts, it's archetypal resonance, even stranger
II. on what is called "spooky", and magic.
spooky can mean many things. something that reveals a hidden other world is spooky. the place jack is from, halloween town, is not that type of spooky. they live in this realm, it is not an "other world" to them.
the spookiness here, which is native to jack - which is, really, his entire world and paradigm - is that of the bizarre, disturbing, or inverted. it is the aesthetic of spookiness. we could call this creepy: his world is obsessed with the dark and bizarre for its own sake.
enter: christmas. he experiences many aspects of christmas, all from the perspective of an outsider. his christmas experience is parsed as, "wow, amazing, what is this?" (the main song is called 'what's this?'). he's completely charmed and entranced, but its essence eludes him.
his experience of christmas is self-described as the feeling of missing some hidden core: the thing that really makes it what it is. the whole point of it. that's the main theme: here's the lights, here are the bells, he even boils an ornament in his lab. he has all the stuff.
but the stuff isnt the answer for "what is christmas?". he correctly intuits that the stuff is superfluous. he's on the surface level. he knows he is clearly missing the thing christmas is really about. he cannot see or grasp the thing at the core that makes christmas what it is
III. secular
my posit is that the reason this movie has an instinctual resonance in our culture is because jack's experience is the experience of the modern person, here explicated as their experience of the holidays.
this is what christmas is like for the modern secular child
we (especially children) are native to a world that is just kind of creepy and dark - then our culture chooses to focus on those things and highlight them. we also present a lot of it to children
to extend the metaphor, halloween is very creepy and dark. its also a kids holiday
then, you see christmas, and it's the total opposite of this. nice, warm, love, light, inviting - everyone loves christmas, just like jack. it's intoxicatingly beautiful. you love christmas.
the modern secular child or adult loves christmas. it's most people's favorite holiday.
these modern secular people can participate in christmas in a variety of ways, but, like jack, they are totally locked out of its core: being a modern secular person literally precludes you from fully being a part of what christmas is actually about.
notably: jack never figures it out - because he can't. its precluded from his universe. he is correct in his assessment, 100%: the magic of christmas is not about any of the things he sees or participates in or obtains
its all downstream of something he never even gets close to
IV. so, what is christmas?
christmas is, literally, a celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ. to even point this out feels like proselytization - but that is simply a matter of actual fact. paradoxically, this is both comically obvious and totally obscured in modern christmas
jack never gets this information, his his issue is real. "what is this magical enchanting thing really about? i feel that i'm only on the surface level". that is true. the lights, gifts, decor, and so on, are all literally about celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ.
this is a perfect analogy for a secular child's experience of christmas. theres this magic space, i want to inhabit it. but its not "of you". its other. its not your world. you don't actually believe in the thing that, at the core, is what it's all about. you are not part of it
jack is from halloween world. that's who he is. so, when he participates in christmas, he makes it like halloween. that's the whole movie.
that's the modern secular person. you can see the stuff in this other realm, and the stuff in it is so cool and magical. you really love it
but the core of it, the thing that makes it what it is, is antithetical to you. so, when you try to participate in it, you make it more secular. you make it more like your world - when what drew you to it in the first place is that it's the opposite of your world. you are jack.
and thats what happens in the movie. this is why people instinctually resonate with this tale. this is the modern secular person's experience of christmas, especially children
you could also extend this out to other phenomena that have their origin in religion
thats it. thanks
my manager said if i spent the time writing this i have to plug my [general operation]
book in pinned tweet. comics in highlights tab. ad for the lab below (posted notes for this there last week).
bonus pic: thats me last year (pumpkin vibes)
second footnote: speaking of children’s media, here’s a thread we did recently of children’s book recommendations (featuring real pumpkin)
i am glad people responded to this post. very cool
if you liked this you may enjoy some of my other stuff, for example: a comics anthology about the intersection of having a baby and religious philosophy, or my first kid's book, below:
going to add this at the end here: a pastor / author drew a similar conclusion as me (independent of me, posted before). he wrote a more in depth article on substack, and a thread in his pinned tweet tying it into ‘a secular age’ by charles taylor, if you want to check it out:
american halloween theology: the philosophical mythology of insane clown posse
folk religion generally defies strict boundaries. it is, by definition, often fully enmeshed with aspects of a cultural landscape.
