🧵Ok, I think we need a thread here on how Tucker Carlson ended up getting this bat-guano insane email from the New York Times. It's the product of a left-wing conspiracy that's been making the rounds this week.
2/ Heather Cox Richardson is a Boston College history professor that writes "Letters From An American" -- one of the most popular Substacks in the country.
3/ The newsletter is kind of the height of midwittery, but follows a simple formula: Pick some obscure or inapt historical event and use it to illustrate why Trump and/or Republicans are the devil. Suffice to say, people lap it up.
4/ Naturally, on Monday morning Richardson was all over the Trump at MSG/Nazi rally comparisons, and tossed off this aside in her column. It's clearly a bad faith jab trying to tie Trump to the Proud Boys, done in a "just asking questions" way.
5/ So that lands in thousands of liberal inboxes, and later that day "journalist" Katie Couric reads a chunk of Richardson's newsletter in a livestream with Puck's Tara Palmieri -- including the bit about wearing black and gold to support the Proud Boys.
6/ Based on the email to Tucker above, now a complete conspiracy theory has taken hold in the liberal elite, and now even the New York Times is trying to launder into respectability the notion that if you wear black and gold you support fascism.
7/ I don't care much that stuff like this happens. There are always fevered swamps of paranoia in politics but...
8/ ...what I care about is that the narrative for several years has been the right has to be censored for spouting disreputable conspiracies, while ignoring that the vaunted New York Times doing the same thing is a much bigger problem than randos on the right with X accounts. FIN
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A few random thoughts about the special counsel report:
On one hand, it's outrageous they're not charging Biden for the same crimes they're charging Trump for.
On the other, shivving him by revealing he's senile might have bigger political impact than bringing charges.
Now that we have some independent confirmation he's in mental decline, Biden's claims that he was not involved with Hunter's corruption are definitively unreliable.
The Biden campaign probably thought they were going to get away with refusing to debate Trump... getting away with that just got much, much, much harder.
In September 2005, Hunan journalist Shi Tao was sentenced to 10 years in prison for sending the Chinese Propaganda Department’s directives to a website that advocates democracy.
Specifically, it was a memo warning journalists not to publish anything relating to Chinese dissidents marking the 15th anniversary of Tiananmen Square.
The Obama admin floated -- multiple times -- removing the tax exempt status from churches. There was little braying concern about authoritarianism then.
To be clear I don't support removing the tax exempt status of colleges but there's one salient point that should be made...
If colleges reported that they had zero black faculty everyone would naturally conclude they are discriminatory. But the fact that major colleges have no self-identified Republicans teaching? That's something. Colleges are basically asking to be regulated here...
1/ There have been a lot of jokes, but people haven’t sussed out the real problem with @nhannahjones’ conspiratorial tweets yesterday – she’s missing the *real conspiracy.* This isn’t just about New York’s firemen organizing a campaign to deprive protesters of...
2/ ...precious sleep or pave the way for artillery attacks on citizens. In fact, I’m reliably informed that on July 4 there will be shock-and-awe level fireworks at every city in America in order to reinforce the fraudulent notion that America was born in 1776.
3/ The goal of these fireworks is ultimately to delegitimize the entire 1619 project by celebrating a document that states “that all men are created equal” when we know that all men are equal, but some men are more equal than others. Even more disturbing is this...
So this thread has gotten a lot of attention and a slew of media outlets have picked it up. As someone who grew up in Oregon and heard the “exploding whale” story many times and even studied it at UO journalism school, this thread gets a key part of the story kinda wrong.
Specifically, this bit: “An ex-member of the military advised George and the other officials that this was waaaay too much [explosives], and just a few sticks of dynamite would be enough. They ignored his advice.” The lesson? “DON’T IGNORE THE ADVICE THAT EXPERTS GIVE YOU.”
Especially right now, that’s a very sound lesson – I’ve read and favorably reviewed @radiofreetom’s book! – but this story in some ways is a really bad example.
So I missed Kamala Harris' op-ed in the NYT on the Senate impeachment trial. Specifically this bit, which we should probably talk about.
Do recall that when various people said that real-life court/constitutional considerations should guide how the House impeachment hearings were held a few weeks back, this idea was roundly mocked and sneered at. "It's not a real trial, basic rights given defendants don't apply!"
I mean, law professors were weighing in to sneer at this (and FWIW I think it's a reasonable framework for guiding a process the Constitution doesn't really detail, regardless of whether I agree on Sen. Harris' specific ideas.)