It’s important to understand that Blackrock isn’t buying Bitcoin as a speculative investment. It’s buying because of ETF inflow demand. It has to buy when there’s investor demand. And it has to sell when investors redeem fund units by selling the ETF.
What’s critical to note is that ETF buy and sell actions corresponding to fund inflows and outflows occur in real time in the spot Bitcoin market. This isn’t OTC. Market price reacts in an exaggerated fashion. This is an all new dynamic and hasn’t been tested on the downside in a grand scale yet. It will be tested though. You can count on that.
Up or down, Blackrock is raking in fee revenue. It’s the real winner. And it takes no risk. Blackrock isn’t long Bitcoin. It’s long the marketing of its ETF product.
What drives interest to the Bitcoin market among TradFi investors is volatility. But volatility works both ways. Up and down. Afterall, the Bitcoin ETF is now just a high beta and high liquidity financial asset. Just like what Blackrock envisioned. The marketing has worked.
However, the ETF is a double edged sword. When there’s ETF outflows, the Bitcoin must be market sold. A liquidation cascade can be catastrophic to Bitcoin price. That’s the black swan. We’ll see this ome day. Add leveraged Microstrategy, and all the other countless ETFs and derivs to the mix, and think about how quickly things can turn for the worse.
To put it into perspective, recall the time Terra sold its Bitcoin reserves in a desperate attempt to save Luna / UST. And FTX did the same to try to prop up a crashing FTT following the Coindesk article. It was also widely reported that Binance sold Bitcoin to defend BNB price from reaching a key liquidation level. We also saw Germany recentlly selling a relatively small amount of seized Bitcoin, which caused the price to crash below $50k.
All these actions, which were relatively tiny in scale to current ETF exposure, absolutely obliterated the Bitcoin price in a short period of time. It’s important to note that ETF investors are trend followers.
Thesre aren’t the same traders as Bitcoin maximalists that will hodl up and down during good times and bad like a cult. ETF traders cut bait quickly and move on to the next opportunity to try to make it back.
This isn’t a Bitcoin bear post. If you recall, I was one of the only people here pounding the table to buy the recent Bitcoin move under $60k. The support seemed obvious. And the technical level held when everybody was max bearish and making fun of the Uptober meme. That was only a few weeks ago.
But narratives shift quickly. And now the narrative is that Blackrock is buying your Bitcoin. Which isn’t exactly factual. The ETF investors are buying it. And they’re a fickle bunch. What is guaranteed is that the blade will cut the other way at some point and this will provide a great entry to those that are patient.
Remember, you only need to make a few trades a year. I’ve been preaching the virtues of not over trading since I started this account. It’s the best and most consistent advice I can provide.
There’s not many exceptionally lopsided +EV bets every year. Right now the Bitcoin market can go either way. Trend is up. But sentiment is too bullish for my liking. To me there’s no bet to be made at this current level. It’s just a guessing game. And guessed are -EV or neutral at best.
Can Bitcoin go to $100k? Absolutely. But I’d rather buy again at $50k. And I’m ok if I miss the rest of this move. Because there will always be another financial opportunity with better upside odds. I like to buy assets when hated and sell when less hated. Bitcoin was hated a few weeks ago. It’s clearly not hated anymore.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
ETH at $300B market cap is maybe the most overvalued financial asset in the world. You have the team and founders rage dumping. There’s no real use for it as it costs next to nothing to send a tx. It flipped back to inflationary. And it’s own L2 betas have canibalized any demand.
This really shouldn’t be a controversial take. Ethereum is a fantastic smart contract pioneer. I’m talking about the valuation of the utility token. I can’t think of any other asset in the world that’s valued at $300B with fees in such rapid decline with no real plan to fix this.
Also, I think despite this it’s not a good idea to short ETH. Unless it’s paired with a BTC long. I’ve been advocating this trade all year. Been called a stupid idiot and worse for it. But it has played out. I’m bullish Bitcoin here. And if BTC goes up, so will ETH in sympathy.
Last week I asked if my audience wants tech stock alpha and the response was very positive. So here’s favorite play, $BLND. And it’s one that you can buy at a significant discount to what goat VC Joe Lonsdale paid. At a 60% discount to the dogwifhat meme coin, we like Blend Labs
Now why would real world chads like @jtlonsdale @jerrychen @saammotamedi be on the tl about what looks like just an ordinary small cap busted IPO SaaS company? Well that piqued my interest. Because ultimately stocks are no different than crypto. They’re narrative driven. Stocks are also my wheelhouse.
Blend Labs has deep roots in Silicon Valley. It’s backed by literally the who’s who of tech investors, including Peter Thiel, 8VC, Andreessen Horowitz, Greylock, General Atlantic and more.I The company was founded by a few early Palantir bros, including Erin Collard who worked with Thiel at Clarium Capital and was a very key player there making the firm a ton of money (thanks for the background story there @wotnaut).
