New preprint up! "PatternBoost: Constructions in Mathematics with a Little Help from AI," with F. Charton, A.Z. Wagner, and G. Williamson: arxiv.org/abs/2411.00566
PatternBoost is a new protocol for using transformers to generate interesting mathematical examples -- say, graphs with many edges and no 4-cycles.
The idea is to alternate a "local search" (something greedy, like: given a graph, throw out edges contained in many 4-cycles until there are no 4-cycles left) with a "global search" (like: ask a transformer to give me more graphs like the 1% best performers in the last pass)
Iterated alternation does a lot better than either traditional greedy methods or un-greed-boosted transformer methods alone.
But it does much better on some problems than others! That's kind of the point of this paper; testing the same protocol in a bunch of different mathematical domains.
Which math problems are most amenable to ML techniques is pretty severely undertheorized and it would be great to know more.
(Of course one possibility is that all math problems will prove highly amenable to ML techniques! But that's not where we are now.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@BenjaminLorr I like the way it refuses to settle into being a particular kind of book. Part systems analysis, part advocacy, part DFW-adjacent reportage..
@BenjaminLorr Part here's-how-it's done business book, part GWS Trow-like philosophical finger-pointing...
This is a map of SHAPE. People, ideas, and things in the book -- just some of them! -- with the connections drawn in. Just some of them.
Everything in geometry is connected under the surface; all the ideas resonate and bounce off and reinforce each other.
And then there are just weird coincidences like Elbridge Gerry sending a six-fingered Vermont math prodigy to England to compete with the teenage William Rowan Hamilton who's friends with Wordsworth who writes about Euclid and etc.
I don't get why the contrarian/optimistic "COVID's not deadly" theory got so much more traction than the contrarian/optimistic "pandemic stops spreading at unexpectedly low prevalence level" theory.
Thought brought on by another paper by Gomes and her group on the way strong heterogeneity of transmission can model pandemics stopping at 10-20% prevalence medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Roughly, the idea is that high-transmission individuals get "used up" early in the pandemic, so natural exponential rate is depressed as those folks become immune.