MAGA world is convinced they are going to win and win big. They are all telling themselves it will be a blowout and that the only way Dems can win is by cheating.
But if Trump loses, he will lose fair and square. Here's a little thread to explain exactly how: /1
MAGA is losing among women by record margins. Trump is waging a horrific sexist, and women are furious.
MAGA may want to remind themselves that the GOP was terrified of overturning Roe for fear of backlash. Well, guess what? It's here. You thought it wasn't coming. It is. /2
Young people *hate* Trump. The MAGA movement is trying to overturn a century's worth of economic and social progress. Outside of a few weird incels and young GOPs, GenZ and Millennials are not having it. MAGA is losing by 15 to 20 points with the Swifties and the Brats. /3
Seniors! Harris is winning among *seniors*! That's what happens when your movement promises to privatize Medicare & Social Security, defiles standards of decency & dignity in campaign rhetoric, and lets your opponent run on bipartisanship and patriotism. Seniors vote reliably. /4
The MAGA movement uses vicious racist rhetoric to maximize the white vote. The problem is that most college grad whites find that (and the sexism and Bible thumping) gross and obnoxious.
You are losing college grads whites by over 20 points, and every year that segment grows. /5
The MAGA movement relies on evangelicals as the cornerstone of its support, and the means of growth among Hispanics despite anti-Latino racism.
But that overt Christian supremacy turns off normies. The fastest growing religion in America is "none."
"Nones" and normies vote. /6
MAGA has built a brand around hating cities--using foul and vicious language about cities and density, calling city dwellers "vermin" and "bug people", etc.
But most Americans live in cities. Most others live in close-rung suburbs. Our numbers are growing. We hear your hate. /7
MAGA sees a coalition of the MAGA right with Tulsi and RFK Jr and thinks it has a "Unity Party."
But those circles were already overlapping. The pro-Putin pseudo "left" and anti-vax conspiracy loons were already trending MAGA in 2016. You didn't pick up much there. /8
In the meantime, Dems have picked up a coalition of normal decent anti-fascist voters who span the ideological spectrum from AOC to Liz Cheney, endorsed by the biggest pop culture icons. That's an actual unity coalition.
Would you really be shocked it could hit 50%? Don't be. /9
Many MAGAs think they are going to march to victory because the polling is close, and polling underestimated Trump in 2016 and 2020.
But pollsters have been correcting for that. They are desperate not to make the same mistake again. And they may well be overcorrecting. /10
There are many dishonest GOP pollsters with opaque or bizarre assumptions. Many others have calibrated based on prior 2020 votes, potentially missing electoral shifts.
Selzer has been a canary in the coal mine to counter polling CW that favored Dems. Don't discount it now. /11
Many MAGAs think they will win based on stronger early vote. But GOP early votes are mostly cannibalizing 2020 e-day votes.
Most of the *new* voters are younger, seniors & especially women. Women are crushing early vote. Many Dems are waiting for e-day with COVID behind us. /12
The best early vote numbers for MAGA are in Nevada. But Clark County still looms large, and Dem e-day votes will be big. NV will likely be very close.
Meanwhile in PA Dems have a formidable 400K vote lead. It will be difficult for GOPs to overtake. /13
And that's assuming no crossover votes. Internal metrics suggest Harris stands to pick up as many as 10% of the GOP vote among disaffected frequent Haley voters that MAGA isn't even fighting for as it hunts for non-voting incel bros.
Many 2x Trump voters won't do it again. /14
Finally...ground game. Campaign pros know that field can make about 2-3 points difference, all else being equal.
Harris has the biggest, most effective, most precisely targeted field operation in American history. MAGA has an amateur joke operation run by Kirk and Musk. /15
MAGA fired all the experienced field ops and handed the keys over to memelords using unproven methods trying to get couchsurfing bro voters who aren't showing up so far.
Maybe they show up, maybe they don't. But only one side knows what it's doing on the ground. /16
Trump's camp, meanwhile, is so drowning in conspiracy garbage that they are using volunteers who could be doing traditional field to harass poll workers to stop "voter fraud" that Does. Not. Exist.
Total wasted effort chasing makebelieve snarks and huffledragons. /17
None of this is to say that Harris will certainly win. It will likely be close, and Trump could well prevail--at least in the Electoral College, America's peewee trophy DEI equity boost for conservative rural voters. He very likely will not win the real popular vote. /18
But if Harris wins--and it's possible she could win big if pollsters were overcorrecting for 2020--then all the signs were there.
