Michael Pettis Profile picture
Nov 3 10 tweets 2 min read Read on X
1/10
I've had many discussions about trade and industrial policy since Lighthizer's article came out, and it seems to me that there is a lot of confusion about just what constitutes "beggar-thy-neighbor" policies.

ft.com/content/c72fac…
2/10
If a country wants to shift its economy from less favored sectors to more favored sectors, such as EV's, by subsidizing and supporting the latter at the expense of the former, this simply represents the development of productivity in the economy.
3/10
It's not beggar-thy-neighbor. It just means moving up the value chain more aggressively. As the share of production in EVs increases, in this case, it decreases in less-favored sectors by the same relative amount, so that total production remains in line with total demand.
4/10
That isn't a predatory trade policy because if a country shifts from producing less-favored goods to producing more-favored goods, its contribution to global demand remains the same. It will export more of the former and import more of the latter.
5/10
That is precisely how comparative advantage works.

Of course this doesn't mean that if one country chooses to support EVs, other countries may no longer do the same. If they also favor EV production, they too should implement favorable trade and industrial policies.
6/10
This may very well result in trade conflict as each country tries to support its own producers at the expense of foreign producers, but as long as countries choose to alter their production patterns through industrial policy, this is inevitable.
7/10
The beggar-thy-neighbor problem for global trade only occurs when industrial policy supports favored sectors not at the expense of less-favored sectors but rather at the expense of households, by preventing wages and transfers from rising in line with productivity.
8/10
That's when trade become predatory, when countries systematically produce more than they can consume or invest at home. In that case rather than reverse their industrial policies by raising wages, or suffer the unemployment consequences as...
9/10
domestic producers respond to weak domestic demand by closing down production facilities, they simply export the excess production to their trade partners without using the additional exports to pay for additional imports.
10/10
It is only when industrial policies suppress domestic demand – and externalize the cost by running trade surpluses, as the US did in the 1930s, Japan in the 1980s, Germany in the 2000s and China today – that they become beggar-thy-neighbor policies.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

Nov 4
1/7
Very interesting, and possibly significant, article from @Lingling_Wei. She makes two important points. First, she says that we should not expect a "bazooka" set of policies this week or for the rest of this year.

via @WSJwsj.com/world/china/ch…
2/7
Second, she says not to expect any stimulus directed towards boosting consumption: "Many economists have urged China’s leadership to shift its focus away from factories and toward getting more money into the pockets of...
3/7
Chinese consumers. Such a strategic change in economic policy, the people say, isn’t in the cards, at least for the foreseeable future."

Her first point wouldn't surprise me. It is getting awfully late in the year for a stimulus to have much impact on this year's growth.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 1
1/5
Robert Lighthizer is right: "What we have seen in recent decades is countries adopting industrial policies that are designed not to raise their standard of living but to increase exports — in order both to...

via @ftft.com/content/c72fac…
2/5
accumulate assets abroad and to establish their advantage in leading edge industries. These are not the market forces of Smith and Ricardo. These are the beggar-thy-neighbour policies that were condemned early in the last century."
3/5
Most economists agree that trade intervention reduces global welfare in a well-functioning global trading system in which countries specialize in producing goods in which they have comparative advantage and exports these goods in order to maximize the value of imports.
Read 5 tweets
Oct 29
1/4
FT: "“What did the Chinese do, what did the Japanese do and what did the Koreans do when they were behind on technology? They collaborated,” says Andy Palmer, a consultant who was previously chief executive of luxury marque Aston Martin."

via @ftft.com/content/b95f9a…
2/4
"“The European industry needs to get the Chinese to localise in Europe and it needs to collaborate with them, particularly around battery technology, in order to catch up,” he adds."

That's a pretty distorted reading of what Japan, South Korea and China did to "catch up".
3/4
In fact they intervened to undervalue their currencies, they lowered interest rates while directing credit mainly to infrastructure and the manufacturing sectors, they kept wages from growing in line with productivity, and they often imposed restrictions on imports.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 27
1/10
In this article Bloomberg notes that "the effects of the Smoot-Hawley Act of 1930 became the textbook case against tariffs."

But we have to be a little careful about how we interpret the lessons of Smoot-Hawley.

via @economicsbloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/10
While many economists argue that the Smoot-Hawley tariffs are proof that tariffs damage the US economy, in fact the history of US experience with tariffs, as this article notes, was generally pretty positive.
3/10
I'd argue that the real lesson of Smoot-Hawley is that countries that depend on large trade surpluses to resolve their domestic demand deficiencies are especially vulnerable to a rise in global trade conflict.
Read 10 tweets
Oct 26
1/9
It's easy to see why many BRICS countries are wary of seeking an alternative to the dollar. The nine-nation group consists of 5 surplus economies and 4 deficit economies, with surpluses in 2023 collectively amounting to...

via @scmpnewssc.mp/b8on7?utm_sour…
2/9
3.5 times the deficits. That means that even if the BRICS nations were willing to accumulate assets in each other's countries (and they are not), they would nonetheless have to balance their collective surpluses by acquiring a huge amount of assets outside the...
3/9
BRICs economies. (It would have been more than $780 billion in 2023).

Because this mostly means that they must acquire assets in the US and, to a lesser extent, in the UK and Canada, the BRICS are collectively very dependent on open US, UK and Canadian capital accounts.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 25
1/8
Important article by Greg Ip on the failure of the IMF to acknowledge deep problems in the global trading system. Ironically, he notes, "the IMF’s architects believed a breakdown in economic cooperation contributed to the Depression."

via @WSJwsj.com/economy/global…
2/8
In the 1920s and 1930s, he continues, "countries such as the U.S. that ran large trade surpluses felt no pressure to help those with deficits, like Britain. Depressed countries sought to limit imports and boost exports by devaluing their currencies or imposing tariffs, in effect seeking to export their unemployment."
3/8
That's why at Bretton Wood, Keynes proposed (unsuccessfully) a system that prevented these disruptions. "To end such “beggar-thy-neighbor” policies," Ip writes, "British economist John Maynard Keynes proposed that trade be conducted through a global bank and...
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(