Jordan Ellenberg Profile picture
Nov 5 7 tweets 1 min read Read on X
New preprint up! "PatternBoost: Constructions in Mathematics with a Little Help from AI," with F. Charton, A.Z. Wagner, and G. Williamson: arxiv.org/abs/2411.00566
PatternBoost is a new protocol for using transformers to generate interesting mathematical examples -- say, graphs with many edges and no 4-cycles.
The idea is to alternate a "local search" (something greedy, like: given a graph, throw out edges contained in many 4-cycles until there are no 4-cycles left) with a "global search" (like: ask a transformer to give me more graphs like the 1% best performers in the last pass)
Iterated alternation does a lot better than either traditional greedy methods or un-greed-boosted transformer methods alone.
But it does much better on some problems than others! That's kind of the point of this paper; testing the same protocol in a bunch of different mathematical domains.
Which math problems are most amenable to ML techniques is pretty severely undertheorized and it would be great to know more.
(Of course one possibility is that all math problems will prove highly amenable to ML techniques! But that's not where we are now.)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jordan Ellenberg

Jordan Ellenberg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JSEllenberg

Apr 22, 2022
Social-emotional learning in math textbooks is not new. A passage from a 1942 algebra textbook including the phrase
(From "A First Course in Algebra," N.J. Lennes, 1942 edition.)
Apparently, the state of Florida is moving to bar language like this from math textbooks, and I think that's just wrong.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 22, 2022
Just finished @BenjaminLorr's remarkable THE SECRET LIFE OF GROCERIES. Read this if you are a person who eats food. benjaminlorr.net/book/the-secre…
@BenjaminLorr I like the way it refuses to settle into being a particular kind of book. Part systems analysis, part advocacy, part DFW-adjacent reportage..
@BenjaminLorr Part here's-how-it's done business book, part GWS Trow-like philosophical finger-pointing...
Read 4 tweets
Jan 24, 2022
If you're in Dane County and freaking over v high NYT-reported COVID numbers for our county please note this is some kind of data glitch.
No we did not have 17,000 new cases here on one day, January 16 Image
Dane County Health explains:
publichealthmdc.com/coronavirus/da… Image
Read 5 tweets
May 17, 2021
This is a map of SHAPE. People, ideas, and things in the book -- just some of them! -- with the connections drawn in. Just some of them. Image
Everything in geometry is connected under the surface; all the ideas resonate and bounce off and reinforce each other.
And then there are just weird coincidences like Elbridge Gerry sending a six-fingered Vermont math prodigy to England to compete with the teenage William Rowan Hamilton who's friends with Wordsworth who writes about Euclid and etc.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 26, 2020
I don't get why the contrarian/optimistic "COVID's not deadly" theory got so much more traction than the contrarian/optimistic "pandemic stops spreading at unexpectedly low prevalence level" theory.
Thought brought on by another paper by Gomes and her group on the way strong heterogeneity of transmission can model pandemics stopping at 10-20% prevalence medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Roughly, the idea is that high-transmission individuals get "used up" early in the pandemic, so natural exponential rate is depressed as those folks become immune.
Read 8 tweets
Jul 4, 2020
This viral post is correct that you need to think about COVID in the US as a bunch of regional pandemics; but it's not Simpson's paradox.
Simpson's paradox would be if deaths per case were rising in every individual region, but paradoxically decreasing in the national total.
If mounting deaths in some places are countered in national totals by an negative trend elsewhere, that's important, but it's not Simpson.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(