it is in this spirit that we briefly look at the insane clown posse.
the insane clown posse was originally known as the inner city posse, and made music far more aligned with the typical themes of rap and hip hop. based in detriot, they realized that pursuing this path would just lump them in with east and west coast artists, hindering them.
it is worth noting that detroit is, obviously, not a neutral place. in the american mind, detroit stands as a former manufacturing el dorado, which died, succumbing to various forces, and leaving a shell of itself behind. this may or may not be true, but thats part of its mythos.
saw this when i was 12 or 13 for some reason and it affected a huge portion of my life. a trojan horse: it appeals to people who have a crappy job and feel like they’re better than the customers, and then asks: if you’re so smart, why are you the one working there? brutal.
i had a ton of “lame jobs”. its something i enjoy, in a sense, for a time. if it was 1994 i probably could have been content just working the exact position documented in the film - a clerk. sadly they broke the social contract and put cameras into every workplace like this.
this ended the ability to do anything other than work, which was the whole point of having such a job.
thats really the point of the movie. both main characters feel like theyre better than the public, but only one uses his low station to his advantage: by freedom-maxxing.
oh yes. it is time for… our second annual children’s book recommendation thread.
the last one changed amazon’s suggested products list forever. such power we wield.
we take childhood reading very seriously here. allow me to send you some book ideas from the cyclops family hut.
the last recommendations thread was done around our first kid’s book release. that thread is below.
we have another kid’s book dropping before the holidays - presently, the main thing we are pumping is that i have all my books together as a package now. scope-able on my profile:
last intro note: premise. a normal person might describe my wife as a “crunchy mom”. her vibe is in the mix here. books clearly affect a kid’s spirit and psyche so we tend towards things we feel will nurture the brain-spirit in some way. basically, we are the bottom of this meme:
apathy about other people that you come into contact with is really a form of contempt. if you dont care what a person thinks, you obviously dont think very highly of them.
i have this. its the best and worst feature of my personality. recently, i tried to figure out why.
[…]
in some ways, its served me very well. it allowed me to get through basically anything as an artist. if you go down the “whole path”, inevitably you get some harsh critiques or insults. if you don’t care what other people think, you’re just immune. it doesn’t affect you - at all.
on the flip side, the slight contempt for normal people (you see this online here, “normies”) or others in general is caustic. its rarely articulated - you never say it or consciously think it, you may not even notice it, but it forms the subtext for your social interactions.
i’d like to discuss christian and mormon orientations toward knowledge.
for a variety of reasons, mormon theology has been a large topic on X recently. this is one of my main areas of interest, but its difficult to briefly hop into.
so, i really enjoyed reading perelandra:
perelandra is the second book in the space trilogy by c.s. lewis. obviously there will be some spoilers in here.
in the book, there’s a few characters that are obviously proxies: a woman is eve, one figure is the devil. the narrator is obviously, to me, a stand in for the author
ransom, the narrator, who i just read as lewis himself, finds himself in an analogy for the garden of eden. he is observing the devil slowly tempt eve, basically. he’s able to get involved and argue a little bit but, he has to sleep, the devil doesnt - he cant stop the process.
parenting has this odd social dimension where youre always actively engaging with how other people see you.
so i go to this street fair. my son (3) gets stung by a wasp. never been stung before. freaks out. i take him out of the crowd and put him on some grass. he’s fine.
[…]
i also just so happened to have obtained an extremely large gyro seconds before this. in my haste and preference for my own flesh and blood, i abandoned the gyro.
when my son is injured, he just wants things to be normal. he personally insists i go back and re-obtain the gyro.
he doesnt want to talk about being injured, doesnt want any attention, he just wants everything to stay normal and not orbit around him so he can deal with it. great. so he wants me, his dad, eating his food like normal, on this patch of grass while he recovers from a wasp sting.