Christ, reading anything about the rise of Hitler is so unsettling these days. The key thing is that there was nothing inevitable about it -- he rose to power thanks to a few thoughtless decisions by the small, feckless men around him. Sound familiar?
Goebbels, 1928: "The big joke on democracy is that it gives its mortal enemies the tools to its own destruction."
It's also chilling to read how many times the Nazis failed before they succeeded -- they were broke & unpopular in the early 1930s -- and how many times they were written off. Hitler dismissed all these press reports as a "witch hunt." Sound familiar?
Conservatives were less concerned about Hitler -- they thought they had boxed him in & could use him to their own ends -- than they were about the (wildly overestimated) threat from the left. The center-left joined them in this asymmetric obsession. Hmm. 🧐
The Nazis organized their street thugs into semi-legitimate vigilante enforcers that engaged in (at first scattered & inconsistent) street violence against the Nazi's opponents, especially around elections. That street violence *increased* their public support.
Nazis began as a minority, but their opponents were too busy infighting to unite against them. They seized power with violence & lawlessness. And their support among Germans *grew* in the wake of seizing power. Repression did not spark resistance, not for a long while.
This is morbid, I'll stop. Just this final quote from the story, about the prominent figures of German society in the '30s: "All too often they were small men in a situation that required more; grave times do not always call forth great men to meet the occasion."
Yeah.
"Small men in a situation that required more" is an excellent summary of US politics over the last decade. Let's hope our experience -- which is following all the same beats as '30s Germany, with the same dynamics & personalities -- does not end in the same place.
One final thing. People say "never again." But if you take that seriously, it doesn't mean "say no when someone asks to genocide 40 million people." It's easy to say no to that. What's hard is saying no to one of the small steps that incrementally leads there.
If you put your foot down & say no to one of the incremental steps, you'll be surrounded by people saying, "oh, it's just a small thing, why make a big deal about it, you're overreacting." That's *why it's hard*. But that's where you need courage, not at the very end.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm glad I don't have to write an endorsement piece, because I really wouldn't know how to go about it. Ever since 2015, when Trump descended the escalator, I have had the same feeling, which I've never quite seen articulated, so I will briefly try:
It's basically this: Trump is so obviously, manifestly repugnant -- his words, his gestures, his behavior, his history -- that it strikes me like a tsunami. It's a kind of total, perfect, seamless repugnance that I've never witnessed before in my life. Which means ...
... pointing out some particular piece of the repugnance & arguing against it feels ... surreal, I guess. "He has regularly sexually assaulted women, almost certainly raped a few, and ... I think that's bad."
Yeah. I mean, I think rape is bad. But here's the thing ...
Bezos is just doing what the entire US elite has done for years, what many many center-left pundits still do constantly: contemplate the results of a coordinated 60-year assault on media (& other mainstream institutions) from the right & conclude a) this is our fault, and ...
... b) if we cringe more, indulge in even more self-hatred, blunt accuracy even more in the name of "balance," bend over farther backward, we can reclaim the trust of people who have said, clearly, for decades now, that they want us dead & gone, not improved.
You see the heads of institution after institution -- social media, academia, etc. -- submit to this same shit. It's difficult to tell which of them are actually dumb enough to fall for it & which of them secretly agree with the RW, but either way the result is the same.
Thank you @Mike_Podhorzer for writing this so that I feel slightly less insane. The US is on the verge of real, bona fide, violent fascism of the sort we gawk at in history books and, to a first approximation, our civic leaders don't seem that worried. weekendreading.net/p/sleepwalking…
We are, in other words, sleepwalking our way into fascism *exactly the same way previous countries have sleepwalked their way into fascism*. Exactly. All the same beats, the same dynamics, the same rhetoric. We have learned NOTHING from history. It's just fucking amazing.
Nothing makes me want to simultaneously laugh & puke these days quite like the phrase "never again." Everyone says that in the wake of every fascist atrocity, with great solemnity, and yet we do it again. And again. We're doing it again right fucking now.
This quote from Trump captures the beating heart of reactionary authoritarianism better than anything I've ever seen: "I think it is a threat. I think everything is a threat. There is nothing that is not a threat."
That is not a conclusion drawn from evidence, it is ...
... reflective of deep psychological, even neurological, structures. For whatever reason -- genetics, early childhood development, whatever -- Trump has been left with hyperactive "sensitivity to threat," as they call it. Everything else issues from that.
High sensitivity to threat yields the classic authoritarian personality: averse to ambiguity or uncertainty; attracted to simplicity & clear lines between in groups & out groups; selfishness & an assumption that *everyone* is selfish & only threat of punishment maintains order.
Kudos to @Noahpinion for refusing this absurd assignment. And the @washingtonpost should be ashamed of itself for still, at this late date, failing to understand Trump & his movement. noahpinion.blog/p/against-stee…
As @whstancil has articulated so well, the whole appeal of fascism is that it releases you from any obligation to be decent or intellectually curious or coherent in your beliefs. It is a permission structure to wallow in your basest instincts, which is why it attracts assholes.
@whstancil When Trump tries to pitch his giant nationwide pogrom as a solution to the housing crisis, he is bullshitting. He's reverse engineering some plausible rationale for what he & his followers really want, which is to make brown people suffer.
I'm feeling pretty humorless these days but even I have to admit that protesting @mattyglesias is funny as shit.
I'm getting lots of weird private responses to this & they are irritating the shit out of me & I'm already in a bad mood, so I'm just gonna yell about this for a minute. Feel free to tune out.
The situation is, support for continued fracking is effectively ubiquitous in the US establishment -- leaders of both parties, wonks & policymakers, business types, most energy experts, most pundits. For better or worse, that's the reality.