Long story short, they’re all friends with Elon Musk, and part of the legendary PayPal Mafia that’s known to take care of its own.
It's worth noting that Erin Collard is still on the Blend Labs board of directors. And so is Tim Mayopoulos, who's a real mover and shaker that was former President of the company before being hand picked by the Federal Reserve to head Silicon Valley Bank following its collapse. He's an under mentioned power player. And in banking it's all about who you know.
The current CEO Nima Ghamsari was also one of the original founders and has that Palantir pedigree. He has a great story as a first generation immigrant from war torn Iran that worked his way through college playing poker. Well spoken and extremely sharp guy that’s devoted most of his professional life to building Blend Labs. This isn’t a startup. Nima has been grinding away on it since 2012. Through multiple boom and bust periods.
But Blend Labs only went public in 2021. The peak of the post pandemic housing market. It launched as an IPO at a $4.4b valuation. Most thought it would be up only from there. Certainly that was the anticipation as CEO @nghamsari was even awarded a stock option package similar to Elon with executions into the tens of billions of dollars level for the stock, which now sits at a $600m FDV leaving the options way out of the money.
Nima was so bullish on the prospects of the stock, that he even took a loan and leveraged his own equity in the company to get more shares. And as rates rose and the mortgage market ground to a halt, the stock fell dramatically. Reaching levels over 90% lower than the IPO only a couple years prior.
This forced Nima to liquidate shares at the absolute bottom to cover payments on the loan. This was all disclosed in filings and also in a heartfelt post on the company blog regretting the situation.
(2/4)
But here we are. This is the generational wealth opportunity I’m always on the lookout for. I say this because there’s no fundamental problem with the company. The balance sheet is quite conservative. In fact, a large portion of the debt was recently repaid, leaving only $135m outstanding and the term loan was extended at the same time by the lender until the back half of 2027. Lenders have more information than anybody and that's a vote of confidence right there to extend the loan. The balance sheet is manageable as it currently has cash in excess of the debt and has guided to cash flow positive by 2026. Well before the loan becomes due.
Obviously with $BLND in free fall mode like it was last year, the baby gets thrown out with the bath water. And the street starts to lump everything together. Including ridiculous SPACS that warrant valuation melt downs. But this was never a SPAC. It’s a 12 year old tech company with pretty essential software that has raised multiple private rounds well into the billions of dollars in valuation. Retail can now buy this for a fraction of the price thanks to the general misapprehension.
The final private round for Blend Labs was the Series G at a $3.3B valuation in 2020, during peak covid fear. And the current valuation is discounted by 80% to that round. So this is one of those rare occasions that the little guy can get a substantially better entry than the smartest and wealthiest investors in the world. In this case General Atlantic Partners, which led that round and is still holding.
There was some very under appreciated alpha last week when Joe Lonsdale posted that he just had dinner with Nima the night before and reiterating his bullishness and positive outlook on the company. Joe was a Palantir bro as well. He’s also one of the most well respected VCs in Silicon Valley. Presumably he met up with Nima at the Upfront VC Summit in Los Angeles where he was speaking to a packed house.
Generally speaking, I think we’re starting to see a rotation out of big tech into smaller cap Russell Index type plays. Funds will be looking to increase exposure to these higher beta names and looking for quality at the same time. Which isn’t easy as much of the small cap tech space is full of garbage spacs and that bubble rightfully popped and will never come back. So Blend Labs is well positioned in this respect. It has the pedigree of a mid to large cap tech (which it was expected to be) but sold off so much due to macro events out of its control that it’s now a small cap tech bargain ripe for the picking.
Certainly we’ve seen the funds starting to accumulate the stock during Q4. These reports are delayed, but as of the February 15 filing deadline for Q4 holdings, you can clearly see the institutions starting to ease into positions. They trade with algos however, and as volumes are relatively low as with most small cap stocks, it’s a process to accumulate a meaningful amount of shares. But the tide is turning. And the stock is still down about 85% from IPO, so it’s a nascent opportunity for those that aren’t trading quarters and have a reasonable outlook and time frame for the story to play out. Because it will.
(3/4)
For the enterprise SaaS space, $BLND is already trading at a remarkable discount to the norms. Valuations are based on sales and it has an attractive multiple of only 4x 2024 sales. This is very low given the over 70% gross margins and expected 30% compound growth over the next 3 years, along with expected EBITDA profitability by next year. All this with new diversified product offerings like the consumer banking platform that reduces Blend Labs sales exposure to the mortgage market.
Most importantly, despite being in possibly the worst part of the macro mortgage cycle, Blend Labs has managed to rapidly increase its market share in mortgage originations to over 20%. Pretty much doubling its market share since it went public. It can’t change the macro environment, it can only mitigate the effects by making the right moves. Which it has done. For instance, the company has acted quickly in cutting expenses mostly by substantially reducing headcount and diversifying the product offering away from just mortgages into the broader consumer banking and finance realm.
