HOW THE FBI “PREBUNKED” A TRUE STORY ABOUT THE BIDEN FAMILY’S CORRUPTION BEFORE THE 2020 ELECTION
The FBI knew Hunter Biden’s laptop was real & worked for MONTHS to prime Big Tech to censor the @nypost story.
Here’s how the FBI "prebunked" the biggest story of the election.
🧵
In late 2019, the FBI obtained and secretly confirmed that the Hunter Biden laptop was real.
The laptop had damning material showing the Biden family’s corrupt influence-peddling scheme.
Just a few months later, while in possession of Hunter’s laptop, the FBI started meeting with Big Tech to warn about potential Russian disinformation ahead of the election.
In total, the FBI and Big Tech met over 30 times in 2020 before the Biden family corruption story came out.
FBI warned Big Tech to watch for:
WHO: Russians.
WHAT: Hack-and-Leak operation.
WHEN: October surprise.
WHY: To reveal “links between the Biden family and Ukraine, including Burisma.”
Internal Facebook emails a MONTH before @nypost story came out show Big Tech got specific warnings:
The FBI spent months establishing the who, what, when, & why behind a potential foreign hack-and-leak operation.
And it just so happened to match the damning contents about Biden family corruption on Hunter Biden’s laptop—which the FBI had since late 2019.
Quite the coincidence!
But it wasn’t a coincidence.
@JudiciaryGOP & @Weaponization obtained testimony from key FBI witnesses that the FBI officials who knew the FBI had Hunter Biden’s laptop were the same ones meeting with Big Tech when Big Tech was warned of a “hack-and-leak” involving the Bidens.
Then, when the @nypost Biden family corruption story came out, Big Tech did what the FBI primed them to do – they censored it.
Facebook demoted it for a week right before the election, and Twitter prevented anyone from sharing the link to the story.
Shocking internal notes from a Microsoft employee from the day the @nypost story came out confirm that the FBI “tipped” Big Tech off about “this Burisma story” a “week” earlier.
This was election interference, plain and simple.
Big Tech knew this work with the FBI would affect the 2020 election.
In an internal chat, Facebook employees joked that when they get called to testify about "why we influenced the 2020 election," they could “say we have been meeting for YEARS with the US gov’t to plan for it.”
And Facebook’s communications team didn’t fear that the press would criticize them for censoring a true story on the Biden family’s influence peddling.
Why?
As they joked about internally the night the story broke: “The Press is only as good to you as you are bad to Trump”
Internal Facebook messages obtained by @JudiciaryGOP & @Weaponization show that Big Tech employees knew their “trusted secret squirrel partners”—in the US gov’t—would give them cover for censoring the story even though they wouldn’t be able to prove that the laptop was hacked.
Right on cue, just five days after the @nypost story was published, 51 former intelligence community members, organized by @SecBlinken and the Biden campaign, lied to the American people, incorrectly calling the story Russian disinformation.
Even though the story was obviously not Russian disinformation, Big Tech continued to censor it because they knew that’s what the Biden-Harris Administration would want.
As Facebook’s senior leadership debated about censoring the @nypost story, Nick Clegg, VP of Global Affairs, explained why they had to continue to censor:
“Our calls on this [decision] could colour the way an incoming Biden administration views us more than almost anything else”
This was just the beginning of Big Tech’s censorship at the Biden-Harris Administration’s behest.
A few months later, Facebook, YouTube, and Amazon began caving to the Biden-Harris White House’s pressure to censor American speech, including true information and jokes.
UK GOVERNMENT TRIED TO CENSOR CRITICISM OF ITSELF AND DEBATE ABOUT IMMIGRATION DURING LARGE-SCALE RIOTS IN AUGUST 2024.
Thread:
As UK citizens become increasingly frustrated by a system weaponized against them, UK authorities wanted Big Tech to censor discussions about immigration and “narratives about the police and a ‘two-tier’ system.”
In recent years, UK citizens have become increasingly fed up with the “double standard” in the UK:
Mean tweets get you a longer prison sentence than many violent offenses.
THE AMAZON FILES PART 3 – AMAZON’S CENSORED BOOKS LIST
We knew that @Amazon censored books because of pressure from the Biden @WhiteHouse.
Now we know which books:
--Children’s Books
--Books for Parents
--Books critical of Big Pharma
🧵 Thread:
.@JudiciaryGOP and @Weaponization obtained internal Amazon documents showing that the urgent “impetus” for Amazon censoring books in March 2021 was “criticism from the Biden administration.”
To censor the books, Amazon created a “new [Do Not Promote] class for anti-vax books.”
Internal emails reveal that Amazon initially added 43 books to its newly created “Do Not Promote” class of allegedly anti-vaccine books.
These pro-censorship changes were being made “due to criticism from the Biden people.”
Before finalizing a new content moderation policy proposal, YouTube asked the Biden White House to review and for their “feedback.”
🧵 Thread:
.@JudiciaryGOP and @Weaponization obtained internal Google docs revealing the Biden White House’s pressure campaign against YouTube.
As revealed in the YouTube Files, the company was concerned things could “spiral out of control” and wanted to stay on good terms with the White House because they were seeking “to work closely with [the Biden] administration on multiple policy fronts.”
“The impetus for this request is criticism from the Biden Administration about sensitive books we’re giving prominent placement to, and should be handled urgently.”
🧵 Thread:
In Amazon Files Part 1, we saw that Amazon had to prep talking points in March 2021 about whether the Biden Admin was asking the company to remove books.
On March 2, 2021, the Biden White House began its pressure campaign.