I’d vote Harris in a swing state because Trump will create worse social, economic, and political conditions for people and for our movements. But a Harris victory creates problems too, including by making the case that the Democratic Party can back genocide without consequence 1/
A Harris win would, relatedly, ratify a broader Democratic realignment away from the left and the multiracial working class, toward professionals/suburbanites. This includes intensifying militarism that’s facilitating the absorption of neocons no longer welcome in a MAGA GOP. 2/
Realignment toward wealthy centrists also risks pulling Harris to Biden’s right on economics which will in turn accelerate class dealignment underway. Biden’s economic left turn toward labor and workers was already undermined by its subordination to new Cold War nat sec agenda 3/
This Democratic Party pursues a coalitional strategy that speeds rather than reverses class dealignment; that backs xenophobic border crackdowns and fascist genocide in Gaza. That’s a party that fuels the rise of a truly dangerous far-right instead of effectively countering it 4/
A Harris victory will preserve basic environmental and economic regulation and check right-wing radicalization of judiciary. Most importantly it will preserve NLRB that’s proven critical to organized labor’s historic recent advances—and everything depends on the labor movement 5/
Whatever happens Tuesday: to accomplish anything—to stop arms to Israel, to check climate change—we need a powerful left rooted in an organized working class. Whether you agree w/ my electoral assessment or not—who cares. Let’s agree to rededicate ourselves to organized power. 6/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 2020, after the Bernie campaign failed to take action to preserve the huge movement infrastructure that we volunteers had built, a few of us in Rhode Island founded @reclaimri. We have accomplished an astonishing amount w/ a small number of talented organizers in two years 🧵
Our first big legislative win was making RI's cannabis legalization law most progressive ever by including automatic expungement of crim records AND making us the first state in the country to set aside a portion of limited cannabis retail licenses for worker-owned cooperatives.
We won those coops bc our volunteer policy team wrote a great proposal, we made it a public issue, and we had the support of the Formerly Incarcerated Union, @UFCWLocal328, and @MarijuanaPolicy. And because bill sponsor Rep. Scott Slater and Speaker @JoeShekarchi believed in it.
In victory speech, Petro said that the opposition didn’t have to worry about them eliminating capitalism because Colombia still needs to eliminate feudalism. He also reimagined left-wing Latin American developmentalism and regional integration in ecological/anti-extractive terms.
It's interesting how second pink tide seems like it's exploring profound developmental questions in a way that the first pink tide didn't, and that it's doing so as a way to think through how an expanded public sector can confront climate change by democratizing the economy.
Another thing that jumps out to me about the new Latin American left is how profoundly feminist and oriented toward queer, indigenous, and Afro politics these movements and governments are…
Bernie’s immigration plan is not just a total rejection of Trump’s xenophobic policies. It’s also a truly radical break with the bipartisan war on immigrants that made Trump possible. @BernieSanders without question sets the bar. 1/ berniesanders.com/issues/welcomi…
He rejects establishment’s beloved comprehensive immigration reform model of trading draconian enforcement for a legalization that never comes. This is a condemnation of Bush and Obama’s political strategy of mass deportation and border militarization in the name of compromise 2/
Bernie recognizes that US foreign and economic policy—including fossil-fueled climate change!—is deeply complicit in fomenting south to north migration and that only remaking the system to deliver economic justice will free people to *not* migrate and stay put if they choose. 3/
What sparked Chile’s protests against neoliberalism? A subway fare hike. This is no accident. Subway rides were already unaffordable. And during rush hour you have to wait for packed train after train to pass until you finally fight your way through the crowd on the platform. 1/
Living in Chile, @triofrancos and I found the cost of living to be high while the minimum wage is $415 a month—all for some of the longest work weeks on earth. People are revolting because the situation is intolerable. The subway is your intolerable trip to an intolerable job 2/
This cruel absurdity is perhaps nowhere clearer than when you are on a train you have paid too much to ride, suffocatingly packed like sardines, closing your eyes to imagine you’re somewhere else while you are heading to a long day of work for which you will get paid so little 3/
How did white nationalism take over Republican politics and the conservative movement? And why did nativism—the demand to "send them back"—become its most powerful expression? Here's one part of that complex story, involving both the conservative and mainstream media. THREAD. 1/
This is a tweet from Peter Brimelow, editor of leading white nationalist site VDARE, invoking Robert E. Lee to memorialize John Tanton, the recently-deceased godfather of the modern anti-immigrant movement. He played a huge role in making xenophobia central to US politics. 2/
In 90s, Brimelow was senior editor at The National Review where he wrote a '92 cover story decrying “so-called Hispanics” as a “strange anti-nation inside the U.S.” In '95, Random House published his racist book Alien Nation: Common Sense About America's Immigration Disaster 3/
Bernie's comment on "open borders" was bad. It was politically unnecessary. It played into a right-wing nativist trap. And it was deeply misleading. 1/
Immigration flows from Mexico, for example, have never been primarily shaped by border enforcement. Rather, these flows have been the product of political-economic realities in both countries, including migrant networks/pathways shaped in significant part by US capital. 2/
Capital only favors “open borders” for capital, not for people. The history is clear: the advance of neoliberalism and its opening of borders for free movement of capital has coincided w a brutal and lethal hardening of borders for Third World workers. That's not a coincidence 3/