People see small cap tech and think of a tiny company, but Blend Labs isn’t one. It processed nearly $2 trillion in loan applications in 2022. It boasts 39 out of the top 100 US banks as customers, including Wells Fargo and US Bank. Recent executive comments have reiterated that the sales pipeline is robust and growing. From 40 integrations to now 60 as of late last year.
Each incremental integration will substantially move the needle. And time to deployment is a fraction of what it once was now that the company rolled out Blend Builder. This is its own proprietary low code product. Compare this to competitors like SimpleNexus from nCino that are simply built on top of Salesforce for instance. You can clearly see the value add of owning your own codebase like Blend Labs does. There’s real value in the actual platform and the competition are as we say in crypto essentially forks of other products. Only apples and oranges comparisons can be made with respect to Blend Labs' competition.
Recent market research has demonstrated that Blend Labs product saves lenders about $1500 per funded loan. As a result, the company has significant potential pricing power since it’s only charging about $80 each. Albeit the most significant , mortgage originations is just a single Blend Labs product out of the entire suite. And alone it can have a TAM of over $2b just by charging customers 10-20% of the savings, which seems reasonable. The company is still in build out mode and is under charging to gain market share. It’s working. And the product is a sticky one as evidenced by the nearly absent attrition.
Blend Labs did make a mistake buying the low margin but boisterous at the time Title365 business form Mr. Cooper for $422m. This asset has been significantly written down already. Although the past Q3 results showed that it’s at least shifted into positive margin territory, which is great. But as Blend Labs is all about Blend Builder now and automation, this part of the company I’m betting will be sold off. Blend Labs has a new job posting for an M&A lawyer as I write this. I’m betting it has something to do with this as a divesture has been rumored already. Selling that business will be a major catalyst for the stock if it happens.
In addition to all the cash on hand and the expendable title business, the company can also monetize its never talked about venture portfolio. This includes a 2021 seed investment into Bilt Rewards, which has literally mooned in value since and now probably worth upwards of $50m, and no less than $25m. That’s a big win and I imagine can be monetized if needed.
I’ve taken a few weeks off from 24/7 content creation. Unlike most “influencers” (I hate that word), I put serious effort into my Tweets, Spaces, and Discord. I don’t just guess at things, I do an insane amount of research. And for free. Unlike paid Discords.
What’s so ironic to me is I’m being thrown under the bus by some of the same people (some with paid Discords) that I have months of message history with where they thank me repeatedly for helping them make a ton of money in NFTs, and even DeFi.
My opinion is that the NFT Ethics account is doing a great service for the community by outing scams. But, the main NFT projects I’ve been involved with from the start are some of the most successful in the space. That is Pixel Vault, PUNKS Comic, MetaHero Universe, and Wolf Game
The NFT market isn't weak because ETH is surging. It surged back in March and April, and the NFT market had an epic bull run during those months.
What's happening is that there's just so much supply, and most of it is simply low effort cash grabs.
We saw the same dynamic with the ICO market in 2017. ICOs were pretty effective early on. Ethereum being the prime example. Binance followed the next year. Other big ones too that are still meaningful players in the crypto space.
At some point in each cycle it simply becomes too easy to make money. We reached peak saturation about a month ago, when there were a dozen new mints a day and nearly every one sold out for a few million dollars. And for every secondary sale success there were ten fails.
I think in the next few days, @Gfunkera86 will probably announce something formal about DAOs. I know he's working with a top law firm to properly establish the Founder's DAO, Planetary DAOs, UPDAO and the PVDAO. A critical process.
Once this is done, technological governance solutions like Snapshot may be added to the Founder's DAO. This includes a voting protocol. Each token is a vote. As a major Founder's DAO token holder, I plan to propose some things that I believe will be to the benefit of DAO members.
The first thing I will propose is to distribute the 25M $PUNKS tokens to members. This token represents fractional ownership of the 16 CryptoPunks featured in @punkscomic. Additionally, it has a treasury with 236 ETH in it, located at PunksWallet.eth.
@punkscomic Issue #1
- Genesis NFT of Pixel Vault
- Digital comic + physical w/ certificate of authenticity and collectors case. Shipped free worldwide
- Can be burned for @MetaHero_ MoonDAO token
- Stake comic to earn 50% of $PUNKS tokens
More👇
- $PUNKS token is fractional ownership of the 16 CryptoPunks found on PunksComic.com, which are the inspiration of the comic characters (and now MetaHero).
- Also, 100% of both Merch profits (big news on this soon), and 100% of SuperRare profits will go to $PUNKS reserve
- $PUNKS reserve is at PunksWallet.eth, and it currently has 238 ETH. This came mostly from MetaHero Universe minting revenue. A small part from PUNKS auction on SuperRare. It will be used for liquidity and to buy back $PUNKS tokens, to distribute as staking rewards