If MAGA loses, we all know how. It's right there in the numbers, the coalitions and the tactics.
It will be fair & square. No cheating or fraud. /19
If he loses, Trump will whine & lie. Elon will whine & spread disinformation. Both will encourage MAGA to do stupid, illegal things for them. They are liars & manipulators.
But know that if you lose, MAGA, you lost fairly. Don't let Trump rob you of your dignity and humanity./20
If MAGA loses, there will always be another shot in 2028, because the good guys believe in democracy.
MAGA doesn't. Which is yet another big part of why so many of us are coming out as citizens of all ideologies to outvote you--so we have a chance to vote again.
/end
Blech. Typo in the second post.
I miss my edit button, but I refuse to pay Elon anything. 😡
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People are being deliberately obtuse about Will Stancil's points.
Since Democrats are structurally disadvantaged by a rigged system, when we DO get majorities we HAVE to use our power to unrig the system. Our legislators have to stop putting norms and comity over fixing things.
The point isn't to "not vote." The point is that we WILL lose elections. It's baked into the system, especially in a rigged system.
WE *WILL* LOSE ELECTIONS. IF LOSTING ELECTIONS MEANS FASCISM WINS, WE HAVE *ALREADY* LOST.
Dem legislators have to be bold about fixing systems.
Dems need use power in such a way that when Republicans win elections again--and at some point they will--they are structurally UNABLE to destroy democracy. Or they have to revamp their coalition to appeal to majorities.
The biggest mistake moderate Democrats are making is that they are governing to preserve institutional credibility while hoping that Trumpism will blow over, rather than preparing with grim fortitude for a society-wide confrontation with a fascist movement playing for keeps. /1
What does this look like? Let's take some examples. Democrats are trying to preserve the comity of the Senate so it keeps "working" after Trumpism dissipates, failing to get that the Senate is the barricade the fascists are fortifying to prevent us from stopping their coup. /2
The Supreme Court. Much of the center-left is terrified of expanding the court, worrying about future GOP expansions & the legitimacy of the institution, rather than understanding that the current balance, with Senate apportionment, is their siege engine against democracy./3
Going after junior staffers is wrong and inappropriate.
But the problem is that we're in a situation with NO accountability mechanism. The legislator cannot be contacted or pressured. There is no relief valve.
The only possible avenue is exposure by someone on the inside./1
The incentives for staff are also perverse. Exposing the situation potentially destroys their careers. Continuing it basically gives the senior staffers the power of a Senator and keeps their jobs.
I feel for all of them, but someone has to step forward and do the right thing./2
The legislators' *colleagues* could step forward and do the right thing. But they also have little power over it, and most of their personal and career incentives incline toward protecting the privileges of the gerontocracy, no matter the externalized costs to the public. /3
True Blue Dems wasting tens of millions of dollars on doomed vanity campaigns against MTG will do far, far more to damage to Democrats in 2024 than Marianne Williamson running a silly primary campaign that won't actually hurt Biden in the general.
You know why no one frets that a Trump vs DeSantis brawl will hurt the GOP in the general election? Because it won't.
Primaries are good. If Bernie hadn't given voice to millions of frustrated young progressive voters in 2016, Clinton might have straight-up lost the pop vote.
Since our utterly broken winner-take-all system doesn't allow for more than two viable parties, & caucus politics are a pure tug-of-war, literally the only pathway for hashing out issues internally for the sane half of the country is through the imperfect mechanism of primaries.
Almost every major error and meltdown in Dem/left politics, from post-left fash apologism to popularist left-punching cringe, comes from fatally flawed attempts to solve what I call the Upper Left Quadrant problem.
Here is the chart, and the fundamental problem: /1
This chart explains *so much* about modern American politics. What it says, simply, is that almost all the actual persuadable voters in the electorate aren't "moderates."
Biden is running again because his team is (wrongly) convinced he's the only candidate who could have beaten Trump, and the only one who can do it again.
And because there aren't a lot of great alternatives. A short thread. /1
Way too many Bernielanders proved they hate liberals more than fascists. It's hard to trust anyone who, for instance, is against helping Ukraine.
They're also replete with "left" NIMBYs who won't accept any solutions short of "ending capitalism" whatever that means. /2
Harris' approvals are abysmal, she never got traction in the primary, & her biggest supporters are a mirror version of the worst Berners: they hate progressives more than they do Romney GOPs, they like the economic status quo and have bizarre hero worship for the gerontocracy./3